Advertisement

Translating Evidence into Practice

Chapter

Abstract

We are at a crucial stage in understanding the issues involved in translating public health evidence for urban planning and transport planning into practice. The city is now the preferred human habitat, yet we seem to be building into its very fabric complex challenges to health. The rise in non-communicable disease, increase in health inequity and the need to better support wellbeing are global concerns. Although we are generating public health evidence in an attempt to provide solutions, the gap between what we think we know, and what we do, never seems to get any narrower. This chapter explores the tensions and the arguments and proposes possible solutions for those involved in this struggle, be they researchers or practitioners. The city is the laboratory for change and the subject. But its complexity and its adaptability make it a laboratory like no other. And as a subject, it responds to our interventions with unpredictability. We need a new transdisiplinary science, not the business as usual of built environment and transport, and beyond the traditional evidence hierarchy of the public health world. New actors and new approaches are needed in the research arena. We need strong advocacy to support good evidence. We need to blend tactical urbanism with action research. And for that sake of future population health; city leadership, from many quarters, needs to learn how to collaborate for co-generation of new knowledge that will make a difference to people’s lives.

References

  1. Ball, K., et al. (2007). Personal, social and environmental determinants of educational inequalities in walking: A multilevel study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 61, 108–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton, H., & Grant, M. (2006). A health map for the local human habitat. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 126(6), 252–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466424006070466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumbusch, J., et al. (2008). Pursuing common agendas: A collaborative model of knowledge translation between research and practice in clinical settings. Research in Nursing and Health, 31, 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentley, M. (2014). An ecological public health approach to understanding the relationships between sustainable urban environments, public health and social equity. Health Promotion International, 29(3), 528–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braubach, M., & Grant, M. (2010). Evidence review on the spatial determinants of health in urban settings. In Annex 2 in urban planning, environment and health: From evidence to policy action. Meeting report (pp. 22–97). Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/12071.Google Scholar
  6. Burns, H. (2014). What causes health? The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 44, 103–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cairney, P., Oliver, K., & Wellstead, A. (2016). To bridge the divide between evi-dence and policy: Reduce ambiguity as much as uncertainty. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, H. (2012). Planning to change the world: Between knowledge and action lies synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmichael, L., Barton, H., Gray, S., Lease, H., & Pilkington, P. (2012). Integration of health into urban spatial planning through impact assessment: Identifying governance and policy barriers and facilitators. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32, 187–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carmichael, L., Lock, K., Sweeting, D., Townshend, T., Fischer, T. B., & TCPA. (2016). Evidence base for health and planning lessons from an ESRC seminar series. Town and Country Planning, 85(11), 461–464.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, J., & Chan, J. (2000). Medicine in the millennium: The challenge of postmodernism. Medical Journal of Australia, 17, 332–334.Google Scholar
  12. Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2011). Developing and evaluating complex interventions. London: Medical Research Council.Google Scholar
  13. Croucher, K., Myers, L., Jones, R., Ellaway, A., & Beck, S. (2007). Health and the physical characteristics of urban neighbourhoods: A critical literature review. Glasgow: Centre for Population Health.Google Scholar
  14. Dahlgren G, Whitehead M (1991). “The main determinants of health” model, version accessible. In: Dahlgren G, and Whitehead M. (2007) European strategies for tackling social inequities in Dahlgren, G. and Whitehead, M., 2006. European strategies for tackling social inequities in health: Levelling up Part 2. Copenhagen: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  15. Davies, H. T. O. H., Nutley, S. M. S., & Smith, P. C. P. (1999). What works? The role of evidence in public sector policy and practice (Editorial). Public Money and Management, 19(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9302.00144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davies, P., 2005. Evidence-based policy at the Cabinet Office — ODI: 17 October 2005, Impact and insight series. Retrieved from https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/events-documents/2866.pdf.Google Scholar
  17. Davies, P. T. (1999). What is evidence-based education? British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, A. (2005). Transport and health - What is the connection? An exploration of concepts ofhealth held by highways committee Chairs in England. Transport Policy, 12(4), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, A. 2016 Population strategies and the prevention paradox as applied to road safety in Bristol: A public health approach. Paper presented at Road Safety GB Annual Conference, Bristol, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Dooris, M. (2006). Healthy settings: challenges to generating evidence of effectiveness. Health Promotion International, 21(1), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Francis, J., Giles-Corti, B., Wood, L., & Knuiman, M. (2012a). Creating sense of community: The role of public space. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Francis, J., Wood, L. J., Knuiman, M., & Giles-Corti, B. (2012b). Quality or quantity? Exploring the relationship between public open space attributes and mental health in Perth, Western Australia. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1570–1577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giles-Corti, B., Foster, S., Shilton, T., & Falconer, R. (2010). The co-benefits for health of investing in active transportation, NSW. Public Health Bulletin, 21(5-6), 122–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giles-Corti, B., Sallis, J. F., & Sugiyama, T. (2015). Translating active living research into policy and practice: One important pathway to chronic disease prevention. Journal of Public Health Policy, 36, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2014.53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Graham, H., & White, P. C. L. (2016). Social determinants and lifestyles: Integrating environmental and public health perspectives. Public Health, 141, 270–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2016.09.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grant, M. (2015). European Healthy City Network Phase V: Patterns emerging for healthy urban planning. Health Promotion International, 30(suppl 1), i54–i70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grant, M., Brown, C., Caiaffa, W. T., Capon, A., Corburn, J., Coutts, C., Crespo, C. J., Ellis, G., Ferguson, G., Fudge, C., & Hancock, T. (2017). Cities and health: An evolving global conversation. Cities and Health, 1, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gray, J. (2013). The silence of animals: On progress and other modern myths. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  29. Gustat, J., et al. (2012). Effect of changes to the neighbourhood built environment on physical activity in a low-income African American neighbourhood. Preventing Chronic Disease, 9, 110. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haack, S. (1995). Evidence and inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Hadorn, D. C., Baker, D., Hodges, J. S., & Hicks, N. (1996). Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 49, 749–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Halpern, D. (1995). Mental health and the built environment: More than bricks and mortar. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.Google Scholar
  33. Hambleton, R. (2013). Place-based leadership: New possibilities for planning? In Association of European Schools of Planning/Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning, Dublin, Ireland, 15–19th July 2013. Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/21796.Google Scholar
  34. Hambleton, R. (2015). Place-based collaboration: Leadership for a changing world. Administration, 63(3), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hammersley, M. (2002). Systematic or unsystematic: Is that the question? Some reflections on the science, art, and politics of reviewing research evidence. Public Health Evidence Steering Group of the Health Development Agency.Google Scholar
  36. Hanlon, P., Carlisle, S., Hannah, M., Lyon, A., & Reilly, D. (2012). A perspective on the future public health: An integrative and ecological framework. Perspectives in Public Health, 132(6), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757913912440781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hippocrates. (1849). On air, waters, and places. In The genuine works of Hippocrates. New York: W. Wood. Translated with a commentary by Francis Adams. London: The Sydenham Society.Google Scholar
  38. Holmes, B., Best, A., Davies, H., Hunter, D. J., Kelly, M., Marshall, M., & Rycroft-Malone, J. (2016). Mobilising knowledge in complex health systems: A call to action. Evidence and Policy, 13, 539–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Freeman, H. L. (Ed.). (1985). Mental health and the environment. London: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
  40. Hunter, D. J., & Shelina, V. (2016). Better evidence for smarter policy making. British Medical Journal, 355, i6399. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2756072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jones, A., & Seelig, T. (2005). Enhancing research-policy linkages in Australian housing: An options paper (pp. 1–46). Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI).Google Scholar
  42. Jones, R., & Yates, G. (2013). The built environment and health: An evidence review. Briefing paper 11. Glasgow: Centre for Population Health.Google Scholar
  43. Juntti, M., Russell, D., & Turnpenny, J. (2009). Evidence, politics and power in public policy for the environment. Environmental Science and Policy, 12, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kelly, M. P., Morgan, A., Bonnefoy, J., Butt, J., & Bergman, V. (2007). The social determinants of health: Developing an evidence base for political action.Google Scholar
  45. Kent, J., Thompson, S. M., & Jalaludin, B. (2011). Healthy built environments: A review of the literature. Sydney: Healthy Built Environments Program, City Futures Research Centre, UNSW.Google Scholar
  46. Kent, J., & Thompson, S. (2012). Health and the built environment: Exploring foundations for a new interdisciplinary profession. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2012, 958175. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/958175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Khangura, S., Konnyu, K., Cushman, R., Grimshaw, J., & Moher, M. (2012). Evidence summaries: The evolution of a rapid review approach. Systematic Reviews, 1, 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Khreis, H., van Nunen, E., Mueller, N., Zandieh, R., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2017). Commentary: How to create healthy environments in cities. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 28(1), 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kickbusch, I. (2008). Policy innovation for health. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Krieger, N. (1992). The making of public health data: Paradigms, politics, and policy. Journal of Public Health Policy, 13, 412–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lang, T., & Rayner, G. (2012). Ecological public health: The 21st century’s big idea? An essay by Tim Lang and Geof Rayner. British Medical Journal, 345(1306), e5466. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lavin, T., Higgins, C., Metcalfe, O., & Jordan, A. (2006). Health impacts of the built environment: A review. Dublin, Belfast: Institute of Public Health in Ireland.Google Scholar
  53. Lawrence, R. J. (2015). Advances in transdisciplinarity: Epistemologies, methodologies and processes. Futures, 65, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lawrence, R. J. (2004). Housing and health: From interdisciplinary principles to transdisciplinary research and practice. Futures, 36(4), 487–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lawrence, R. J. (2010). Deciphering interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary contributions. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 1(1), 125–130.Google Scholar
  56. LGA. (2016). Health in all policies: A manual for local government. London: Local Government Association.Google Scholar
  57. Litman, T. (2003). Integrating public health objectives in transportation decision-making. American Journal of Health Promotion, 18(1), 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Liyanage, C., Elhag, T., Ballal, T., & Qiuping, L. (2009). Knowledge communication and translation – A knowledge transfer model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 118–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lovasi, G. S., Mooney, S., DiMaggio, C. J., & Muennig, P. A. (2016). Cause and context: Place-based approaches to investigate how environments affect mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51(12), 1571–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Marmot, M., Friel, S., Bell, R., Houweling, T. A., & Taylor, S. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1661–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Marshall, R., & Godfrey. (2006). Using evidence in practice: What do health professionals really do? A study of care and support for breastfeeding women in primary care. Clinical Effectiveness, 953, e181–e190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Milewa, T., & Barry, C. (2005). Health policy and the politics of evidence. Social Policy and Administration, 39(5), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Murdoch, J., & Clarke, J. (1994). Sustainable knowledge. Geoforum, 25(2), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Muriel, F., & Autant-Bernard, C. (2013). Knowledge diffusion and innovation within the European regions: Challenges based on recent empirical evidence. Research Policy, 41(1), 196–201.Google Scholar
  65. Parkhurst, J. O. (2016). Appeals to evidence for the resolution of wicked problems: The origins and mechanisms of evidentiary bias. Policy Sciences, 49, 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9263-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Parsons, W. (2002). From muddling through to muddling up – Evidence based policy making and the modernisiation of British Government. Public Policy and Administration, 17, 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Peavey, E., & Vander Wyst, K. B. (2017). Evidence-based design and research-informed design: What’s the difference? Conceptual definitions and comparative analysis. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peirson, L., Catallo, C., & Chera, S. (2013). The registry of knowledge translation methods and tools: A resource to support evidence-informed public health. International Journal of Public Health, 58, 493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2003). Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: Horses for courses. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57(7), 527–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Polanyi, M. (1959). Personal knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension, garden city. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  73. Pope, C. (2003). Resisting evidence: The study of evidence-based medicine as a contemporary social movement. Health: An Intersectoral Journal for the Social Study of Health, Illness and Medicine, 7(3), 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Public Health England. (2017). Spatial planning for health: An evidence resource for planning and designing healthier places. London: Public Health England.Google Scholar
  75. Rao, M., Prasad, S., Adshead, F., & Tissera, H. (2007). The built environment and health. The Lancet, 370(9593), 1111–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rodgers, M., et al. (2009). Testing methodological guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews effectiveness of interventions to promote smoke alarm ownership and function. Evaluation, 15(1), 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rosendahl, J., Zanella, M., Rist, S., & Weigelt, J. (2015). Scientists’ situated knowledge: Strong objectivity in transdisciplinarity. Futures, 65, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. (2007). The Urban environment (Vol. 26). London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  80. Rutter, H., & Glonti, K. (2016). Towards a new model of evidence for public health. The Lancet, 388, S7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rutter, H., Savona, N., Glonti, K., Bibby, J., Cummins, S., Finegood, D. T., et al. (2017). Viewpoint: The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health. The Lancet, 6736(17), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31267-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rychetnik, L., & Wise, M. (2004). Advocating evidence-based health promotion: Reflections and a way forward. Health Promotion International, 19(2), 247257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rydin, Y., Bleahu, A., Davies, M., Dávila, J. D., Friel, S., De Grandis, G., Groce, N., Hallal, P. C., Hamilton, I., Howden-Chapman, P., & Lai, K. M. (2012). Shaping cities for health: Complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century. Lancet, 379(9831), 2079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sallis, J. F., Cerin, E., Conway, T. L., Adams, M. A., Frank, L. D., Pratt, M., Salvo, D., Schipperijn, J., Smith, G., Cain, K. L., & Davey, R. (2016). Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: A cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 387(10034), 2207–2217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Schofield, P., & Das-Munshi, J. (2017). New directions in neighbourhood research—A commentary on Lovasi et al. (2016): Cause and context: Place-based approaches to investigate how environments affect mental health. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 52(2), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1332-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  88. Sidhu, K., Jones, R., & Stevenson, F. (2017). Publishing qualitative research in medical journals. The British Journal of General Practice, 67(658), 229–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Smith, N., Baugh Littlejohns, L., & Thompson, D. (2001). Shaking out the cobwebs: Insights into community capacity and its relation to health outcomes. Community Development Journal, 36(1), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Smith, P. C., Nutley, S. M., & Davies, H. T. O. (Eds.). (2000). Urban policy: Addressing wicked problems. What works?: Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  91. Sorrell, S. (2007). Improving the evidence base for energy policy: The role of systematic reviews. Energy Policy, 35(3), 1858–1871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Steiner, F. (2014). Frontiers in urban ecological design and planning research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Swinburn, B. (2001). Prevention of type 2 diabetes, 2001 Prevention needs to reduce obesogenic environments. British Medical Journal, 323(7319), 997.Google Scholar
  94. Jenkins, S. (2017). Post-truth politics will be debunked by online facts. The Guardian. Retrieved July 17, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/26/post-truth-politics-online-facts-donald-trump-lies.Google Scholar
  95. Townshend, T., & Lake, A. (2009). Obesogenic urban form: Theory, policy and practice. Health & Place, 15(4), 909–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Townshend, T. G. (2017). Toxic high streets. Journal of Urban Design, 22(2), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tsouros, A. (2013). City leadership for health and well-being: Back to the future. Journal of Urban Health, 90, 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. UN. (2015). World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/366). New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar
  99. Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. WHO. (2008). International Public Health Symposium on Environment and health research science for policy, Policy for science: Bridging the gap, Madrid, Spain, 20–22 October 2008. Report. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  101. WHO. (1986). Ottawa charter for health promotion. Copenhagen: World Health Organization European Regional Office.Google Scholar
  102. WHO. (1988). Health 21, the Health for all framework for the European region. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  103. WHO. (2009). International Public Health Symposium on Environment and health research science for policy, Policy for science: Bridging the gap, Madrid, Spain, 20–22 October 2008. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.Google Scholar
  104. WHO. (2016). Action plan to strengthen the use of evidence, information and research for policy-making in the WHO European Region. Regional Committee for Europe 66th Session, 12–15 September. Copenhagen: WHO.Google Scholar
  105. Wright, J., Parry, J., & Mathers, J. (2007). What to do about political context? Evidence, synthesis, the New Deal for Communities and the possibilities for evidence-based policy. Evidence and Policy, 3(2), 253–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Stewardship for HealthBristolUK
  2. 2.University of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations