Product Traceability in Ceramic Industry 4.0: A Design Approach and Cloud-Based MES Prototype

  • João Barata
  • Paulo Rupino da Cunha
  • Anand Subhashchandra Gonnagar
  • Mateus Mendes
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 26)

Abstract

We propose a customer-focused approach to design product traceability for Industry 4.0. Our design-science research includes a review of traceability technologies and participative enterprise modeling in the ceramic industry. We find benefits in combining Business Process Modeling Notation and Goal-oriented Requirements Language representations to (1) promote reflection by experts with different backgrounds, (2) reach consensus with a solution that addresses the goals of multiple stakeholders, and (3) ensure that customers’ needs are a priority in traceability design. The resulting model combines technologies in different stages of the product lifecycle and is implemented in a cloud-based MES (Manufacturing Execution System) prototype. Depending on each stage and strategic intention, the identification code can be embedded in the product, transport, or package. Our contribution can assist managers in the creation of cloud-based MES to support traceability integration at (1) technological, (2) vertical, and (3) horizontal levels that are required in the fourth industrial revolution.

Keywords

Traceability Ceramic industry BPM GRL Manufacturing execution system Industry 4.0 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by Portugal 2020 and European Union, European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), POCI-01-0247-FEDER-024541.

References

  1. 1.
    Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H.G., Feld, T., Hoffmann, M.: Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 6, 239–242 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Valckenaers, P., Van Brussel, H.: Holonic manufacturing execution systems. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 54, 427–432 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Banker, R.D., Bardhan, I.R., Chang, H., Lin, S.: Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities, and plant performance. MIS Q. 30, 315–337 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Helo, P., Suorsa, M., Hao, Y., Anussornnitisarn, P.: Toward a cloud-based manufacturing execution system for distributed manufacturing. Comput. Ind. 65, 646–656 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO: ISO 8402:1994 Quality management and quality assurance—vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Terzi, S., Panetto, H., Morel, G., Garetti, M.: A holonic metamodel for product traceability in Product Lifecycle Management. Int. J. Prod. Lifecycle Manag. 2, 253 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ISO: ISO 9001:2015 Quality management system—Requirements. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang, J., Feng, P., Wu, Z., Yu, D.: Automatic identification-enabled traceability in supply chain management. In: WiCOM’08. 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing. IEEE, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Liu, F., Fu, Z., Mu, W.: Strengths and limitations on the operating mechanisms of traceability system in agro food, China. Food Control 21, 825–829 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Participative enterprise modeling: experiences and recommendations. In: Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 546–560. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pankowska, M.: User participation in information system development. In: International Conference on Information Society (i-Society), pp. 396–401 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simon, H.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75–105 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, A.S., Thomas, M., Baskerville, R.L.: Going back to basics in design science: from the information technology artifact to the information systems artifact. Inf. Syst. J. 25, 5–21 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–78 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    APICER: Ceramic Tableware, http://www.ceramica.pt/en/setor.php?s=decorativa [2018-02-23]
  17. 17.
    Alfaro, J.A., Rábade, L.A.: Traceability as a strategic tool to improve inventory management: a case study in the food industry. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 118, 104–110 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ngai, E.: Building traceability systems: a design science approach. In: Proceedings of the 16th Americas Conference on Information Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dai, H., Tseng, M.M., Zipkin, P.H.: Design of traceability systems for product recall. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53, 511–531 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jansen-Vullers, M.H., Van Dorp, C.A., Beulens, A.J.M.: Managing traceability information in manufacture. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 23, 395–413 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dai, H., Ge, L., Zhou, W.: A design method for supply chain traceability systems with aligned interests. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 170, 14–24 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lehmann, R.J., Reiche, R., Schiefer, G.: Future internet and the agri-food sector: State-of-the-art in literature and research. Comput. Electron. Agric. 