Advertisement

Organization of Psychosomatic Service in Health Systems: The German Perspective

  • Stephan Zipfel
  • Anne Herrmann-Werner
  • Florian Junne
Chapter
Part of the Integrating Psychiatry and Primary Care book series (IPPC)

Abstract

Psychosomatic Medicine in Germany is either practiced as an integrated approach in mainly internal medicine or specifically focusses on psychotherapeutic methods. There are stepped levels of training for doctors ranging from basic care as a GP to specialist degrees. Patients are treated in inpatient and day-patient facilities with usually interprofessional multi-modal therapy programs. Additionally there are rehabilitation centers particularly focusing on work-related aspects of disability prevention. Usually, hospitals also host a strong psychosomatic outpatient sector and consultation-liaison service including specific care e.g. in psycho-oncology or transplant psychosomatics.

References

  1. 1.
    Fava GA, Belaise C, Sonino N. Psychosomatic medicine is a comprehensive field, not a synonym for consultation liaison psychiatry. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2010;12:215–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deter HC. Psychosomatic medicine and psychotherapy: on the historical development of a special field in Germany. Adv Psychosom Med. 2004;26:181–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    von Uexküll Thure WW. Integrierte Medizin als Gesamtkonzept der Heilkunde: Ein bio-psycho-soziales Modell. In: Adler RWH, Joraschky P, Köhle K, Langewitz W, Söllner W, Wesiak W, editors. Psychosomatische Medizin: Theoretische Modelle und klinische Praxis, vol. 7. München: Elsevier GmbH; 2011. p. 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. 2014. http://www.kbv.de/html/. Accessed 6 Oct 2017.
  5. 5.
    Bundesärztekammer. 2014. http://www.bundesaerztekammer.de/weitere-sprachen/english/german-medical-association/. Accessed 6 Oct 2017.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zipfel S, Giel KE, Bulik CM, Hay P, Schmidt U. Anorexia nervosa: aetiology, assessment, and treatment. Lancet Psychiatry. 2015;2:1099–111.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zipfel S, Herzog W, Kruse J, Henningsen P. Psychosomatic medicine in Germany: more timely than ever. Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85:262–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linden M. Psychosomatic inpatient rehabilitation: the German model. Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83:205–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Probst T, von Heymann F, Zaudig M, Konermann J, Lahmann C, Loew T, et al. The effectiveness of psychosomatic inpatient treatment—results of a multicentre follow-up study. Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2009;55:409–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liebherz S, Rabung S. Do patients’ symptoms and interpersonal problems improve in psychotherapeutic hospital treatment in Germany? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e105329.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dinger U, Klipsch O, Kohling J, Ehrenthal JC, Nikendei C, Herzog W, et al. Day-clinic and inpatient psychotherapy for depression (dip-d): a randomized controlled pilot study in routine clinical care. Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83:194–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zeeck A, von Wietersheim J, Weiss H, Eduard Scheidt C, Volker A, Helesic A, et al. Symptom course in inpatient and day clinic treatment of depression: results from the INDDEP-study. J Affect Disord. 2015;187:35–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bundespsychotherapeutenkammer. 2016. http://www.bptk.de/. Accessed 6 Oct 2017.
  14. 14.
    Herzog W, Beutel M, Kruse J. Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie heute—zur Lage des Fachgebietes in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2012.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Billings EG. Liaison psychiatry and intern instruction. J Assoc Am Med Coll. 1939;14:375–85.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diefenbacher AC. Psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine in Germany: lessons to be learned. Austr N Zeal J Psychiatry. 2005;39:782–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Laner B, Staufer C, Giesinger JM, Gross R, Kohl C, Malik P, et al. Psychiatric consultation-liaison interventions: recollection, perception and outcome. J Psychosom Res. 2013;75:184–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.06.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wood R, Wand AP. The effectiveness of consultation-liaison psychiatry in the general hospital setting: a systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2014;76:175–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.01.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leentjens AF, Rundell JR, Wolcott DL, Diefenbacher A, Kathol R, Guthrie E. Psychosomatic medicine and consultation-liaison psychiatry: scope of practice, processes, and competencies for psychiatrists or psychosomatic medicine specialists. A consensus statement of the European Association of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Psychosomatics. 2011;52:19–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Frank JR, Danoff D. The CanMEDS initiative: implementing an outcomes-based framework of physician competencies. Med Teach. 2007;29:642–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Söllner W, Creed F, European Association of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatics Workgroup on Training in Consultation-Liaison. European guidelines for training in consultation-liaison psychiatry and psychosomatics: report of the EACLPP workgroup on training in consultation-liaison psychiatry and psychosomatics. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:501–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Dowd MA, Gomez MF. Psychotherapy in consultation-liaison psychiatry. Am J Psychother. 2001;55:122–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Olbrisch ME, Benedict SM, Ashe K, Levenson JL. Psychological assessment and care of organ transplant patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:771–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jowsey SG, Schneekloth TD. Psychosocial factors in living organ donation: clinical and ethical challenges. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2008;22:192–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2008.04.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Järvholm S, Johannesson L, Clarke A, Brännström M. Uterus transplantation trial: psychological evaluation of recipients and partners during the post-transplantation year. Fertil Steril. 2015;104:1010–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.06.038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Erim Y, Beckmann M, Valentin-Gamazo C, Malago M, Frilling A, Schlaak J, et al. Selection of donors for adult living-donor liver donation: results of the assessment of the first 205 donor candidates. Psychosomatics. 2008;49:143–51.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.psy.49.2.143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Potts M, Evans DW. Is solid organ donation by living donors ethical? The case of kidney donation. In: Weimar W, Bos MA, Busschbach JJ, editors. Organ transplantation: ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects. Towards a common European policy. Lengerich: Pabst Sci Publ; 2008.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ladwig KH, Lederbogen F, Albus C, et al. Position paper on the importance of psychosocial factors in cardiology: update 2013. Ger Med Sci. 2014;12:Doc09.  https://doi.org/10.3205/000194.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Davidson KW, et al. The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice: the emerging field of behavioral cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:637–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Albus C, Ladwig KH, Herrmann-Lingen C. Psychocardiology. Clinically relevant recommendations regarding selected cardiovascular diseases. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2014;139:596–601.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rutledge T, Redwine LS, Linke SE, et al. A meta-analysis of mental health treatments and cardiac rehabilitation for improving clinical outcomes and depression among patients with coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med. 2013;75:335–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Whalley B, Rees K, Davies P. Psychological interventions for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; CD002902.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grover S, Kate N. Somatic symptoms in consultation-liaison psychiatry. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013;25:52–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Elman I, Zubieta JK, Borsook D. The missing p in psychiatric training: why it is important to teach pain to psychiatrists. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(1):12–20.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010;174.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Voon P, Karamouzian M, Kerr T. Chronic pain and opioid misuse: a review of reviews. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2017;12:36.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-017-0120-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Turk DC. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for patients with chronic pain. Clin J Pain. 2002;18:355–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zeeberg P, Olesen J, Jensen R. Efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment in a tertiary referral headache centre. Cephalalgia. 2005;25:1159–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Zipfel
    • 1
  • Anne Herrmann-Werner
    • 1
  • Florian Junne
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and PsychotherapyUniversity Medical HospitalTuebingenGermany

Personalised recommendations