On-Site Corrosion Diagnosis and Its Control by Electrochemical Techniques in Contemporary Built Heritage

  • David M. BastidasEmail author
  • Sean Coleman


Corrosion prevention of Built Heritage represents an important discipline within Heritage Science. Many metal materials have been widely used in antiques and contemporary art pieces, as well as Buildings and Construction. Conservation of metallic building structures is crucial because of cultural value and historical significance. This chapter is devoted for studying the use of electrochemical techniques for on-site corrosion monitoring. There is an increased interest in the area of heritage conservation due to its significance i.e., a strong commitment to maintain and preserve the conditions of the structures, its cultural value and structural integrity. From a Heritage Science conservation standpoint there is a need to establish new conservation strategies and policies, thus allowing to preserve the culture as a whole and the heritage identity. Identifying the current state of corrosion damage on contemporary built heritages is a crucial task that needs to be executed. Non-destructive and quantitative techniques for measuring corrosion are needed to detect the deterioration of structures at an early stage (to predict their residual life), and thus to decide what prevention or repair systems need to be applied. Electrochemical techniques provide virtually the only viable procedure for assessing reinforcement corrosion without removing the concrete layer. Electrochemical corrosion techniques are valuable non-destructive diagnostic tools used for evaluating reinforced concrete heritage buildings and structures, which can supply information for the restoration repairs. The expected outcome of the on-site application of electrochemical technique, is to identify the type of corrosion processes and mechanisms, which will establish a corrosion control and management protocol of existing contemporary buildings in order to ensure and guarantee its preservation.



Authors gratefully acknowledge The University of Akron for funding support.


  1. 1.
    Bastidas DM et al (2007) A quantitative study of concrete-embedded steel corrosion using potentiostatic pulses. Corrosion 63:1094–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    González JA (2007) F.N. Speller Award lecture: prediction of reinforced concrete structure durability by electrochemical techniques. Corrosion 63:811–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pourbaix M (1974) Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions, 2nd English edn. National Association of Corrosion Engineers, Houston, TX, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM G59–97 (2014) Standard test method for conducting potentiodynamic polarization resistance measurements. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stern M, Geary AL (1957) Electrochemical polarization I. A theoretical analysis of the shape of polarization curves. J Electrochem Soc 104:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wagner C, Traud W (1938) The analysis of corrosion procedures through the interaction of electrochemical partial procedures and on the potential difference of mixed electrodes. Z Elektroch 44:391–402Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Evans UR (1946) Metallic corrosion, passivation and protection. In: Arnold E (ed). London, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Birbilis N, Cherry BW, Forsyth M, Nairn KM (2001) A consideration of the limitation of polarization resistance method to determine corrosion status of concrete reinforcement. Proc Conf Eng Mater, 277–282Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scully JR (2000) Polarization resistance method for determination of instantaneous corrosion rates. Corrosion 56:199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bastidas DM, Medina E (2013) Armaduras de acero inoxidable “Stainless steel reinforcements”. Cedinox (ed). Madrid, SpainGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bastidas DM et al (2008) Electrochemical rehabilitation methods for reinforced concrete structures: advantages and pitfalls. Corros Eng Sci Technol 43:248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cano E, Lafuente D, Bastidas DM (2010) Use of EIS for the evaluation of the protective properties of coatings for metallic cultural heritage: a review. J Solid State Electrochem 14:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feliu V, González JA, Feliu S (2007) Corrosion estimates from the transient response to a potential step. Corros Sci 49:3242–3255Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Feliu V, González JA, Feliu S (2004) Algorithm for extracting corrosion parameters from the response of the steel-concrete system to a current pulse. J Electrochem Soc 151:B134–B140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    González JA, Miranda JM, Feliu S (2004) Considerations on reproducibility of potential and corrosion rate measurements in reinforced concrete. Corros Sci 46:2467–2485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feliu V, González JA, Andrade C, Feliu S (1998) Equivalent circuit for modelling the steel-concrete interface. I. Experimental evidence and theoretical predictions. Corros Sci 40:975–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feliu V, González JA, Andrade C, Feliu S (1998) Equivalent circuit for modelling the steel-concrete interface. II. Complications in applying the Stern-Geary equation to corrosion rate determinations. Corros Sci 40:995–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    González JA, Feliu S, Rodríguez P (1997) Threshold steel corrosion rates for durability problems in reinforced structures. Corrosion 53:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bastidas DM et al (2015) Corrosion inhibition mechanism of phosphates for early-age reinforced mortar in the presence of chlorides. Cem Concr Comp 61:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bastidas DM et al (2010) A prediction study of hydroxyapatite entrapment ability in concrete. Constr Build Mater 24:2646–2649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bastidas DM et al (2013) Comparative study of three sodium phosphates as corrosion inhibitors for steel reinforcements. Cem Concr Comp 43:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Education and Research on Corrosion and Materials Performance, NCERCAMP–UA, Department of Chemical, Biomolecular and, Corrosion EngineeringThe University of AkronAkronUSA

Personalised recommendations