89, 158–174 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tzoulis, I., Andreopoulou, Z.: Emerging traceability technologies as a tool for quality wood trade. Procedia Technol. 8, 606–611 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soon, T.J.: QR Code. Synthesis J., 59–78 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ventura, C.E.H., Aroca, R.V., Antonialli, A.Í.S., Abrão, A.M., Rubio, J.C.C., Câmara, M.A.: Towards part lifetime traceability using machined quick response codes. Procedia Technol. 26, 89–96 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prater, E., Frazier, G.V., Reyes, P.M.: Future impacts of RFID on e-supply chains in grocery retailing. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 10, 134–142 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Smit, J., Kreutzer, S., Moeller, C., Carlberg, M.: Industry 4.0—Study for the ITRE Committee. (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barata, J., Cunha, P.R.: Mobile supply chain management: moving where? In: Proceedings of the 13th European, Mediterranean and Middle Eastern Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS), pp. 1–13. Krakow, Poland (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hermann, M., Pentek, T., Otto, B.: Design principles for Industrie 4.0 scenarios. In: Proceedings of the 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 3928–3937. Grand Hyatt, Kauai (2016)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N.: How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an Industry 4.0 perspective. Int. J. Mech. Aerosp. Ind. Mechatron. Manuf. Eng. 8, 37–44 (2014)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prifti, L., Knigge, M., Kienegger, H., Krcmar, H.: A competency model for “Industrie 4.0” employees. In: 13th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, pp. 46–60. St. Gallen, Switzerland (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cubero, S., Lee, W.S., Aleixos, N., Albert, F., Blasco, J.: Automated systems based on machine vision for inspecting citrus fruits from the field to postharvest—a review. Food Bioprocess Technol. 9, 1623–1639 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Moriyama, S., Tanabe, H.: Traceability and identification solutions for secure and comfortable society. Hitachi Rev., 50–54 (2004)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    UNESCAP: Information management in Agrifood Chains: towards an integrated paperless framework for agrifood trade facilitation. United Nations (2015)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mira, J.J., Guilabert, M., Carrillo, I., Fernández, C., Vicente, M.A., Orozco-Beltrán, D., Gil-Guillen, V.F.: Use of QR and EAN-13 codes by older patients taking multiple medications for a safer use of medication. Int. J. Med. Inform. 84, 406–412 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zarei, S.: RFID in mobile supply chain management usage. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 1, 11–20 (2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    von Sivers, R., Sjögren, A.: Traceability in a sanitary ware production system–a case study at Ifö Sanitär (2013)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Quinteiro, P., Almeida, M., Dias, A.C., Araújo, A., Arroja, L.: The carbon footprint of ceramic products. In: Assessment of Carbon Footprint in Different Industrial Sectors, pp. 113–150. Springer Singapore (2014)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Amyot, D., Rashidi-Tabrizi, R., Mussbacher, G.: Improved GRL modeling and analysis with jUCMNav 5. In: Proceedings of the 6th International i* Workshop (iStar 2013), CEUR, vol. 978. pp. 137–139 (2013)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Barata, J., Cunha, P.R.: Mending the patchwork of requirements from multiple standards using participative goal modelling: a case in the food industry. Requir. Eng. (in press), pp. 1–17 (2017)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    McFarlan, F.W.: Information technology changes the way you compete. Harv. Bus. Rev., May–June, 98–103 (1984)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Barata, J., Cunha, P.R., Stal, J.: Mobile supply chain management in the industry 4.0 era: an annotated bibliography and guide for future research. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 31, 173–192 (2018)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Andersen, P., Ross, J.W.: Transforming the LEGO Group for the Digital Economy. In: ICIS 2016 Proceedings. Dublin, Ireland (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • João Barata
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Paulo Rupino da Cunha
    • 2
  • Anand Subhashchandra Gonnagar
    • 3
  • Mateus Mendes
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.CTCV - Technological Center for Ceramics and GlassCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.CISUCUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  3. 3.ESTGOHPolytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Oliveira do HospitalCoimbraPortugal
  4. 4.Institute of Systems and Robotics of the University of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations