Advertisement

International Law Response to Terrorism: Boko Haram in Perspective

  • Udoka Ndidiamaka OwieEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Al-Qaida, the Islamic State, Boko Haram, Al-Shabaab and Ansar Dine are names identified with terror in contemporary times. The growing political and economic divide between individuals and States has fuelled a culture of extremism and intolerance with the consequent empathy for terrorism, the growth of terrorist networks and the financing of terrorism. The security crisis in the Northeastern part of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, due to the activities of the Boko Haram group, has caused a humanitarian crisis that has imperilled millions of lives, especially vulnerable groups like children, as well as implicated a response from neighbouring States, thereby resulting in an international crisis. The prevalence, scale and devastation of the terrorist attacks of Boko Haram impel a re-examination of international law and its mechanisms for responding to terrorism. In the wake of the heinous terrorist attacks of 9/11, it was felt in some quarters that international law was inadequate in its response to global terrorism. As globalisation has become more extensive in its permeation of modern society since 9/11, so has modern society become more susceptible to terrorist attacks and to this extent underscore the imperative for the analysis to be undertaken. It is against the backdrop of the foregoing that this paper would seek to critically appraise international law responses to terrorism.

References

  1. Abi-Saab G (2004) The proper role of international law in combating terrorism. In: Bianchi A (ed) Enforcing international law norms against terrorism. Hart, Oxford, pp xiii–xxiiGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya UD (2009) War on terror or terror wars: the problem in defining terrorism. Denver J Int Law Policy 37:653–679Google Scholar
  3. Allain J, Jones JRWD (1997) A patchwork of norms: a commentary on the 1991 draft code of crimes against peace and security of mankind. Eur J Int Law 1:100–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arsanjani M (1999) The 1998 Rome statute of the international criminal court. Am J Int Law 93:22–43Google Scholar
  5. Baxter RR (1974) A skeptical look at the concept of terrorism. Akron Law Rev 7:380–387Google Scholar
  6. Blanchard LP, Blanchard CM (2015) Nigeria’s Boko Haram and the Islamic State. Congressional Research Service Insights March 12, 2015 (IN10242)Google Scholar
  7. Comolli V (2015) Boko Haram: Nigeria’s Islamist insurgency. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Conte A (2010) Human rights in the prevention and punishment of terrorism. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper HHA (1978) Terrorism: the problem of the problem of definition. Chitty’s Law J 26:105–108Google Scholar
  10. Damrosch L et al (eds) (2001) International law: cases and materials. West Group, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  11. Daudet Y (1997) International action against state terrorism. In: Higgins R, Flory M (eds) International law and terrorism. Routledge, London, pp 201–216Google Scholar
  12. Dupuy P (2010) State sponsors of terrorism: issues of international responsibility. In: Bianchi A (ed) Enforcing international law norms against terrorism. Hart, Oxford, pp 3–16Google Scholar
  13. Fassbender B (2010) The UN security council and international terrorism. In: Bianchi A (ed) Enforcing international law norms against terrorism. Hart, Oxford, pp 83–102Google Scholar
  14. Franck TM (2001) Editorial comments: terrorism and the right of self-defence. Am J Int Law 95:839–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Franck TM (2002) Recourse to force: state action against threats and armed attacks. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franck TM, Lockwood BB Jr (1974) Preliminary thoughts towards an international convention on terrorism. Am J Int Law 68:69–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gray C (2013) The International Court of Justice and the use of force. In: Tams CJ, Sloan J (eds) The development of international law by the International Court of Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 237–260Google Scholar
  18. Greenwood C (2002) International law and the war against terrorism. Int Aff 78:301–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greenwood C (2003) International law and the pre-emptive use of force: Afghanistan, Al-Qaida, and Iraq. San Diego Int Law J 4:7–3Google Scholar
  20. Guillaume G (2004) Terrorism and international law. Int Comp Law Q 53:537–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins R (1994) Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Higgins R (1997) The general international law of terrorism. In: Higgins R, Flory M (eds) International law and terrorism. Routledge, London, pp 13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jennings RY (1938) The Caroline and McLeod cases. Am J Int Law 32:82–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolb R (2004) The exercise of criminal jurisdiction over international terrorists. In: Bianchi A (ed) Enforcing international law norms against terrorism. Hart, Oxford, pp 227–281Google Scholar
  25. Kretzmer D (2013) The inherent right to self-defence and proportionality in Jus Ad Bellum. Eur J Int Law 24:235–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lillich RB (1982) Transnational terrorism: conventions and commentary. Michie Corporation, CharlottesvilleGoogle Scholar
  27. Murphy SD (2005) Self-defence and the Israeli wall advisory opinion: an Ipse Dixit from the ICJ. Am J Int Law 99:62–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nawaz MK, Singh G (1977) Legal control of international terrorism. Indian J Int Law 17:66–82Google Scholar
  29. Ortega MC (1997) The ILC adopts the draft code of crimes against the peace and security of mankind. Max Planck Yearb U N Law 1:283–326Google Scholar
  30. Oyebode A (2012) Legal responses to the Boko Haram challenge: an assessment of Nigeria’s terrorism (prevention) act 2011. Forum Publ Policy 1:1–13Google Scholar
  31. Paust J (2002) Use of armed force against terrorists in Afghanistan, Iraq and Beyond. Cornell Int Law J 35:533–558Google Scholar
  32. Plant G (1997) Legal aspects of terrorism at sea. In: Higgins R, Flory M (eds) International law and terrorism. Routledge, London, pp 68–96Google Scholar
  33. Ray N (2016) Growing threat of terrorism in Africa: the case of Boko Haram. Indian Council of World Affairs Issue Brief, 20 February 2016Google Scholar
  34. Richards A (2015) Conceptualizing terrorism. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Romaniuk P (2010) Multilateral counter-terrorism: the global politics of co-operation and contestation. Routledge, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. Rothwell DR (2005) Anticipatory self-defence in the age of international terrorism. Univ Queensland Law J 24:337–353Google Scholar
  37. Saul B (2005) Attempts to define ‘terrorism’ in international law. Neth Int Law Rev 52:57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saul B (2006) Defining terrorism in international law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Scharf MP (2004) Defining terrorism as the peacetime equivalent of war crimes: problems and prospects. Case West Reserve J Int Law 36:359–374Google Scholar
  40. Schmid A (2004) Terrorism: the definitional problem. Case West Reserve J Int Law 36:375–419Google Scholar
  41. Sofaer AD (2003) On the necessity of pre-emption. Eur J Int Law 14:209–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. United Nations Office on Drug and Crime (2009) Handbook on criminal justice responses to terrorism. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Walters F (1969) A history of the league of nations. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  44. Wedgwood R (2005) The ICJ advisory opinion on the Israeli security fence and the limits of self-defence. Am J Int Law 99:52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zlataric B (1975) History of international terrorism and its legal control. In: Bassiouni MC (ed) International terrorism and political crimes. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 474–484Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Osgoode Hall Law SchoolYork UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Baze UniversityAbujaNigeria

Personalised recommendations