Advertisement

Pre-chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)? Is It Time for a New Staging?

  • Alexander H. Kirsch
  • Alexander R. Rosenkranz
Chapter
Part of the Updates in Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection book series (UHCP)

Abstract

Recent years have shown a variety of therapeutic approaches in advanced stages of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease to fail to improve outcomes. Renal replacement therapy, while life-saving, has seen very little advances during the last two decades. Some investigators believe that in patients undergoing chronic renal replacement therapy, kidney disease and most importantly cardiovascular comorbidities have progressed past the point where any intervention can improve outcomes. Thus, the focus has shifted to very early stages of chronic kidney disease, which we hope to identify with new biomarkers. Those biomarkers could be of importance in defining a new disease, or at least a new stage of disease. It is common practice in other areas of medicine, where pre-stages like “prehypertension” and “prediabetes” are well known and defined entities that may entail therapeutic interventions and the definition of these pre-stages may thus improve outcomes. Whether “pre-CKD” can be accurately defined, and whether the detection of pre-CKD could provide a benefit to individuals in terms of early detection and intervention leading to a better survival is topic of this review.

Keywords

Chronic kidney disease Albuminuria Cardiovascular risk eGFR Biomarker Pre-CKD 

References

  1. 1.
    Coresh J, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 2007;298:2038–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu C-Y. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prischl FC, et al. Diabetes-related end-stage renal disease in Austria 1965–2013. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30:1920–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nathan DM, et al. Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance: implications for care. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:753–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vasan RS, et al. Impact of high-normal blood pressure on the risk of cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1291–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chobanian AV, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Curhan GC. Prediabetes, prehypertension … is it time for pre-CKD? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:557–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lewington S, et al. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360:1903–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sundstrom J, Neovius M, Tynelius P, Rasmussen F. Association of blood pressure in late adolescence with subsequent mortality: cohort study of Swedish male conscripts. BMJ. 2011;342:d643.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Julius S, et al. Feasibility of treating prehypertension with an angiotensin-receptor blocker. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1685–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chamberlain JJ, et al. Pharmacologic therapy for type 2 diabetes: synopsis of the 2017 American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:572–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:S11–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD-MBD Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). Kidney Int Suppl. 2009;76:S1–130.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hemmelgarn BR, et al. Relation between kidney function, proteinuria, and adverse outcomes. JAMA. 2010;303:423–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moyer VA, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for chronic kidney disease: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:567–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van der Velde M, de Jong PE, Gansevoort RT. Comparison of the yield of different screening approaches to detect chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:3222–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carville S, Wonderling D, Stevens P, Guideline Development G. Early identification and management of chronic kidney disease in adults: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2014;349:g4507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wetzels JF, Kiemeney LA, Swinkels DW, Willems HL, den Heijer M. Age- and gender-specific reference values of estimated GFR in Caucasians: the Nijmegen Biomedical Study. Kidney Int. 2007;72:632–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mattix HJ, Hsu C-Y, Shaykevich S, Curhan G. Use of the albumin/creatinine ratio to detect microalbuminuria: implications of sex and race. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13:1034–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tonneijck L, et al. Glomerular hyperfiltration in diabetes: mechanisms, clinical significance, and treatment. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28:1023–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stevens LA, Coresh J, Greene T, Levey AS. Assessing kidney function—measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2473–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Levey AS, Stevens LA. Estimating GFR using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation: more accurate GFR estimates, lower CKD prevalence estimates, and better risk predictions. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55:622–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wasung ME, Chawla LS, Madero M. Biomarkers of renal function, which and when? Clinica chimica acta. Int J Clin Chem. 2015;438:350–7.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abrahamson M, Dalboge H, Olafsson I, Carlsen S, Grubb A. Efficient production of native, biologically active human cystatin C by Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1988;236:14–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hojs R, Bevc S, Ekart R, Gorenjak M, Puklavec L. Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with mild to moderate impairment of kidney function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21:1855–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stevens LA, et al. Estimating GFR using serum cystatin C alone and in combination with serum creatinine: a pooled analysis of 3,418 individuals with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51:395–406.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ribitsch W, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) fails as an early predictor of contrast induced nephropathy in chronic kidney disease (ANTI-CI-AKI study). Sci Rep. 2017;7:41300.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kuncio GS, Neilson EG, Haverty T. Mechanisms of tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Kidney Int. 1991;39:550–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mitsnefes MM, et al. Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a marker of renal function in children with chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2007;22:101–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smith ER, et al. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin may aid prediction of renal decline in patients with non-proteinuric stages 3 and 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28:1569–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bolignano D, et al. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and progression of chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4:337–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ketteler M, et al. Executive summary of the 2017 KDIGO Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD) Guideline update: what's changed and why it matters. Kidney Int. 2017;92:26–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Isakova T, Wolf MS. FGF23 or PTH: which comes first in CKD ? Kidney Int. 2010;78:947–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gutierrez O, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-23 mitigates hyperphosphatemia but accentuates calcitriol deficiency in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:2205–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Isakova T, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 is elevated before parathyroid hormone and phosphate in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2011;79:1370–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Isakova T, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and risks of mortality and end-stage renal disease in patients with chronic kidney disease. JAMA. 2011;305:2432–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dhingra R, et al. Relations of serum phosphorus and calcium levels to the incidence of cardiovascular disease in the community. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:879–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Foley RN, Collins AJ, Ishani A, Kalra PA. Calcium-phosphate levels and cardiovascular disease in community-dwelling adults: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am Heart J. 2008;156:556–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gutiérrez OM, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and mortality among patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:584–92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Block GA, Hulbert-Shearon TE, Levin NW, Port FK. Association of serum phosphorus and calcium × phosphate product with mortality risk in chronic hemodialysis patients: a national study. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;31:607–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    The EVOLVE Trial Investigators. Effect of cinacalcet on cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing dialysis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:2482–94.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1205624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Raggi P, et al. The ADVANCE study: a randomized study to evaluate the effects of cinacalcet plus low-dose vitamin D on vascular calcification in patients on hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:1327–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Blacher J, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, London GM. Arterial calcifications, arterial stiffness, and cardiovascular risk in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2001;38:938–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Moe SM, et al. Cinacalcet, fibroblast growth factor-23, and cardiovascular disease in hemodialysis: the Evaluation of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events (EVOLVE) trial. Circulation. 2015;132:27–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fliser D, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) predicts progression of chronic kidney disease: the Mild to Moderate Kidney Disease (MMKD) study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:2600–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gutiérrez OM, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and left ventricular hypertrophy in chronic kidney disease. Circulation. 2009;119:2545–52.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Grabner A, et al. Activation of cardiac fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 causes left ventricular hypertrophy. Cell Metab. 2015;22:1020–32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mirza MA, et al. Relationship between circulating FGF23 and total body atherosclerosis in the community. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009;24:3125–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Evenepoel P, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-23 in early chronic kidney disease: additional support in favor of a phosphate-centric paradigm for the pathogenesis of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1268–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Parker BD, et al. The associations of fibroblast growth factor 23 and uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein with mortality in coronary artery disease: the Heart and Soul Study. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:640–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander H. Kirsch
    • 1
  • Alexander R. Rosenkranz
    • 1
  1. 1.Clinical Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal MedicineMedical University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations