Advertisement

Circles of Support and Accountability, Assisted Desistance and Community Transition

  • Nicholas Blagden
  • Helen Elliott
  • Rebecca Lievesley
Chapter
Part of the Sexual Crime book series (SEXCR)

Abstract

This chapter will focus on what we know about sexual offending and desistence from sexual crime. It will contain a summary of sexual offending from a psychologist’s point of view. Both historical psychological studies and more recent developments of thinking in this area will be explored, including seminal theories of sexual offending and desistance. These are explored in relation to Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA), and how CoSA can assist in desistance from crime where prison rehabilitation falls short. Recent research findings will be incorporated and implications for treatment and promoting desistance from crime will be explored.

Keywords

Desistance Theories of sexual offending Prison rehabilitation Therapeutic relationship 

References

  1. Arrigo, B. A., & Takahashi, Y. (2006). Recommunalization of the disenfranchised: A theoretical and critical criminological inquiry. Theoretical Criminology, 10(3), 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, A., Macrae, R., Williams, D., & Webb, C. (2012). Ever-increasing circles: A descriptive study of Hampshire and Thames Valley circles of support and accountability 2002–09. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(3), 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blagden, N., & Perrin, C. (2016). ‘Relax lads, you’re in safe hands here’: Experiences of a sexual offender treatment prison. In C. Reeves (Ed.), Experiencing prison (pp. 27–45). Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Blagden, N., Perrin, C., Smith, S., Gleeson, F., & Gillies, L. (2017). “A different world” exploring and understanding the climate of a recently re-rolled sexual offender prison. Journal of Sexual Aggression. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2016.1264633
  5. Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Hames, C. (2014). “They treat us like human beings”—Experiencing a therapeutic sex offenders prison impact on prisoners and staff and implications for treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60, 371–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14553227 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blagden, N. J., Winder, B., Thorne, K., & Gregson, M. (2011). ‘No-one in the world would ever wanna speak to me again’: An interpretative phenomenological analysis into convicted sexual offenders accounts and experiences of maintaining and leaving denial. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17(7), 563–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Braden, M., Göbbels, S., Willis, G. M., Ward, T., Costeletos, M., & Mollica, J. (2012). Creating social capital and reducing harm: Corrections Victoria support and awareness groups. Sexual Abuse in Australia and New Zealand, 4(2), 36.Google Scholar
  8. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, S. (1999). Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4(2), 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnett, R., & McNeill, F. (2005). The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime. Probation Journal, 52(3), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cesaroni, C. (2001). Releasing sex offenders into the community through “circles of support”—A means of reintegrating the “worst of the worst”. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34(2), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chiricos, T., Barrick, K., & Bales, W. (2007). The labelling of convicted felons and its consequences for recidivism. Criminology, 45(3), 547–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craig, L. A. (2005). The impact of training on attitudes towards sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11(2), 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Vries Robbé, M., Mann, R. E., Maruna, S., & Thornton, D. (2015). An exploration of protective factors supporting desistance from sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott, I. A., & Zajac, G. (2015). The implementation of circles of support and accountability in the United States. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farmer, M., Beech, A. R., & Ward, T. (2012). Assessing desistance in child molesters: A qualitative analysis. Journal of interpersonal Violence, 27(5), 930–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farmer, M., McAlinden, A. M., & Maruna, S. (2016). Sex offending and situational motivation: Findings from a qualitative analysis of desistance from sexual offending. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(15), 1756–1775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox, K. J. (2015). Theorizing community integration as desistance-promotion. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(1), 82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Friestad, C. (2012). Making sense, making good, or making meaning? Cognitive distortions as targets of change in offender treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56(3), 465–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control (Vol. 367). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Göbbels, S., Ward, T., & Willis, G. M. (2012). An integrative theory of desistance from sex offending. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 17(5), 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hannem, S. (2011). Experiences in reconciling risk management and restorative justice: How circles of support and accountability work restoratively in the risk society. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(3), 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Höing, M., Bogaerts, S., & Vogelvang, B. (2013). Circles of support and accountability: How and why they work for sex offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 13(4), 267–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Höing, M., Vogelvang, B., & Bogaerts, S. (2015). “I am a different man now”—Sex offenders in circles of support and accountability: A prospective study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(7), 751–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36(2), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Horvath, A. O., & Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(4), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.61.4.561 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Irwin, J., & Owen, B. (2005). Harm and the contemporary prison. In A. Liebling & S. Maruna (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 94–117). London: Willan.Google Scholar
  28. Kewley, S. (2017). Strength based approaches and protective factors from a criminological perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kitson-Boyce, R., Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Dillon, G. (2016). The CoSA prison-model: Supporting the transition from prison to community. In 16th Annual Conference of the European Society of Criminology 2016, University of Münster, Münster, Germany, 21–24 September.Google Scholar
  30. Kjelsberg, E., & Loos, L. H. (2008). Conciliation or condemnation? Prison employees’ and young peoples’ attitudes towards sexual offender. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7(1), 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LeBel, T. P., Burnett, R., Maruna, S., & Bushway, S. (2008). The chicken and egg’of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 131–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levenson, J. S., & Cotter, L. P. (2005). The effect of Megan’s Law on sex offender reintegration. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 21(1), 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maruna, S. (2004). Desistance from crime and explanatory style: A new direction in the psychology of reform. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20(2), 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maruna, S., & LeBel, T. P. (2002). Welcome home? Examining the “reentry court” concept from a strengths-based perspective. Western Criminology Review, 4, 91.Google Scholar
  36. Maruna, S., LeBel, T., Naples, M., & Mitchell, N. (2009). Looking-glass identity transformation: Pygmalion and Golem in the rehabilitation process. In How offenders transform their lives (pp. 30–55). Cullompton, UK: Willan.Google Scholar
  37. McAdams, D. P. (2006a). The redemptive self: Generativity and the stories Americans live by. Research in Human Development, 3(2–3), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McAdams, D. P. (2006b). The role of narrative in personality psychology today. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McAlinden, A. M. (2007). The shaming of individuals with sexual crime convictions: Risk, retribution and reintegration. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. McCulloch, T. (2005). Probation, social context and desistance: Retracing the relationship. Probation Journal, 52(1), 8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McNeill, F. (2014, May). Desistance, rehabilitation and reintegration. In J. Shapland (Chair), How best to stop offenders re-offending and reintegrate them into civil society. Symposium conducted at the seminar series of the University of Sheffield Centre for Criminological Research, London, UK.Google Scholar
  42. Mead, S., Hilton, D., & Curtis, L. (2001). Peer support: A theoretical perspective. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 25(2), 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paternoster, R., & Bushway, S. (2009). Desistance and the “feared self”: Toward an identity theory of criminal desistance. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 99, 1103–1156.Google Scholar
  44. Perrin, C., & Blagden, N. (2014). Accumulating meaning, purpose and opportunities to change ‘drip by drip’: The impact of being a listener in prison. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(9), 902–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Petrunik, M. (2003). The hare and the tortoise: Dangerousness and sex offender policy in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 45, 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Purvis, M. (2010). Seeking a good life: Human goods and sexual offending. Germany: Lambert Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  48. Silverman, J., & Wilson, D. (2002). Innocence betrayed: Paedophilia, the media and society. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  49. Stone, R. (2015). Desistance and identity repair: Redemption narratives as resistance to stigma. British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/BJC/AZV081
  50. Tate, H., Blagden, N., & Mann, R. (in press). Evaluation the five minute intervention. London: MoJ.Google Scholar
  51. Ullrich, S., & Coid, J. (2011). Protective factors for violence among released prisoners—Effects over time and interactions with static risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical psychology, 79(3), 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vaughan, B. (2007). The internal narrative of desistance. British Journal of Criminology, 47(3), 390–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ward, T. (2002a). Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: Promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(5), 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ward, T. (2002b). The management of risk and the design of good lives. Australian Psychologist, 37, 172–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 10, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ward, T., & Marshall, B. (2007). Narrative identity and offender rehabilitation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 51(3), 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ward, T., & Stewart, C. A. (2003). The treatment of sex offenders: Risk management and good lives. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 34, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weaver, B. (2015). Offending and desistance: The importance of social relations (Vol. 8). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Weaver, B., & McNeill, F. (2015). Lifelines: Desistance, social relations, and reciprocity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(1), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson, R. J., Cortoni, F., & McWhinnie, A. J. (2009). Circles of support & accountability: A Canadian national replication of outcome findings. Sexual Abuse, 21(4), 412–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson, R. J., & Yates, P. M. (2009). Effective interventions and the Good Lives Model: Maximizing treatment gains for individuals with sexual crime convictions. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Youssef, C., Casey, S., & Birgden, A. (2017). Potential underpinnings for community maintenance programs for individuals with sexual crime convictions. Aggression and Violent Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.05.002

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Blagden
    • 1
  • Helen Elliott
    • 2
  • Rebecca Lievesley
    • 1
  1. 1.Nottingham Trent UniversityNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Bishop Grosseteste UniversityLincolnUK

Personalised recommendations