Advertisement

Sustainability and Innovation in the Value Chain: An Analysis of a Case Study

  • Ronnie J-Figueiredo
  • Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas
  • Bouchaib Bahli
Chapter
Part of the Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management book series (ITKM)

Abstract

A significant number of companies worldwide recognize the importance of sharing resources for value generation and increased competitiveness in their industries. This change has increased in the relevant energy sector, especially in global companies that operate on a productive scale. The search for new forms of sustainable energy generation is the focus of business operations and is a requirement for the introduction of innovation strategy. The objective of this chapter is to present an innovative practice for creating organizational knowledge and achieving sustainable competitive advantage. We address the theoretical relationship between circular economy, strategic innovation, sustainability, competitiveness, and dynamic capabilities, through a case study of a global and innovative company in the energy sector. The research revealed that ENEL ENERGIA would be unable to keep its development and competitiveness without integrating knowledge generated in the business and its partnership with stakeholders of the shared value chain. This discussion is relevant in the literature on management because it represents, at the current world economic moment, a survival approach for companies through innovation and value sharing.

Keywords

Circular economy Strategic innovation Sustainability Competitiveness Dynamic capabilities 

References

  1. Aldy, J. E. (2017). Frameworks for evaluating policy approaches to address the competitiveness concerns of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. National Tax Journal, 70(2), 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves, A. C., Barbieux, D., Reichert, F. M., Tello-Gamarra, J., & Zawislak, P. A. (2017). Innovation and dynamic capabilities of the firm: Defining an assessment model. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(3), 232–244 https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020170304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrie, J., Zawdie, G., & João, E. (2017). Leveraging triple helix and system intermediaries to enhance effectiveness of protected spaces and strategic niche management for transitioning to circular economy. International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 16(1), 25–47 https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd.16.1.25_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clipa, R. I., & Ifrim, M. (2016). Measuring regional competitiveness. The case of Romania. Annals of the University of Oradea, 103–112.Google Scholar
  5. Cullen, J. G., & Cullen, J. G. (2017). Educating business students about sustainability: A bibliometric review of current trends and research needs. 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2838-3
  6. Díaz-Chao, Á., Sainz-González, J., & Torrent-Sellens, J. (2016). The competitiveness of small network-firm: A practical tool. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1769–1774 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Djuric, S., Stosic-Mihajlovic, L., & Trajkovic, S. (2017). Circular economy and create new values: Recycling, renewable energy, ecology. Journal of Process Management New Technologies, 5(3), 50–68 https://doi.org/10.5937/jouproman5-14306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dobni, C. B., Klassen, M., & Nelson, W. T. (2015). Innovation strategy in the US: Top executives offer their views. Journal of Business Strategy, 36(1), 3–13 https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-12-2013-0115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolinsky, M., & Maier, S. (2015). Market-based approach in shift from linear economy towards circular economy supported by game theory analysis. Creative and Knowledge Society, 5(2), 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1515/cks-2015-0009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ezzi, F., & Jarboui, A. (2016). Does innovation strategy affect financial, social and environmental performance? Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Science, 21(40), 14–24 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jefas.2016.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fallon-Byrne, L., & Harney, B. (2017). Microfoundations of dynamic capabilities for innovation: A review and research agenda. The Irish Journal of Management, 36(1), 21–32 https://doi.org/10.1515/ijm-2017-0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felin, T., & Powell, T. C. (2016). Designing organizations for dynamic capabilities. California Management Review, 58(4), 78–96 https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Figueroa, A., & Koh, S. C. L. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega, 66, 344–357 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hittmar, S., Varmus, M., & Lendel, V. (2015). Proposal of evaluation system for successful application of innovation strategy through a set of indicators. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26(15), 17–22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00796-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsu, Y. (2015). Organizational innovation strategies: The value cocreation strategy (VCS) model. International Journal of Organizational Innovation, 8(2), 6–20 Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=110553634&lang=es&site=eds-live.Google Scholar
  16. Jajja, M. S. S., Kannan, V. R., Brah, S. A., & Hassan, S. Z. (2017). Linkages between firm innovation strategy, suppliers, product innovation, and business performance insights from resource dependence theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(8). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2015-0220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jayaram, J., Oke, A., & Prajogo, D. (2014). The antecedents and consequences of product and process innovation strategy implementation in Australian manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Research, 52(15), 4424–4439 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.849363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kach, A., Azadegan, A., & Wagner, S. M. (2015). The influence of different knowledge workers on innovation strategy and product development performance in small and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Research, 53(8), 2489–2505. https://doi.org/Doi. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.975856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Khan, S., Mohammad, S., & Shah, A. (2017). Study on key empirical factors of competitiveness: Case of textile industry of Pakistan. Journal of Managerial Sciences, 1–23.Google Scholar
  20. Kristensen, D. K., Kjeldsen, C., & ThorsÃe, M. H. (2016). Enabling sustainable agro-food futures: Exploring fault lines and synergies between the integrated territorial paradigm, rural eco-economy and circular economy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(5), 749–765 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9632-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krzakiewicz, K., & Cyfert, S. (2017). Dynamic capabilities in strategic choice processes within organisations. Dynamiczne Zdolności W Procesach Strategicznych Wyborów Organizacji., 21(1), 7–19 https://doi.org/10.1515/manment-2015-0077.Google Scholar
  22. Kuch, B. (2017). The relations between ecological sustainability and geographical proximity. A review of the literature, 16(1), 97–114 https://doi.org/10.1386/tmsd.16.1.97.Google Scholar
  23. Lancaster, P. (2002). Lambda-matrices and vibrating systems. UK: Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
  24. Lemon, B. M. (2017). Sustainability in the public sector. Journal of Government Financial Management, 18–25.Google Scholar
  25. Lendel, V., & Varmus, M. (2011). Creation and implementation of the innovation strategy in the enterprise. Economics and Management, 16, 819–826 Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/61822073/creation-implementation-innovation-strategy-enterprise.Google Scholar
  26. Lion, A., Macchion, L., Danese, P., & Vinelli, A. (2016). Sustainability approaches within the fashion industry: The supplier perspective., 17(2), 95–108.Google Scholar
  27. Luchs, M. G., & Kumar, M. (2017). “‘Yes, but this other one looks better/works better’”: How do consumers respond to trade-offs between sustainability and other valued attributes? 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2695-0
  28. Mativenga, P. T., Sultan, A. A. M., Agwa-Ejon, J., & Mbohwa, C. (2017). Composites in a circular economy: A study of United Kingdom and South Africa. Procedia CIRP, 61, 691–696 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ndubisi, N. O., Capel, C. M., & Ndubisi, G. C. (2015). Innovation strategy and performance of international technology services ventures: The moderating effect of structural autonomy. Journal of Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-09-2016-0047.
  30. Niero, M., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2017). Closing the loop for packaging: Finding a framework to operationalize circular economy strategies. Procedia CIRP, 61, 685–690 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ochel, W. (2002). The international competitiveness of business service firms: The case of Germany. Service Industries Journal, 22(2), 1–16 https://doi.org/10.1080/714005075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Özyurt, P. M., & Kantarci, K. (2017). The intervening role of competitiveness on the relationship between sustainability and tourism performance: A research on European countries. Economic Themes, 55(1), 89–103 https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2017-0006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Paulraj, A., Chen, I. J., & Blome, C. (2017). Motives and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: A multi-theoretical perspective. 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2857-0
  34. Pavlovych, D. M., & Sergiivna, D. K. (2016). Activities to enhance innovation: Innovation strategy woodworking companyEconomic Processes Management: International Scientific E-Journal, 4. Retrieved from http://epm.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/download/2016_4/epm2016_4_14.pdf
  35. Peña-Vinces, J. C., Casanova, L., Guillen, J., & Urbano, D. (2017). International competitiveness of small and medium-sized enterprises: Peru, a Latin-American emerging market. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 53(1), 150–169 https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2016.1156525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rentschler, J., & Kornejew, M. (2017). Energy price variation and competitiveness: Firm level evidence from Indonesia. Energy Economics, 67, 242–254 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schilke, O. (2014). Second-order dynamic capabilities: How do they matter? Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(4), 368–380 https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schuler, D., Rasche, A., Newton, L., & Etzion, D. (2017). Corporate sustainability management and environmental ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2(April 2017), 213–237 https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stojanovska, S., Kar, R., & Bhasin, N. (2017). The institutional determinant of competitiveness. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(17).Google Scholar
  40. Takahashi, A., Bulgacov, S., Semprebon, E., & Giacomini, M. (2017). Dynamic capabilities, marketing capability and organizational performance. Brazilian Business Review, 14(5), 466–478 https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2017.14.5.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35 https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Terziu, H. (2014). Creating clusters and competitiveness. Iliria International Review, 1.Google Scholar
  43. Vasiljevic-Shikaleska, A., Gjozinska, B., & Stojanovikj, M. (2017). The circular economy – a pathway to sustainable future. Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(17), 13–30 Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=123844268&site=ehost-live.Google Scholar
  44. Wysokińska, Z. (2016). The “new” environmental policy of the European Union: A path to development of a circular economy and mitigation of the negative effects of climate change. Comparative Economic Research, 19(2), 57–73 https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2016-0013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zaharia, A., Popescu, G., & Vreja, L. O. (2016). Energy scientific production in the context of the green development models. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(4), 151–169.Google Scholar
  46. Zinovyeva, I. S., Kozenko, Y. А., Gerasimov, K. B., Dubova, Y. I., & Irizepova, M. S. (2016). Regional innovation development as a feature of competitiveness in the XXI century. Contemporary Economics, 10(4), 333–342 https://doi.org/10.5709/ce.1897-9254.220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zokaeï, K., & Manikas, I. (2014). Understanding environmental sustainability of supply chains: The biofuels industry in the United Kingdom. Supply Chain Forum, 15, 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronnie J-Figueiredo
    • 1
  • Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas
    • 1
  • Bouchaib Bahli
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Engineering (Latec), Faculty of EngineeringFederal Fluminense UniversityNiteróiBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Information Technology and Management, Faculty of Information TechnologyRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations