Advertisement

Profitability of Cassava Based Farms Adopting Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) Practices in Delta State, Nigeria

  • Anthony O. OnojaEmail author
  • Joshua Agbomedarho
  • Ibisime Etela
  • Eunice N. Ajie
Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

This study assessed the profitability of Climate Smart Agriculture (CSA) practices adopted by cassava based farmers in Delta State, Nigeria. It also ascertained the differences in profits between the CSAs and then evaluated the determinants of their profits. Primary data were collected from 120 farmers with the aid of a structured questionnaire and a Focused Group Discussion approach. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Gross Margin, OLS regression models and Friedman test statistic. Findings indicated that the CSAs practiced by the farmers were crop rotation (91.8%), bush fallowing (80.0%), use of organic manure (73.3%), agro-forestry (40%) and multiple cropping (55%). The mean gross margin estimates for multiple cropping, monocropping and agro-forestry were $1684, $146.07 and $700 respectively. There was a significant variation in the profitability of the three farming systems. Extension service, CSA adoption, farming experience and sex were the major determinants of profitability in the cassava farms operating the CSAs. Based on the findings, it was recommended that agricultural extension services be provided to boost productivity of CSA practices in the crop farms; while policies that will encourage CSA adoption (especially agro-forestry and multiple cropping) should be put in place. Gender mainstreaming in the CSA adoption should also be encouraged by relevant authorities.

Keywords

Climate smart agriculture Farm productivity Resilience against climate change Food security Agribusiness 

References

  1. CCAFS and UNFAO (2014) Questions & answers: knowledge on climate-smart agriculture. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (UNFAO), RomeGoogle Scholar
  2. Conover (1999) Practical nonparametric statistics, 3rd edn. Wiley, pp 367–373. Available at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/software/dataplot/refman1/auxillar/friedman.htm. Accessed on 12 Nov 2015
  3. Delta (2011) Encyclopedia Britannica. In: Encyclopedia Britannica ultimate reference suite. Encyclopedia Britannica, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Egesi C, Mbanasor E, Ogbe F, Okogbenin E, Fregene M (2006) Development of cassava varieties with high value root quality through induced mutations and marker-aided breeding. NRCRI Umudike annual report 2006, pp 2–6Google Scholar
  5. Federal Republic of Nigeria (2007) Official gazette 94:24Google Scholar
  6. FAO (2009a) Food security and agricultural mitigation in developing countries: options for capturing synergies. Rome, pp 17–18Google Scholar
  7. FAO (2009b) Harvesting agriculture’s multiple benefits: mitigation, adaptation, development and food security. Rome. Retrieved on 23 Feb 2017 from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6881e.pdf
  8. Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO (2010) Climate-smart agriculture: policies, practices and financing for food security, adaptation and mitigation. http://tinyurl.com/65nfr7k
  9. FAO (2017) The future of food and agriculture-trends and challenges. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. In: Contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Jagtap S (2007) Managing vulnerability to extreme weather and climate events: Implications for agriculture and food security in Africa. In: Proceedings of the international conference on climate change and economic sustainability held at Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Enugu, Nigeria, pp 12–14Google Scholar
  12. National Bureau of Statistics (2006) National population census. Federal Government of Nigeria, AbujaGoogle Scholar
  13. Neufeldt H, Jahn M, Campbell BM, Beddington JR, DeClerck F, De Pinto A, Zougmoré R (2013) Beyond climate-smart agriculture: toward safe operating spaces for global food systems. Agric Food Secur 2(12):10–1186Google Scholar
  14. National Bureau of Statistics (2006b) Population census. Federal Republic of Nigeria, AbujaGoogle Scholar
  15. Nigerian Meterological Agency (NIMET) (2012) Nigerian climate review. NIMET, Abuja. Retrieved on 20 Feb 2015 from http://www.nimet.gov.ng/sites/default/files/publications/2012%20NIGERIAN%20CLIMATE%20REVIEW%20EDIT.docx
  16. NIMET (2013) Seasonal rainfall prediction (SRP). NIMET, AbujaGoogle Scholar
  17. Odjugo PAO (2010) General overview of climate change impacts in Nigeria. J Hum Eco 29(1):47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rosenzweig C, Livewrman D (1992) Predicted effects of climate change on agriculture: a comparison of temperate and tropical regions. In: Majumdar SK (ed) Global climate change: implications, challenges, and mitigation measures. The Pennsylvania Academy of Science, PA, pp 342–361Google Scholar
  19. Udah SC, Nwachukwu IN, Nwosu AC, Mbanasor JA, Akpan SB (2015) Analysis of contribution of various agricultural subsectors to growth in Nigeria agricultural sector. Int J Agric For Fish 3(3):80–86Google Scholar
  20. World Bank (2011) Climate-smart agriculture: a call to action. Retrieved from http://tinyurl.com/6kkvnv4

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony O. Onoja
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joshua Agbomedarho
    • 1
  • Ibisime Etela
    • 2
  • Eunice N. Ajie
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Economics and ExtensionUniversity of Port HarcourtPort HarcourtNigeria
  2. 2.Department of Animal ScienceUniversity of Port HarcourtPort HarcourtNigeria
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural SciencesIgnatius Ajuru University of EducationPort HarcourtNigeria

Personalised recommendations