Conclusion: The Tapestry Unpicked?

  • James Rosbrook-Thompson
  • Gary Armstrong
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Urban Anthropology book series (PSUA)

Abstract

In concluding the book, we seek to do a number of things. First, we summarise each of the preceding chapters, picking out their central findings. We then attempt to draw out the significance of these findings, considering them in relation to wider themes such as notions of self-responsibility and the social contract. Finally, we reflect on the book’s key concepts of superdiversity and social mix, and question how, given current trends, they might be used to analyse social relations on estates like LG.

References

  1. Arestis, P. (Ed.). (2004). Neo-liberal Economic Policy: Critical Essays. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R. (2015, August 25). The Super-Rich in London: They Live Amongst Us, but You Won’t Run into Them (If They Can Help It). LSE British Politics and Policy Blog.Google Scholar
  3. Back, L. (2015, May 5). Losing Culture or Finding Superdiversity? Discover Society, 20.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Blandy, S., & Hunter, C. (2013). The Right to Buy: Examination of an Exercise in Allocating, Shifting and Rebranding Risks. Critical Social Policy, 33(1), 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, W. (2017). Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Brooklyn: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  7. Eglot, J. (2017, June 28). Council Homes Sold Off Almost Three Times as Fast as New Ones Are Built. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  8. Foster, D. (2015, December 7). Right to Buy: A History of Margaret Thatcher’s Controversial Policy. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  9. Hamnett, C. (2003). Unequal City: London in the Global Arena. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Harvey, D. (2010). The Enigma of Capital and the Crises of Capitalism. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  11. Manning, A. (2014). Immigrants’ Access to Social Housing: Perception and Reality. CentrePiece (Spring), 11–13.Google Scholar
  12. McKenzie, L. (2012). Getting by: Estates, Class and Culture in Austerity Britain. Bristol: Policy press.Google Scholar
  13. Murphy, J. (2016, March 10). London Boroughs ‘Forced to Sell Off Council Housing’. Evening Standard.Google Scholar
  14. Nast, J., & Blokland, T. (2014). Social Mix Revisited: Neighbourhood Institutions as Setting for Boundary Work and Social Capital. Sociology, 48(3), 482–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sampson, R. (2009). Disparity and Diversity in the Contemporary City: Social (Dis)order Revisited. British Journal of Sociology, 60(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shrubsole, D. (2014, January 10). Housing Benefit Cuts for Under-25s: Young People Again Feel the Worst of It. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  17. Small, M. (2017, March 31). Generation Rent Faces Retirement Disaster Unless They Start Saving. City Wire.Google Scholar
  18. Wessendorf, S. (2013). Commonplace Diversity: Social Relations in a Super-Diverse Context. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Wikström, P. O. (2008). Situational Action Theory. In B. Fisher & S. Labs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Victimology and Crime Prevention. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Rosbrook-Thompson
    • 1
  • Gary Armstrong
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesAnglia Ruskin UniversityCambridgeUK
  2. 2.College of Business, Arts and Social SciencesBrunel University LondonUxbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations