Social Infrastructure: Designing for Online Civility

  • Ramona Pringle


Online toxicity is rampant across all corners of the Internet, ranging from media organizations and news outlets to gaming platforms and social media networks. Colloquial wisdom such as “don’t feed the trolls” and “don’t read the comments” has become a de facto solution for dealing with this kind of incivility. Shared digital spaces have become hijacked by the toxic minority, whose vitriolic presence often overwhelms any attempt at dialogue or debate. By design, online platforms seem to foster this kind of incivility, and it can seem as though the Internet brings out the worst in human nature. This chapter examines what strategies can be employed to mitigate the rising toxicity online through the development and integration of social infrastructure, citing examples from a diverse array of online communities and platforms.


  1. Birk, M. V., Buttlar, B., Bowey, J. T., Poeller, S., Thomson, S. C., Baumann, N., & Mandryk, R. L. (2016, May). The effects of social exclusion on play experience and hostile cognitions in digital games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3007–3019). San Jose, CA, USA: ACM.Google Scholar
  2. Blackburn, J., & Kwak, H. (2014). STFU NOOB! Predicting crowdsourced decisions on toxic behavior in online games. CoRR, abs/1404.5. Retrieved from
  3. Cho, D., Kim, S., & Acquisti, A. (2012, January). Empirical analysis of online anonymity and user behaviors: The impact of real name policy. In System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference (pp. 3041–3050). Maui, HI, USA: IEEE.Google Scholar
  4. Curry, A. L., & Hammonds, K. H. (2014). The power of solutions journalism. Solutions Journalism Network. Google Scholar
  5. Golding, W. (1954). Lord of the Flies. New York: Perigee.Google Scholar
  6. Greenstein, S., & Zhu, F. (2014). Do Experts Or Collective Intelligence Write with More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Business School. Google Scholar
  7. Hoggan, J., & Litwin, G. (2016). I’m Right and You’re an Idiot: The Toxic State of Public Discourse and How to Clean It Up. Vancouver, BC: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Johnson, D. G. (1997). Ethics online. Communications of the ACM, 40(1), 60–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Kim, J. Y., Allen, J. P., & Lee, E. (2008). Alternate reality gaming. Communications of the ACM, 51(2), 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ksiazek, T. B. (2015). Civil interactivity: How news organizations’ commenting policies explain civility and hostility in user comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(4), 556–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Konnikova, M. (2013). The Psychology of Online Comments. Retrieved from
  13. Labarre, S. (2013). Why We’re Shutting Off Our Comments. Retrieved from
  14. Lin, J. (2015). Doing Something About the ‘Impossible Problem’ of Abuse in Online Games. Retrieved from
  15. McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Norman, D. (2013). The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Olsen, C. B., & Gaude, C. (2015). Show Me What You Share and I’ll Tell You Who You Are. Retrieved from:
  18. Pringle, R. (2017). Online Hate Might Just Be an Issue of Bad Design. Retrieved from
  19. Schneiderman, E. (2014). Taming the Digital Wild West. Retrieved from
  20. Shirky, C. (2008). Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  21. Shirky, C. (2010). Cognitive Surplus: How Technology Makes Consumers into Collaborators. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  22. Stroud, N. J. (2014). Journalist Involvement in Comment Sections. Report prepared for the Engaging News Project. [online]
  23. Strangelove, M. (2015). Post-TV: Piracy, Cord-Cutting, and the Future of Television. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sue, D. W., Capodilupo, C. M., Torino, G. C., Bucceri, J. M., Holder, A., Nadal, K. L., & Esquilin, M. (2007). Racial microaggressions in everyday life: Implications for clinical practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramona Pringle
    • 1
  1. 1.RTA School of MediaRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations