Advertisement

A History of the Development of Circles of Support and Accountability

  • Chris Wilson
Chapter
Part of the Sexual Crime book series (SEXCR)

Abstract

Wilson summarises the historical development of Circles of Support and Accountability (CoSA), from its early beginnings in Canada, to the successful implementation in both the United Kingdom and Europe. The chapter explores how the original model was adapted to a British context to ensure it became a meaningful component of the risk management process, and highlights how this restorative community based initiative works effectively within the existing criminal justice system. Wilson examples how the development of a strength based approach in rehabilitation facilitated CoSA’s ability to enhance and support the work of statutory agencies in a truly ‘transformative’ manner for both the Core Member, who is the recipient of CoSA, and the community to which they return.

Keywords

CoSA Restorative Rehabilitation Core Member Volunteer Community 

References

  1. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1998). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, S., Chistyakova, Y., Mackenzie, S., & Malloch, M. (2008). Circles of support and accountability: Consideration of the feasibility of pilots in Scotland. Report No. 1/2008, The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, S., & Wills, D. (2014). Circles of support and accountability (COSA) in Scotland: Practice, progress and questions. Scottish Journal of Criminal Justice Studies, 20, 2–13.Google Scholar
  4. Bates, A., Williams, D., Wilson, C., & Wilson, R. (2013). Circles South East: The first 10 years 2002–2012. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 861–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazemore, G., & Stinchcomb, J. (2004). A civic engagement model of re-entry: Involving community through service and restoration. Federal Probation, 68, 1–14.Google Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carich, M., Wilson, C., Carich, P., & Calder, M. (2010). Contemporary sex offender treatment: Incorporating circles of support and the good lives model. In J. Brayford, F. Cowe, & J. Deering (Eds.), What else works? Creative work with offenders (pp. 188–210). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Christie, N. (1977, January). Conflicts as property. The British Journal of Criminology, 17, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Circles UK. (2008). Code of Practice Version 1 (available from Circles UK Abbey House Reading RG1 3BE).Google Scholar
  10. Daly, K. (2003). Restorative justice: The real story. In G. Johnstone (Ed.), A restorative justice reader. Texts, sources, context (p. 363). Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Fox, K. J. (2014). Behavior theorizing community integration as desistance-promotion. Criminal Justice and Behavior. Published online 25 September 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814550028. The online version of this article can be found at: http://cjb.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/09/25/0093854814550028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansard HC Debates. (7 July 2004). vol. 423 cc296305WH.Google Scholar
  13. Hanvey, S., Philpot, T., & Wilson, C. (2011). A community based approach to the reduction of sexual reoffending circles of support and accountability. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Haslewood-Pocsik, I., Smith, E., & Spencer, J. (2008, January). IMPACT circles: Balancing risk management with support: A study of an innovative approach in working with sex offenders. Final report. University of Manchester, Manchester.Google Scholar
  15. Mann, R., & Shingler, J. (2006). Collaboration in clinical work with sex offenders: Treatment and risk assessment. In W. L. Marshall, Y. E. Fernandez, L. E. Marshall, & G. A. Serran (Eds.), Sexual offender treatment: Controversial issues. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  16. McAlinden. (2007). The shaming of individual convicted of a sexual offences risk, retribution and reintegration. Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. McNeill, F. (2006). A desistance paradigm for offender management. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 6, 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Newell, T. (2007). Forgiving justice: A Quaker vision for criminal justice Swarthmore Lecture 2000. London: Quaker Books.Google Scholar
  19. Pranis, K. (2007). Restorative values. In G. Johnstone & D. Van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (p. 68). Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Saunders, R., & Wilson, C. (2003, July). Circles of support and accountability in the Thames Valley: Questions and answers. NOTA News 45.Google Scholar
  21. Thomas, T., Thompson, D., & Karstedt, S. (2014). Assessing the impact of circles of support and accountability on the reintegration of adults convicted of sexual offences in the community. Final report. Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, School of Law, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  22. Ward, T., Fox, K. J., & Garber, M. (2014). Restorative justice, offender rehabilitation and desistance. Restorative Justice, 2(1), 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Ward, T., & Stewart, C. (2003). Criminogenic needs and human needs: A theoretical model. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wilson, R. J., Cortoni, F., & McWhinnie, A. W. (2009). Circles of support & accountability: A Canadian national replication of outcome findings. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21, 412–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wilson, R. J., McWhinnie, A., & Wilson, C. (2008). Circles of support and accountability: An international partnership in reducing individual convicted of a sexual offence recidivism. Prison Service Journal, 178, 26–36.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, R. J., Picheca, J. E., & Pinzo, M. (2005). Circles of support and accountability: An evaluation of the pilot project in South Central Ontario. Research Report R. 168. Ottawa, ON: Correctional Service of Canada.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations