Advertisement

Bearing Witness to ‘Irreparable Harm’: Incorporating Affective Activity as Practice into Ethics

  • Kim Barker
  • Catriona Ida Macleod
Chapter

Abstract

Research with individuals who have experienced trauma requires careful consideration. In preparing the ethics protocol for an ethnographic study of an anti-rape protest, we gave careful consideration to the potential ethical challenges in accordance with the University ethics code. However, this process did not prepare the first author for the dynamic and reciprocal positioning she encountered in relationships in the field or the ‘ethically important’ moment-by-moment decision-making which this required of her. Drawing on the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas, a feminist reading of the contemporary ‘turn to affect’, and examples from our research, we show how ethical decision-making in ethnographic research is always relational and dialogical, both in our direct interactions with participants and in the ways in which we approach our ‘data’.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the reviewers and editors for their thoughtful input on this chapter. We also gratefully acknowledge the support of both the Mellon Foundation and the National Research Foundation for Kim’s doctoral studies which form the basis of this chapter. Catriona’s work is supported by the South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation of South Africa (grant number: 87582).

References

  1. Andersson, N., & Ho-Foster, A. (2008). 13, 915 reasons for equity in sexual offences legislation: A national school-based survey in South Africa. International Journal for Equity in Health, 7(1), 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, N., Paredes-Solis, S., Milne, D., Omer, K., Marokoane, N., Laetsang, D., & Cockroft, A. (2012). Prevalence and risk factors for forced or coerced sex among school-going youth: National cross-sectional studies in 10 southern African countries in 2003 and 2007. BMJ Open, 2(2), e000745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callender, T., & Dartnall, L. (2011). Mental health responses for victims of sexual violence and rape in resource-poor settings. Briefing Paper, Sexual Violence Research Initiative, Medical Research Council, South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.svri.org/MentalHealthResponses.pdf
  4. Campbell, R., Self, T., Wasco, S., & Ahrens, C. (2004). Doing community research without a community: Creating safe space for rape survivors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33(3/4), 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Draucker, C. (1999). The emotional impact of sexual violence research on participants. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, XIII(4), 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Du Toit, L. (2005). A phenomenology of rape: Forging a new vocabulary for action. In A. Gouws (Ed.), (Un)thinking citizenship: Feminist debates in contemporary South Africa. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  7. Frank, A. W. (1995). The wounded storyteller: Body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Frank, A. W. (2000). The standpoint of storyteller. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 354–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Frank, A. W. (2005). What is dialogical research, and why should we do it? Qualitative Health Research, 15(7), 964–974. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305279078 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gavey, N. (2011). Feminist poststructuralism and discourse analysis revisited. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(1), 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guellemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2015). Emotions, narratives, and ethical mindfulness. Academic Medicine, 90(6), 726–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guzak, J. R. (2015). Affect in ethical decision making: Mood matters. Ethics & Behavior, 25(5), 386–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hatley, J. (2000). Suffering witness: The quandary of responsibility after the irreparable. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  14. Herman, J. (1997). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence—from domestic abuse to political terror (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Jewkes, R., Watts, C., Abrahams, N., Penn-Kekana, L., & Garcia-Moreno, C. (2000). Ethical and methodological issues in conducting research on gender-based violence in Southern Africa. Reproductive Health Matters, 18(15), 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalichman, S. C., Simbayi, L. C., Kaufman, M., Cain, D., Cherry, C., Jooste, S., & Mathiti, V. (2005). Gender attitudes, sexual violence, and HIV/AIDS risks among men and women in Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Sex Research, 42(4), 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Komesaroff, P. (1995). From bioethics to microethics: Ethical debate and clinical medicine. In P. Komesaroff (Ed.), Troubled bodies: Critical perspectives on postmodernism, medical ethics and the body (pp. 62–86). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Levinas, E. (1974/1981). Otherwise than being or beyond essence. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Leys, R. (2011). The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 434–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McAvoy, J. (2015). From ideology to feeling: Discourse, emotion, and an analytic synthesis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(1), 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKenzie-Mohr, S., & Lafrance, M. (2011). Telling stories without the words: ‘Tightrope talk’ in women’s accounts of coming to live well after rape or depression. Feminism & Psychology, 21(1), 49–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moffet, H. (2006). ‘These women, they force us to rape them’: Rape as narrative of social control in post-apartheid South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 32(1), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharratt, S. (2011). Gender, shame and sexual violence: The voices of witnesses and court members at war crimes tribunals. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Stetler.Google Scholar
  24. Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wetherell, M. (2015). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body & Society, 21(2), 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kim Barker
    • 1
  • Catriona Ida Macleod
    • 2
  1. 1.Rhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Critical Studies in Sexualities and Reproduction, Department of PsychologyRhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations