Mater Out of Place? Women, Mobility, Livelihood and Power

  • James Rosbrook-Thompson
  • Gary Armstrong
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Urban Anthropology book series (PSUA)

Abstract

In this chapter, we examine how women on LG from different ethno-national, religious and class backgrounds developed strategies when it came to ‘getting by’, looking after children, forging and sustaining romantic relationships, and moving around the city. Though the voices of women are a prominent and integral part of other chapters in this book, the issues listed above were particularly central in the lives of LG’s female residents and would—we believe—be best considered and analysed in a separate chapter. In examining these issues, we draw on works such as McKenzie’s (Getting by: Estates, Class and Culture in Austerity Britain, 2012) study of St Ann’s estate in Nottingham, Watt’s (Urban Studies, 40(9), 1769–1789, 2003, Housing Studies, 20(3), 359–381, 2005) research into the housing and employment trajectories of council tenants in inner London and Fenster’s (A Companion to Feminist Geography, 2005) investigation into gendered dimensions of belonging and mobility in London and Jerusalem.

References

  1. Blandy, S., & Hunter, C. (2013). The Right to Buy: Examination of an Exercise in Allocating, Shifting and Re-branding Risks. Critical Social Policy, 33(1), 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fenster, T. (2005). Gender and the City: The Different Formations of Belonging. In L. Nelson & J. Seager (Eds.), A Companion to Feminist Geography (pp. 242–256). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Lee, P., & Townsend, P. (1994). A Study of Inequality, Low Incomes and Unemployment in London, 1985–92. International Labour Review, 133(5–6), 579–595.Google Scholar
  4. Luxton, M., Rosenberg, H., & Arat-Koc, S. (1990). Through the Kitchen Window: The Politics of Home and Family. Toronto: Garamond Press.Google Scholar
  5. McKenzie, L. (2012). Getting by: Estates, Class and Culture in Austerity Britain. Bristol: Policy press.Google Scholar
  6. Miller, J. (2015, December 15). The Labor Prospect: Is There an On-Demandate? The American Prospect.Google Scholar
  7. Nast, J., & Blokland, T. (2014). Social Mix Revisited: Neighbourhood Institutions as Setting for Boundary Work and Social Capital. Sociology, 48(3), 482–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Powell, J., & Taylor, P. (2016). Rethinking Risk and Ageing: Extending Working Lives. Social Policy and Society, 15(4), 637–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sennett, R. (2003). Respect: The Formation of Character in an Age of Inequality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Shelley, T. (2013). Exploited: Migrant Labour in the New Global Economy. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  11. Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-Diversity and Its Implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Watt, P. (2003). Urban Marginality and Labour MarketRestructuring: Local Authority Tenants and Employment in an Inner London Borough. Urban Studies, 40(9), 1769–1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Watt, P. (2005). Housing Histories and Fragmented Middle-Class Careers: The Case of Marginal Professionals in London Council Housing. Housing Studies, 20(3), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Rosbrook-Thompson
    • 1
  • Gary Armstrong
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesAnglia Ruskin UniversityCambridgeUK
  2. 2.College of Business, Arts and Social SciencesBrunel University LondonUxbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations