Do you Like to be an Aspirational Referee to Promote a Product? Act Like a Celebrity in Emerging Market

  • Mahmud A. Shareef
  • Vinod Kumar
  • Uma Kumar
  • Mohammad Abdallah Ali Alryalat
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Theory and Practice of Emerging Markets book series (ATPEM)

Abstract

Since in emerging market, social network like Facebook is a common platform to generate collective opinion as an opinion leader, viral advertisement promoted by any member and shared among peers of their network has potential contribution in shaping favorable attitude. This study is designed to understand attitude of members of social network to be persuaded by any promotional marketing-related messages in terms of its effectiveness and ability to pursue them to be motivated. Precisely, it is aimed to derive the factors which have an influence in perusing attitude toward any message generated, distributed, and shared among the members of a common social loop. Five interdependent factors, namely, message initiator (identity), message language (informality), message content (logic and counter logic), message entertainment (hedonic motivation), and message reliability (experience based), are constructed as the independent variables to understand attitude of members of social media toward any promotional message in an emerging market context.

Keywords

Emerging market Facebook Viral marketing Product promotion Advertisement Consumer attitude 

Reference

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akar, E., & Topcu, B. (2011). An examination of the factors influencing consumer’s attitudes toward social media marketing. Journal of Internet Commerce, 10(1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AlAlwan, A., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Algharabat, R. (2017). Social media in marketing: A review and analysis of the existing literature. Telematics and Informatics. Available at  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu, S.-C. (2011). Viral advertising in social media: Participation in Facebook groups and responses among college-aged users. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(1), 30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science., 32(5), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. di Pietro, L., & Pantano, E. (2012). An empirical investigation of social network influence on consumer purchasing decision: The case of Facebook. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 14(1), 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ducoffe, R. H. (1996). Advertising value and advertising on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5), 21–35.Google Scholar
  8. Dwivedi, Y. K., Kapoor, K. K., & Chen, H. (2015). Social media marketing and advertising. The Marketing Review, 15(3), 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dwivedi, Y. K.,Mäntymäki, M., Ravishankar, M. N., Janssen, M., Clement, M., Slade, E. L., Rana, N. P., Al-Sharhan, S. &Simintiras, A. C. (Eds.) (2016). Social media: The good, the bad, and the ugly: 15th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2016, Swansea, UK, September 13–15, 2016, Proceedings (Vol. 9844). Springer. URL: http://www.springer.com/gb/book/9783319452333.Google Scholar
  10. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Alryalat, M. A. A. (2017). Affiliate marketing: An overview and analysis of emerging literature. The Marketing Review, 17(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2017). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, 1–16. Available at https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s 10796-017-9774-y.
  12. Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Tajvidi, M., Lal, B., Sahu, G. P., & Gupta, A. (2017), Exploring the role of social media in e-Government: an analysis of emerging literature. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 97–106). ACM, 7th to 10th March 2017, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
  13. Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-construal, reference groups, and brand meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3), 378–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hayes, J. L., & King, K. W. (2014). The social exchange of viral ads: Referral and coreferral of ads among college students. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 14(2), 98–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hogg, M. A., & Vaughan, G. M. (2002). Social psychology (3rd ed.). London, UK: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Hughes, A. L. & Palen, L. (2009). Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events. In Proceedings of the 6th International ISCRAM Conference, Sweden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ismagilova, E., Dwivedi, Y.K., Slade, E.L. & Williams, M.D. (2017). Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) in the Marketing Context: A State of the Art Analysis and Future Directions. Springer International Publishing. Available at http://www.springer.com/us/book/ 9783319524580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jarad, G. A. (2014). Marketing over social media networks. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(13), 114–118.Google Scholar
  19. Kapoor, K. K., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Metamorphosis of Indian electoral campaigns: Modi's social media experiment. International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, 11(4), 496–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kapoor, K. K., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Piercy, N. C. (2016). Pay-per-click advertising: A literature review. The Marketing Review, 16(2), 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, A. J., & Ko, E. (2012). Do social media marketing activities enhance customer equity? An empirical study of luxury fashion brand. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1480–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. LaRose, R., Mastro, D. A., & Eastin, M. S. (2001). Understanding internet usage: A social cognitive approach to uses and gratifications. Social Science Computer Review, 19(4), 395–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, D., Kim, H. S., & Kim, J. K. (2011). The impact of online brand community type on consumer’s community engagement behaviors: Consumer-created vs. marketer-created online brand community in online social-networking web sites. Cyber Psychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14(1/2), 59–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lessig, V. P., & Park, W. (1978). Promotional perspectives of reference group influence: Advertising implications. Journal of Advertising, 7(2), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lieber, E., & Syverson, C. (2011). Online vs. offline competition. In M. Peitz & J. Waldfogel (Eds.), Oxford handbook for the digital economy (pp. 189–223). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Logan, K., Bright, L. F., & Gangadharbatla, H. (2012). Facebook versus television: Advertising value perceptions among females. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 6(3), 164–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C.-S. (2005). Personal innovativeness social influences and adoption of wireless internet services via mobile technology. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mallat, N. (2007). Exploring consumer adoption of mobile payments – A qualitative study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(4), 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Michael, R. T., & Becker, G. S. (1973). On the new theory of consumer behavior. The Swedish Journal of Economics, 75(4), 378–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mittal, B., & Lassar, W. M. (1996). The role of personalization in service encounters. Journal of Retailing, 72(1), 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nicosia, F. (1966). Consumer decision processes. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Patton, M. Q. (1981). Creative evaluation. San Anselmo, CA: Sage Publications, USA.Google Scholar
  34. Pelling, E., & White, K. M. (2009). The theory of planned behavior applied to young people’s use of social networking websites. Cyber psychology & Behavior, 12(6), 755–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Plume, C. J., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Slade, E. L. (2016). Social Media in the Marketing Context: A state of the art analysis and future directions (1st ed.). Oxford, UK.: Chandos Publishing Ltd. Available athttps://www.elsevier.com/books/social-media-in-the-marketing-context/plume/978-0-08-101754-8 Google Scholar
  36. Rothschild, M. L. (1981). Behavioral learning theory: Its relevance to marketing and promotions. Journal of Marketing, 45. (Spring, 70–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schulze, C., Scholer, L., & Skiera, B. (2014). Not all fun and games: Viral marketing for utilitarian products. Journal of Marketing, 78, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shareef, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Kumar, V. (2016). Mobile Marketing Channel: Mobile Phone SMS & Online Consumer Behavior. USA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shareef, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2015). Consumer behavior in the context of SMS-based marketing. The Marketing Review, 15(2), 135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Dwivedi, Y. K., Kumar, U. (2016), Service delivery through mobile-government (mGov): Driving factors and cultural impacts. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(2), 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shiau, W. L., & Luo, M. M. (2012). Factors affecting online group buying intention and satisfaction: A social exchange theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2431–2444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Singer, E. (1981). Reference Groups and Social Evaluations. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social Psychology (pp. 66–93). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  43. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Taylor, D. G., Lewin, J. E., & Strutton, D. (2011). Friends, fans, and followers: Do ads work on social networks. Journal of Advertising Research, 51(1), 258–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahmud A. Shareef
    • 1
  • Vinod Kumar
    • 2
  • Uma Kumar
    • 2
  • Mohammad Abdallah Ali Alryalat
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Business & Economics, North South UniversityDhakaBangladesh
  2. 2.Sprott School of Business Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Al-Balqa’ Applied UniversitySaltJordan

Personalised recommendations