Advertisement

Boko Haram’s Radical Ideology and Islamic Jurisprudence

  • Muyiwa Adigun
Chapter

Abstract

Boko Haram is one of the deadliest terrorist organisations in the world with an average of close to eight deaths per terrorist attack. Its killings have been justified by the group in the name of Islam. Because of the magnitude of its killings, people have regarded the group as radical. This study therefore examined the alleged radicalism of Boko Haram in the light of Islamic jurisprudence. The study found that Boko Haram’s ideology is essentially divided into two. The first is its intolerance of Western/secular institution, which manifests in its condemnation of democracy and Western education, while the second one is insurgency. The study argued that Boko Haram’s condemnation of democracy is contrary to the use of Shūrā and ijmā and the Qur’anic injunction making ummah the vicegerent of Allah on earth and that its condemnation of Western education is contrary to the prophetic injunction that knowledge must be sought even in China, which was known as one of the farthest places from the Arabian Peninsula at the time where idolatry could be said to obtain. The study further argued that Boko Haram’s insurgency is contrary to the principles of Islamic jus ad bellum that non-state actors cannot have recourse to the use of force and where Muslim community has recourse to the use of force, it must be in self-defence and the situation must be absolutely necessary and that while Islamic jus in bello recognises the principle of military necessity, distinction, humanity, proportionality and accepting an offer of peace during armed conflict, the insurgent activities of the group violate all these principles. The study therefore concluded that Boko Haram’s ideology is radical to the extent that it deviates from what is usual and traditional in the Qur’an and found in the Sunnah. The study also concluded that Boko Haram insurgency is also radical to the extent that it deviates from what is usual and traditional in Islamic jus ad bellum and Islamic jus in bello, as laid down in the Qur’an and found in the Sunnah.

References

  1. Ali Y (1989) The meaning of the holy Quran. Amana Corporation, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  2. Amnesty International (2015a) Amnesty international report 2014/15: the state of the world’s human rights. Index: POL 10/001/2015. Amnesty InternationalGoogle Scholar
  3. Amnesty International (2015b) Our job is to shoot, slaughter and kill: Boko Haram’s reign of terror in North-East Nigeria. April 2014 Index: AFR 44/1360/2015. Amnesty InternationalGoogle Scholar
  4. Amnesty International (2015c) Boko Haram: civilians continue to be at risk of human rights abuses by Boko Haram and human rights violations by state security forces. Written statement to the 30th session of the UN Human Rights Council. 14 September-2 October 2015 Index: AFR 44/2428/2015. Amnesty InternationalGoogle Scholar
  5. Amnesty International (2015d) Boko Haram: bombing campaign sees civilian deaths spiral. 24 September 2015 Index: 44/2490/2015. Amnesty InternationalGoogle Scholar
  6. Amy P (2014) Boko Haram: an assessment of strengths, vulnerabilities, and policy options. Report to the Strategic Multilayer Assessment Office, Department of Defense, and the Office of University Programs, Department of Homeland Security. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START), College ParkGoogle Scholar
  7. BBC News Africa (30 April 2012) Deadly attack on Nigeria’s Bayero university in Kano. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-17886143. Accessed 2 May 2012
  8. Blanchard LP (2014) Nigeria’s Boko Haram: frequently asked questions. Congressional Research Service Jun 10 2014Google Scholar
  9. Bucaille M (Undated) The Bible, the Qur’an and scienceGoogle Scholar
  10. Darwin C (1909) The origin of species. PF Collier & Son, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Draper W (1874) History of the Conflict between Religion and Science. D Appleton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. El-Awa MS (2000) Punishment in Islamic law: a comparative study. American Trust Publications, PlainfieldGoogle Scholar
  13. Epperson v Arkansas 393 U.S. 97 (1968)Google Scholar
  14. Esposito JL, Voll JO (2001) Islam and democracy. Humanities, November/December 2001 vol 22/No 6Google Scholar
  15. Faridah HJ Hassan Ibn Haldun and Jane Adams: the real father of sociology and the mother of social works. http://www2.uned.es/congreso-ibn-khaldun/pdf/04%20Faridah%20Hj%20Hassan.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2016
  16. Human Rights Watch (2012) World report 2012: Nigeria. http://www.hrw.org/world-report-2012/world-report-2012-nigeria. Accessed 1 May 2012
  17. Institute for Economics and Peace (2014) Global terrorism index 2014: measuring and understanding the impact of terrorism. Institute for Economics and PeaceGoogle Scholar
  18. Malinova M (2013) Is Islam compatible with democracy? Center for Studies, Al JazeeraGoogle Scholar
  19. Maududi SA (1996) Al-jihad fil-islam (Urdu). Lahore, PakistanGoogle Scholar
  20. Mohammed K (2014) The message and methods of Boko Haram. In: Pérouse de Montclos M-A (ed) Boko Haram: islamism, politics, security and the state in Nigeria. West African Politics and Society Series, vol 2. African Studies Centre, Leiden, p 15Google Scholar
  21. Murthadā A (2013) Boko Harām in Nigeria: its beginnings, principles and activities in Nigeria. SalafiManhajGoogle Scholar
  22. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) (May 2014) Background report: Boko Haram recent attacks. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START)Google Scholar
  23. Newman P (2013) The etymology of Hausa boko. Mega-Chad Research NetworkGoogle Scholar
  24. Osman F (Undated) Islam in a modern state: democracy and the concept of shura. Occasional Paper Series Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding History and International Affairs. Edmund A Walsh School of Foreign Service Georgetown University Washington DC 20057Google Scholar
  25. Pérouse de Montclos M-A (2014) Boko Haram and politics: from insurgency to terrorism. In: Pérouse de Montclos M-A (ed) Boko Haram: Islamism, politics, security and the state in Nigeria. West African Politics and Society Series, vol. 2. African Studies Centre, Leiden, p 143Google Scholar
  26. Pérouse de Montclos M-A (2014) Nigeria’s interminable insurgency? addressing the Boko Haram crisis. Africa Programme Sept 2014. Chatham HouseGoogle Scholar
  27. Qutb S (2003) In the shade of the Quran, vol 8 & 9 (trans: M A Salahi). The Islamic Foundation, LeicesterGoogle Scholar
  28. Shah NA (2008) Self-Defence in islamic and international law: assessing al-qaeda and the invasion of Iraq. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shah NA (2011) Islamic law and the law of armed conflict: the armed conflict in Pakistan. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  30. The Constitution of MadinaGoogle Scholar
  31. Yusuf M (2009) Hazihi aqeedatun wa minhaju da’awatuna (This is our belief and method of call)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muyiwa Adigun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Public Law, Faculty of LawUniversity of IbadanIbadanNigeria

Personalised recommendations