Advertisement

The Limits of Violence

  • Toivo Koivukoski
Chapter

Abstract

What constitutes violence, and what value may consist in aggression? There is a school of thought in political theory that puts forward the argument that violence can have a transformative social effect, serving an almost transcendent function as the hinge upon which history turns. The author contemplates several approaches to understanding the nature of violence. However dangerous these approaches to violence may be, they speak to a truth about the human condition that cannot be ignored, namely that violence may attract inasmuch as it disrupts, and that the ultimate imposition onto human freedom may be the possibility that negating the given is too uncomfortable to countenance. In this sense, an overweening emphasis on peace in social relations may be the mask of a tyranny that cannot be resisted.

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (D. Heller-Roazen, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1951). Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arendt, H. (1963). Between Past and Future: Six Exercises in Political Thought. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  5. Arendt, H. (1963/2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Arendt, H. (1969). On Violence. Orlando: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  7. Aristotle. (1984). Politics (C. Lord, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Benjamin, W. (1968). Theses on the philosophy of history (H. Zohn, Trans.). In H. Arendt (Ed.), Illuminations. New York: Shocken Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bethune, N. (1972). The Wounds. Guelph: Alive Press.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1987). Subjects of Desire: Hegelian Reflections in Twentieth-Century France. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Butler, J. (2010). Frames of War: When is Life Grievable? London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Grant, G. (1991). Technology and Empire: Perspectives on North America. Toronto: Anansi.Google Scholar
  13. Hegel, G. W. F. (1953). Reason in History (R. S. Hartman, Trans.). New York: Library of Liberal Arts.Google Scholar
  14. Hegel, G. W. F. (1967). The Phenomenology of Mind (J. B. Baillie, Trans.). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  15. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  16. Homer. (1999). Iliad (Murray, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Homer. (2000). Odyssey (S. Lombardo, Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  18. Huang, Y. (2010). The ethics of difference in the Zhuangzi. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 78(1), 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (2010). Power and Interdependence (4th ed.). Toronto: Pearson. Originally published in 1977.Google Scholar
  20. Koivukoski, T. (2014). The New Barbarism: Recognizing an Ethic of Difference. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  21. Koivukoski, T., & Tabachnick, D., co-editors. (2009). Enduring Empire: Ancient Lessons for Global Politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kojève, A. (1969). Introduction to the Reading of Hegel (J. H. Nichols, Trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A Knopf.Google Scholar
  24. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Newell, W. R. (2009). Redeeming modernity: The ascent of eros and wisdom in Hegel’s phenomenology. Interpretation, 37(1), 3–28.Google Scholar
  26. Nietzsche, F. (1995). Thus Spoke Zarathustra (Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
  27. Rosen, S. (1999). “Kojève”, A Companion to Continental Philosophy. London: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Roth, M. S. (1988). Knowing and History: Appropriations of Hegel in Twentieth-Century France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Thucydides. (2009). The Peloponnesian War (M. Hammond, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Weber, M. (1961). Politics as vocation. In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Zizek, S. (2008). Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toivo Koivukoski
    • 1
  1. 1.Nipissing University Peace Research InitiativeNipissing UniversityNorth BayCanada

Personalised recommendations