Advertisement

The Boko Haram Insurgency: Characterisation and Implications Under Municipal and International Laws

  • Michael Ibanga
  • James Archibong
Chapter

Abstract

When it started in 2009, the confrontation between Boko Haram members and governmental authorities took the form of unruly behaviour and acts of civil disobedience by some Muslim youth in Maiduguri town and law enforcement measures by government personnel. The ensuing confrontation was limited to Borno State in northeast Nigeria. Later, activities of Boko Haram members extended to sporadic acts of violence against law enforcement and security personnel, followed by arrests, detentions and prosecution by government authorities. Ultimately, the confrontation involved acts of terrorism and armed violence by Boko Haram members, on the one hand, and counterterrorism/counter-insurgency measures by governmental armed forces, on the other hand. Presently, the form, context and geographical spread of the confrontation have markedly changed from what it was in 2009, and it is the status of the conflict in current times that is of interest in this paper. This paper asserts that proper characterisation of the Boko Haram insurgency in northeast Nigeria is important for the application and indeed applicability of certain rules of domestic and international laws, particularly rules of international human rights law and those of international humanitarian law. Appreciating that not every violent confrontation between armed groups and governmental armed forces can qualify as an ‘armed conflict’ and noting also that the status of being an armed conflict entails rights and duties for the belligerent parties, the paper emphasises that proper characterisation of the Boko Haram insurgency is imperative. The notion of armed conflict has not been defined in relevant treaties but has been explained by international judicial tribunals. Employing the criteria set out in judicial decisions, this paper assesses the legal status of Boko Haram insurgency and counter-insurgency measures in order to determine the applicability of certain principles and rules of municipal and international laws.

References

  1. Abi-Saab G (1988) Non-international armed conflicts. In: UNESCO international dimensions of humanitarian law. Henry Dunant Institute, Geneva, pp 217–243Google Scholar
  2. Aljazeera (2015) “Chadian troops join war against Boko Haram” at m.aljazera.com/story last visited 20/1/2015Google Scholar
  3. American Foreign Policy Council, “Boko Haram” World Almanac of Islamism, p 8Google Scholar
  4. Amnesty International, “Nigeria: war crimes and crimes against humanity as violence escalates in north-east” Annual Report 2013 at www.amnesty.org/…/nigeria-war-crimes last visited 18/1/2015
  5. Amnesty International, Nigeria: “more than 1,500 killed in armed conflict in north-eastern Nigeria in early 2014”. Index: AFR 44/004/2014. Amnesty International, March 2014, p 10Google Scholar
  6. Amnesty International, Report 2012. Index: POL 10/001/2012, p 257Google Scholar
  7. Barna J (2014) Insecurity in context: the rise of Boko Haram in Nigeria. Directorate-General for External Policies, Policy Department, p 16Google Scholar
  8. Bartels R (2009) Timelines, borderlines and conflicts. The historical evolution of the legal divide between international and non-international armed conflicts. Int Rev Red Cross 91(873)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BBC, “Who are Nigeria’s Boko Haram Islamists?” at www.bbc.com/…/world-africa-13809501 last visited 23/3/2015Google Scholar
  10. Campbell J (2014) Boko Haram: origins, challenges and responses. NOREF Norwegian Peacebuilding Resource Centre Policy Brief – OctoberGoogle Scholar
  11. Council on Foreign Relations Africa, “Boko Haram control in Northeast Nigeria” at blogs.cfr.org/…/boko-haram-control-in last visited 26/1/2015Google Scholar
  12. Daily Independent, “.7m internally displaced persons in North East Nigeria – UNHCR” available at dailyindependentnig.co last visited 14/2/2015Google Scholar
  13. Daily Sun, “Boko Haram: ICC vows to prosecute crimes in Nigeria” Wednesday, January 21, 2015, Vol. 10, No. 3061Google Scholar
  14. Gasser H (1993) International humanitarian law – an introduction. Henry Dunant Institute, Haupt, p 70Google Scholar
  15. Herskovits J, How American experts allowed growth of Boko Haram. Vanguard at www.vanguardngr.com last visited 18/01/2015
  16. ICRC Commentary on the Four Geneva Conventions of 1949Google Scholar
  17. International Institute of Humanitarian Law (2006) The manual on the law of non-international armed conflict. International Institute of Humanitarian Law, San RemoGoogle Scholar
  18. News 24.com/Nigeria last visited 19/1/2015Google Scholar
  19. Oarhe O (2013) Responses of the Nigerian defense and intelligence establishments to the challenge of Boko Haram. In: Mantzikos I (ed) Boko Haram anatomy of a crisis. e International Relations, Bristol, p 67Google Scholar
  20. Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (n 57)Google Scholar
  21. Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, “Situation in Nigeria,” Article 5 Report, 5 August 2013, pp 21–29Google Scholar
  22. Office of the Spokesperson US Department of State, “Boko Haram and US Counterterrorism Assistance to Nigeria” FACT SHEET May 14, 2014Google Scholar
  23. Ojo EO (2010) Boko Haram: Nigeria’s extra-judicial state. J Sustain Dev Afr 12(12):45–62Google Scholar
  24. Okemi ME (2013) Boko Haram: a religious sect or terrorist organisation. Global J Polit Law Res 1(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Okpaga A, Chijioke US, Innocent EO (2012) Activities of Boko Haram and insecurity question in Nigeria. Arab J Bus Manage Rev (OMAN Chapter) 1(9):86–89Google Scholar
  26. Onapajo H (2013) Why Nigeria is not winning the Anti-Boko Haram War. In: Mantzikos I (ed) Boko Haram anatomy of a crisis. e International Relations, BristolGoogle Scholar
  27. P. M. News Nigeria, “3 Boko Haram members convicted of terror in secret trial” at www pmnews NigeriaGoogle Scholar
  28. Pérouse de Montclos M-A (2014) Nigeria’s interminable insurgency? Addressing the Boko Haram crisis. Chatham House. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Africa Programme, September, p 15Google Scholar
  29. Prosecutor v Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4Google Scholar
  30. Prosecutor v Boskoski and Tarculovski, Judgment (Trial Chamber), Case No. IT-04-82-T, 10 July 2008, paras 175–206Google Scholar
  31. Prosecutor v Ramush Haradinaj, Idriz Balaj and Lahi Brahimaj Judgment (Trial Chamber), Case No. IT-04-84-T, 3 April 2008Google Scholar
  32. Prosecutor v Zenjnil Delalic, Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delalic, Zdravko Mucic, Hazim Delic and Esad Landzo Case No. IT-96-21Google Scholar
  33. Rome Statute BillGoogle Scholar
  34. Siegle J (2013) Boko Haram and the isolation of Northern Nigeria: regional and international implications. In: Mantzikos I (ed) Boko Haram anatomy of a crisis. e International Relations, Bristol, pp 86–87Google Scholar
  35. Sotubo J (2014) Terrorists Amputate 10 under Sharia Law in Mubi. Available at http://www.pulse.ng/news/boko haram. Accessed 19 Jan 2015
  36. “Terrorists Amputate 10 under Sharia Law in Mubi” at Pulse.ng/news/boko haram last visited 19/1/2015Google Scholar
  37. The Geneva Conventions Act, Laws of the Federation 2004Google Scholar
  38. The Nation, February 20, 2014, Vol. 9, No. 2765, p 1Google Scholar
  39. The Nation, Wednesday, February 26, 2014, Vol. 9, No. 2771, p 1Google Scholar
  40. The Nigerian Coalition for the International Criminal Court, “NCICC calls on Nigeria to pass International Crimes Bill” NCICC Press Release Abuja 1 August 2014Google Scholar
  41. The Prosecutor v Boskoski, Case No. IT 04-82-T, Judgment (Trial Chamber II) 10 July 2008, para 193Google Scholar
  42. The Prosecutor v Tadic, Case No. IT-94-1, Judgment (Trial Chamber) 7 May 1997Google Scholar
  43. The Prosecutor v Tadic, Case No. IT-94-1-AR72, Merits (Appeals Chamber), 2 October 1995, para 70Google Scholar
  44. The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Judgment pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, ICC - 01/04-01/06 (14 March 2012)Google Scholar
  45. The Punch, “18 Soldiers on trial for aiding Boko Haram” at www.punchng.com last visited 18/1/2015Google Scholar
  46. The Punch, “Boko Haram: ECOWAS mulls regional force” at www.punchng.com/…/boko-haram-ecow last visited 20/1/2015Google Scholar
  47. The Vanguard, “Boko Haram Sponsorship: No Secret Trial for Ndume” at www.vanguardngr.com last visited 19/1/2015Google Scholar
  48. Tribune, “Boko Haram, other wars render 750,000 stateless in West Africa – UN agency” at tribune. Com.ng/…/book-haram/12855 last visited 18/1/2015Google Scholar
  49. Walker A (2012) What is Boko Haram? United States Institute for Peace, SPECIAL REPORT 308, JuneGoogle Scholar
  50. Zenn J, Pearson E (2014) Women, gender and the evolving tactics of Boko Haram. J Terrorism Res 5(1) (Special Issue)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Ibanga
    • 1
  • James Archibong
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of CalabarCalabarNigeria

Personalised recommendations