Advertisement

Multifunctional Urban Agriculture and Agroforestry for Sustainable Land Use Planning in the Context of Climate Change in Serbia

  • Jelena Živanović MiljkovićEmail author
  • Tijana Crnčević
Chapter
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Faced with the various developments and modern lifestyle trends of urban dwellers toward healthy food and closer contact with nature, people in urban areas have evolved extensive forms of urban agriculture and agroforestry to meet their needs. Urban agriculture and agroforestry systems, as a part of multifunctional landscapes, have various positive effects (they support urban climate amelioration and short food chains, provide fresh food, contribute to urban economic growth, conserve biodiversity, and have therapeutic qualities). However, competing land use needs and the high value of land in urban areas are the major challenges for the development of urban agriculture and agroforestry. In this chapter, the authors analyse urban agriculture and agroforestry as multifunctional and sustainable land use options for urban areas in Serbia. Through selected case studies, the authors give an overview of the physical, planning and institutional capacities for urban agriculture and agroforestry development in Serbia. The authors also identify trends in urban agriculture and agroforestry within the context of the impact of climate change on multifunctional landscapes.

Keywords

Urban agriculture and agroforestry Multifunctional land use Climate change Sustainable land use planning Serbia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The paper was prepared as a result of work on scientific projects: “The role and implementation of the national spatial plan and regional development documents in renewal of strategic research, thinking and governance in Serbia” (No. III 47014) and “Sustainable spatial development of the Danube region in Serbia” (No. TR 36036), financed by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia in the period 2011–2019.

References

  1. Bastaliste (2017) First community garden in Serbia. http://bastaliste.org/about. Accessed 20 May 2017
  2. City of Sabac (2016) First year of the urban garden. http://sabac.rs/aktuelnosti/vesti/prva-godina-gradske-baste.htm. Accessed 20 May 2017
  3. Crncevic T (2013) Planning and protection of nature, natural values and landscape in the context of climate change in Republic of Serbia—contribution to the development of methodological framework. Speacial editions, No 72. IAUS, Belgrade (in Serbian)Google Scholar
  4. Crncevic T, Bakic O (2008) The system of green surfaces in spas with special reference to the case studies: Vrnjacka, Kanjiza and Pribojska spa. Spatium 17(18):92–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crncevic T, Sekulic M (2012) Green Roofs in the context of climate change—overview of new experiences. Arhitektura i urbanizam 36:57–67 (in Serbian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crncevic T, Manic B, Maric I (2015) Green walls of urban spaces in the context of climate change—an overview of the actual planning frameworks and experiences. Arhitektura i urbanizam 41:40–48 (in Serbian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crncevic T, Jokic V, Bezbradica L (2016a) Planning energy crops in Serbia with special reference to the fast growing forest. In: Stevic Z (ed) Proceedings 4th International Conference on Renewable Electrical Power Sources, Belgrade, October 2016, Union of Mechanical and Electrotechnical Engineers and Technicians of Serbia (SMEITS) Society for Renewable Electrical Power Sources, pp 229–237Google Scholar
  8. Crncevic T, Dzelebdzic O, Milijic S (2016b) Planning and climate change: a case study on the spatial plan of the danube corridor through Serbia. In: Leal Filho W et al (eds) Implementing climate change adaptation in cities and communities, climate change management, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 161–177Google Scholar
  9. Drazic D, Cule N, Veselinovic M, Rakonjac Lj, Bojovic S, Mitrovic S, Todorovic N (2013) Agroforestry—possibilities of multifunctional land use. In: Kovacevic D (ed) Book of proceedings IV international symposium “Agrosym 2013”, Jahorina, pp 867–872Google Scholar
  10. Drilling M, Giedych R, Ponizy L (2016) The idea of allotment gardens and the role of spatial and urban planning. In: Bell S, Fox-Kämper R, Keshavarz N, Benson M, Caputo S, Noori S, Voigt A (eds) Urban allotment gardens in europe. Routledge, New York, pp 35–61Google Scholar
  11. E-kapija (2010) CDM projects in Serbia. http://www.ekapija.com/website/sr/company/photoArticle.php?id=349989&path=ekologija_150414.j. Accessed 15 Feb 2017
  12. FAO (2008) Urban agriculture for sustainable poverty alleviation and food security. WB paper, http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/FCIT/PDF/UPA_-WBpaper-Final_October_2008.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2017
  13. FAO (2013) Advancing agroforestry on the policy agenda a guide for decision-makers. By G. Buttoud, in collaboration with O. Ajayi, G. Detlefsen, F. Place & E. Torquebiau. Agroforestry Working Paper no 1. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Jurekova Z, Drazic G (ed) (2011) External and internal factors influencing the growth and biomass production of short rotation woods genus Salix and perennial grass Miscanthus. Faculty of applied ecology FUTURA, Singidunum University Belgrade. Available via https://is.uniag.sk/dok_server/slozka.pl?id=8311;download=6339;z=1. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
  15. Kandji ST, Verchot LV, Mackensen J (2006) Climate change and variability in southern africa: impacts and adaptation in the agricultural sector. UNEP, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  16. Lovell ST (2010) Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning. Sustainability 2:2499–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lovell ST, Taylor JR (2013) Supplying urban ecosystem services through multifunctional green infrastructure in the United States. Landscape Ecol 28:1447–1463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maier L, Shobayashi M (2001) Multifunctionality. Towards an analitycal framework. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Manic B, Crncevic T, Nikovic A (2011) The role of green spaces within the spatial-functional concept of block 23 in Bela Crkva. Arhitektura i urbanizam 33:67–74 (in Serbian)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maric I, Crncevic T, Cvejic J (2015) Green infrastructure planning for cooling urban communities: overview of the contemporary approaches with special reference to Serbian experiences. Spatium 33:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mougeot LJA (2006) Growing better cities: Urban agriculture for sustainable development. International Development Research Centre, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  22. Nair RPK (1994) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  23. OECD (2001) Multifunctionality0 Towards an analitycal framework. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Piorr A, Uthes S, Waarts Y, Sattler C, Happe K, Müller K (2006) Making the multifunctionality concepts operational for impact assessment. In: Meyer BC (ed) Sustainable land use in intensively used agricultural regions. Wageningen, Alterra, pp 47–54Google Scholar
  25. Popovic V, Zivanovic Miljkovic J (2013) Community gardening and urban permaculture design. In: Cvijanović D, Subić J, Vasile AJ (eds) International scientific conference sustainable agriculture and rural development in terms of the republic of Serbia strategic goals realization within the Danube region—achieving regional competitiveness, thematic proceedings. Institute of Agricultural Economics, Belgrade, pp 1265–1282Google Scholar
  26. RB Kolubara (2012) First planted fast-growing forests. www.rbkolubara.rs/list-kolubara/?p=7186. Accessed 22 Dec 2016
  27. Silber R, Wytrzens HK (2006) Supporting multifunctionality of agriculture in intensively used urban regions—a case study in Linz/Urfahr (Upper Austria). In: Meyer BC (ed) Sustainable land use in intensively used agricultural regions. Alterra Reports No. 1338, Landscape Europe, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  28. Turpin N, Stapleton L, Perret E, van der Heide CM, Garrod G, Brouwer F, Voltr V, Cairol D (2010) Assessment of multifunctionality and jointness of production. In: Brouwer FM, van Ittersum M (eds) Environmental and agricultural modelling: integrated approaches for policy impact assessment. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 11–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. UNFCCC (The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change) (2017) Paris agreement—status of ratification. Alailable via: http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php. Accessed 15 Aug 2016
  30. Urban Agriculture Committee of the Community Food Security Coalition (CFSC) (2003) Urban agriculture and community food security in the United States: farming from the city center to the urban fringe. Available at: http://community-wealth.org/sites/clone.community-we alth.org/files/downloads/report-brown-carter.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2016
  31. Van Huylenbroeck G, Van Hecke E, Meert H, Vandermeulen V, Verspecht A, Vernimmen T, Boulanger A, Luyten S (2005) Development strategies for multifunctional agriculture in peri-urban areas. Available via: http://www.belspo.be/belspo/organisation/publ/pub_ostc/cpagr/rappcp18r_en.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2016
  32. Verchot LV, Van Noordwijk M, Kandji S, Tomich T, Ong C, Albrecht A, Mackensen J, Bantilan C, Anupama KV, Palm C (2007) Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12:901–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zasada I (2011) Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—a review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy 28(4):639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zivanovic Miljkovic J (2008) Some measures for soil regulation in Belgrade peri-urban zone. Spatium 17(18):68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zivanovic Miljkovic J, Crncevic T, Maric I (2012) Land use planning for sustainable development of peri-urban zones. Spatium 28:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zivanovic Miljkovic J, Popovic V (2014) Land use regulation and property rights regime over land in Serbia. Spatium 32:22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National regulative, strategies and plans

  1. Biodiversity Strategy for the period 2011 to 2018, Official Gazette of RS, No 13/11Google Scholar
  2. Forestry Development Strategy, Official Gazette of RS, No 59/2006Google Scholar
  3. Law on Agricultural Land, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 62/2006, 65/2008—other law, 41/2009, 112/2015Google Scholar
  4. Law on Energy, Official Gazette of the RS, No 145/2014Google Scholar
  5. Law on Environmental Impact Assessment, Official Gazette of RS no. 135/2004.36/2009Google Scholar
  6. Law on Environmental Protection, Official Gazette of RS no. 135/2004… 14/2016Google Scholar
  7. Law on forests, Official Gazette of the RS no. 30/2010, 93/2012, 89/2015Google Scholar
  8. Law on Incentives in Agriculture and Rural Development, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 10/2013, 142/2014, 103/2015Google Scholar
  9. Law on Nature Protection, Official gazette of RS no. 36/2009, 88/2010, 91/2010—correction and 14/2016Google Scholar
  10. Law on planning and contruction, Official Gazette of the RS no.72/09, 81/09—correction, 64/10, 24/11,121/12, 42/13, 50/13, 98/13, 132/14 and 145/14Google Scholar
  11. Law on Spatial plan of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 88/10Google Scholar
  12. Law on Strategic Environmental Assessment, Official Gazette of RS no. 88/2010Google Scholar
  13. Master plan of Belgrade 2021, Official Gazette of the City of Belgrade, No. 27/03, 25/05, 34/07, 63/09 and 70/14Google Scholar
  14. Master Plan of the City of Bor, Official Gazette of the Bor municipality no. 20/2015 and 21/2015Google Scholar
  15. National Strategy for Suistanable Development of the Republic of Serbia, Action plan for the period 2009–2017, Official Gazette of RS, No 57/2008Google Scholar
  16. National Strategy for Sustainable Use of Natural resourses and properties, Official Gazette of RS, No 33/2012Google Scholar
  17. National Strategy for the inclusion of the Republic of Serbia in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)—waste management, agriculture and forestry, Official Gazette of the RS, No 8/2010Google Scholar
  18. National Sustainable Development Strategy of the Republic of Serbia, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 57/08Google Scholar
  19. Plan of Detailed Regulation of Block 23 (setllement Rasadnik 2) in Bela Crkva, Official Gazette of the municipalty Bela Crkva, No 7/2011Google Scholar
  20. RS (Republic of Serbia) (2013) National action plan for renewable energy sources of the republic of Serbia (NAPRES). Available via: http://energetskiportal.rs/dokumenta/Strategije/Nacionali%20akcioni%20plan%20za%20obnovljive%20izvore%20energije.pdf. Accessed 15 Sep 2016
  21. RS (Republic of Serbia) (2017) Second report of republic of serbia after united nations framework convention on climate change. Available via: http://www.klimatskepromene.rs/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/SNC_na-misljenje.pdf. Accessed 15 Apr 2017
  22. Strategy of Agricultural Development of the City of Belgrade unitil 2015. Available via: http://www.beograd.rs/lat/gradska-vlast/1613406-strategija-razvoja-poljoprivrede-grada-beograda-do-2015/. Accessed 20 Nov 2013
  23. Strategy of agriculture and Rural Development 2014-2020, Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 85/2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jelena Živanović Miljković
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tijana Crnčević
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of SerbiaBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations