Advertisement

Consumer Choice as a Pathway to Food Diversity: A Case Study of Açaí Berry Product Labelling

  • Hope Johnson
  • Christine Parker
  • Rowena Maguire
Chapter
Part of the LITES - Legal Issues in Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies book series (LITES, volume 2)

Abstract

Through labelling and marketing claims, açaí berries appear to be a purchase consumers can make to support biological diversity and rural development in the Amazon while uniquely meeting their nutritional needs. Accordingly, açaí berries seem ideal for consumers seeking to promote food diversity including biological and dietary diversity. This is supported by the popular notion that consumers can “vote with their forks” for a more sustainable and just food system. Yet the type, accuracy and form of information conveyed, as well as the standards that must be satisfied before such claims can be made, have been pre-determined by regulators and açaí companies. Using a “backwards mapping” methodology, this chapter identifies and critiques the common marketing claims on açaí products relevant to food diversity. Ultimately, the chapter reveals some of the problems with the notion that consumers can facilitate food diversity using their purchasing power.

Keywords

Açaí berries Food labelling Certification Food diversity Non-timber forest products 

References

  1. Agriculture and Agrifood Canada (2012) “Socially Conscious Consumer Trends Fair Trade,” Market Analysis Report. http://www5.agr.gc.ca/resources/prod/Internet-Internet/MISB-DGSIM/ATS-SEA/PDF/6153-eng.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2015
  2. Australian Certified Organic (2015) About. http://aco.net.au/about/. Accessed 8 Dec 2015
  3. Australian Certified Organic Standard (2013) Wild harvest. http://austorganic.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ACOS-2013-final.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2015
  4. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (2015) False or misleading claims. https://www.accc.gov.au/consumers/misleading-claims-advertising/false-or-misleading-claims. Accessed 8 Dec 2015
  5. Australian Organic Ltd (2014) “Australian Organic Market Report 2014”. http://austorganic.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/AO_Report_2014_web.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2015
  6. Berti PR, Jones AD (2013) Biodiversity’s contribution to dietary diversity. In: Fanzo C, Hunter T, Boerelli F, Mattei F (eds) Diversifying food and diets using agricultural biodiversity to improve nutrition and health. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 186–206Google Scholar
  7. Boyce J (1999) The globalization of market failure? International Trade and Sustainable Agriculture. Political Economy Research Institute. http://www.peri.umass.edu/236/hash/43dbd9bc4f82b433b3881dc845aa0318/publication/23/. Accessed 3 Dec 2015
  8. Brondízio E (2004) From staple to fashion food: shifting cycles and shifting opportunities in the development of the acai palm fruit economy in the Amazon estuary. In: Zarin DJ, Alavalapati JRR, Putz FE, Schmink M (eds) Working forests in the neotropics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 339–365Google Scholar
  9. Brondízio E, Siqueira A (1997) From extractivists to forest farmers: changing concepts of agricultural intensification and peasantry in the Amazon estuary. Res Econ Anthropol 18:233–258Google Scholar
  10. Bussman R, Zambrana NYP (2012) Facing global markets- usage changes in Western Amazonian plants: the example of Euterpe precatoria Mart. and E. oleracea Mart. Acta Soc Bot Pol 81(4):257–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang H-S et al (2003) University of New England “An Overview of the Organic Food Products Market in Australia” Working Paper Series, Agricultural Resource Economics. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/12928/1/wp030010.pdf. Accessed 21 Dec 2015
  12. Clark EL (2014) Amazonia: the historical ecology of a domesticated landscape. In: Hecht S, Morrison KD, Padoch C (eds) The social lives of forests: past, present, and future of woodland resurgence. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 157–183Google Scholar
  13. Codex Alimentarius (1991) “General Guidelines on Claims, CAC/GL 1-1979”. http://www.codexalimentarius.org/standards/list-ofstandards/en/?provide=standards&orderField=fullReference&sort=asc&num1=CAC/GL. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  14. Colapinto J (2011) Strange fruit: the rise and fall of acai. The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2011/05/30/strange-fruit-john-colapinto. Accessed 21 Dec 2015
  15. De Schutter O (2011) The right to an adequate diet: the agriculture-food-health-nexus (A/HRC/19/59) presented at the 19th session of the United Nations Human Rights CouncilGoogle Scholar
  16. Deaton BJ (2004) A theoretical framework for examining the role of third-party certifiers. Food Control 15:615–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fajans J (2012) Brazilian food: race, class and identity in regional cuisines. Berg, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Filho MCF, Sousa JW (2013) Structuring of the acai pulp exporting agribusiness’ organizational field. Rev Bus Manag 15(47):169–185Google Scholar
  19. FLO-CERT (2015b) Compliance criteria list: trade certification, NSF Checklist TC 8.0 EN-GB. http://www.flocert.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/TC-PublicComplianceCriteria-ED-8.0-en.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2015
  20. FLO-CERT (2015c) Public compliance criteria list- small producers’ organizations, Checklist HL 7.2 EN-GB. http://www.flocert.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/PC-PublicComplianceCriteriaHL-ED-7.2-en.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2015
  21. Food Standards Australia and New Zealand (2013) Food labelling. http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/industry/labelling/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 8 Dec 2015
  22. Fraser JA (2010) Caboclo horticulture and Amazonian dark earths along the middle Madeira river, Brazil. Hum Ecol 38(5):651–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Freitas M et al (2015) Floristic impoverishment of Amazonian floodplain forests managed for acai fruit production. Forest Ecol Manag 351:20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gale FP (2000) Economic specialization versus ecological diversification: the trade policy implications of taking the ecosystem approach seriously. Ecol Econ 34(3):285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gonzalez C (2011) An environmental justice critique of comparative advantage: indigenous peoples, trade policy, and the Mexican neoliberal economic reforms. J Int Law 32(3):723–803Google Scholar
  26. Guthman J (2007) The polyanyian way? Voluntary food labels as neoliberal governance. Antipode 39:457–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris M (2005) Nature makes them lazy: contested perceptions of place and knowledge in the lower Amazon floodplain of Brazil. Conservat Soc 3(2):461–478Google Scholar
  28. Hiraoka M (1994) Land use changes in the Amazon estuary. Global Environ Change 5(4):323–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hobson K (2004) Sustainable consumption in the United Kingdom: the “Responsible” consumer and government at “Arm’s Length”. J Environ Dev 13(2):121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson H (2015) Eating for health and the environment. Aust Regul Resp Diet Change 15(2):122–139Google Scholar
  31. Johnstone N (1995) Trade liberalization, economic specialization and the environment. Ecol Econ 14(3):165–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis J (2008) The power of knowledge: information transfer and acai intensification in the Peri-Urban interface of Belem, Brazil. Agrofor Syst 74(3):293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mhurchu CN, Gorton D (2007) Nutrition labels and claims in New Zealand and Australia: a review of use and understanding. Aust New Zeal J Publ Health 21(2):105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moegenburg S, Levey D (2002) Prospects for conserving biodiversity in Amazonian extractive reserves. Ecol Lett 5(3):310–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norgaard RB (1987) Economics as mechanics and the demise of biological diversity. Ecol Model 38(2):107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pace R (1997) The Amazon Caboclo: what’s in a name? Lu-Braz Rev 34(2):81–89Google Scholar
  37. Pace R (1998) The struggle for Amazon town: Gurupá revisited. Lynne Rienner Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Parker C (2013) Voting with your fork? Industrial free-range eggs and the regulatory construction of consumer choice. ANALS, AAPS 649(1):52–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parker C (2015) Strawberry fields forever: can consumers see pesticides and sustainability as an issue? Sustain Sci 10:285–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker C, Scrinis G (2014) Out of the cage and into the barn: supermarket power food system governance and the regulation of free range eggs. Griff Law Rev 23(2):318–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Parker C et al (2013) The happy hen on your supermarket shelf: what choice does industrial strength free-range represent for consumers? J Bioeth Inq 10(2):165–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raffles H (2002) In Amazonia: a natural history. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  43. Raynolds LT (2000) Re-embedding global agriculture: the international organic and fair trade movements. Agr Hum Val 17(3):297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith N (2015) Palms and people in the Amazon. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Standards Australia (2015) Our organisation. http://www.standards.org.au/OurOrganisation/AboutUs/Pages/History.aspx. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  46. Teisl M (2003) What we may have is a failure to communicate: labelling and environmentally certified forest products. Forest Sci 49(5):668–680Google Scholar
  47. Tellman B et al (2011) Not fair enough: historic and institutional barriers to fair trade coffee in El Salvador. J Lat Am Geogr 10(2):107–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thampaplillai D et al (2015) Australian commercial law. Cambridge University Press, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  49. Thrupp LA (2000) Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: the valuable role of sustainable agriculture. Int Aff 76(2):265–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vira B et al (2015) Introduction: forests, trees and landscapes for food security and nutrition. In: Vira B, Wildburger C, Mansourian S (eds) Forests and food: addressing hunger and nutrition across sustainable landscapes. Cambridge, UK, pp 9–28Google Scholar
  51. Waltner-Toews D, Lang T (2000) A new conceptual base for food and agricultural policy: the emerging model of links between agriculture, food, health, environment and society. Global Change Hum Health 1(2):116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weinstein S, Moegenburge S (2004) Acai palm management in the Amazon estuary course for conservation or passage to plantations? Conservat Soc 2(2):315–346Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hope Johnson
    • 1
  • Christine Parker
    • 2
  • Rowena Maguire
    • 1
  1. 1.Queensland University of Technology School of Law, International Law and Global and Governance Research ProgramBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.School of LawUniversity of MelbourneCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations