“Can This White Guy Sing the Blues?” Disability, Race, and Decolonisation in South African Higher Education

  • Brian WatermeyerEmail author


In post-apartheid South Africa, several identity groups (pertaining to race, gender, sexuality, and other markers) vie for access to limited resources. Claims are staked based on a group’s perceived historical suffering—that is, the question of whether, and to what extent, its members fit the category of “previously disadvantaged”. South Africa’s colossal racial trauma means that when any interest group competes with race, its claims are demolished, giving rise to the question of “who can suffer?” Recent years have witnessed widespread protests, with universities grappling with demands for faster transformation in racial representativity, fee-free education, and the decolonisation of curricula, public identities, and procedures. Into this melee comes disability, which is known to disrupt categorical assumptions about class, race, exclusion, and poverty. Making use of the author’s own positionality as a White, male, disabled South African university academic, this chapter attempts to figure disability disadvantage against this backdrop, querying how the hegemony of race-based logic can operate as a psychic defence against the complexity which disability brings. In the process, key challenges facing tertiary institutions, such as the rise of populism, the forging of decolonised identities, and the deepening of democracy, are considered.


  1. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Davis, L. J. (2002). Bending over backwards: Disability, dismodernism and other difficult positions. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Delgado, R. (2011). Rodrigo’s reconsideration: Intersectionality and the future of critical race theory. Iowa Law Review, 96, 1247–1288.Google Scholar
  4. Erevelles, N. (2011). Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erevelles, N., & Minear, A. (2010). Unspeakable offenses: Untangling race and disability in discourses of intersectionality. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4(2).
  6. Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Dilemmas of justice in a ‘post-socialist’ age. New Left Review, 212, 68–92.Google Scholar
  7. Garland-Thomson, R. (2009). Staring. In How we look. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Gill, C. J. (2001). Divided understandings: The social experience of disability. In G. Albrecht, K. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 351–372). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillborn, D. (2015). Intersectionality, critical race theory, and the primacy of racism: Race, class, gender, and disability in education. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(3), 277–287. Scholar
  10. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Higgs, P. (2016). The African renaissance and the transformation of the higher education curriculum in South Africa. Africa Education Review, 13(1), 87–101. Scholar
  12. Horsthemke, K. (2017). Transmission and transformation in higher education: Indigenisation, internationalisation and transculturality. Transformation in Higher Education, 2(0), a12. Scholar
  13. Kleinman, A., Das, V., & Lock, M. (1997). Social suffering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Koraan, R., & Geduld, A. (2015). Corrective rape of lesbians in the era of transformative constitutionalism in South Africa. P.E.R, 15(5). Retrieved from Accessed 21 Sept 2017.
  15. Marks, D. (1999). Disability: Controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Mbembe, A. (2016). Decolonizing the university: New directions. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 15(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1771–1800. Scholar
  18. Mekoa, I. (2011). Discourses and politics of racism in higher education in South Africa. Africa Insight, 40(4), 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Motsei, M. (2007). The kanga and the kangaroo court: Reflections on the rape trial of Jacob Zuma. Johannesburg: Jacana.Google Scholar
  20. Murris, K. (2016). #Rhodes must fall: A posthumanist orientation to decolonising higher education institutions. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(3), 274–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Riddle, C. A. (2014). Disability and justice: The capabilities approach in practice. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  22. Roulstone, A., & Mason-Bish, H. (Eds.). (2012). Disability, hate, crime and violence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Scotch, R. (1988). Disability as the basis for a social movement: Advocacy and the politics of definition. Journal of Social Issues, 44(1), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability rights and wrongs revisited (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. South African National Council for the Blind (SANCB). (2010). Our vision. Retrieved from Accessed 21 Sept 2017.
  26. Spiegel, S., Gray, H., Bompani, B., Bardosh, K., & Smith, J. (2017). Decolonising online development studies? Emancipatory aspirations and critical reflections – A case study. Third World Quarterly, 38(2), 270–290. Scholar
  27. Stienstra, D., & Nyerere, L. (2016). Race, ethnicity and disability: Charting complex and intersectional terrains. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the global South: The critical handbook (pp. 255–268). New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2011). Global study on homicide: Trends, contexts, data. Retrieved from Accessed 21 Sept 2017.
  30. Watermeyer, B. (2002). Blindness, attachment and self: Psychoanalysis and ideology. Free Associations, 49, 335–352.Google Scholar
  31. Watermeyer, B. (2012). Is it possible to create a politically engaged, contextual psychology of disability? Disability & Society, 27(2), 161–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Watermeyer, B. (2013). Towards a contextual psychology of disablism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Watermeyer, B. (2014). Freedom to read: A personal account of the ‘book famine’. African Journal of Disability, 3(1).
  34. Watermeyer, B. (2016). ‘I don’t have time for an emotional life’: Marginalization, dependency and melancholic suspension in disability. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 41(1), 142–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Watermeyer, B., & Swartz, L. (2008). Conceptualising the psycho-emotional aspects of disability and impairment: The distortion of personal and psychic boundaries. Disability and Society, 23(6), 599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Watermeyer, B., & Swartz, L. (2016). Disablism, identity and self: Discrimination as a traumatic assault on subjectivity. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26(3), 268–276. Scholar
  37. Watermeyer, B., Swartz, L., Schneider, M., Lorenzo, T., & Priestley, M. (Eds.). (2006). Disability and social change: A South African agenda. Pretoria: HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wright, K. (1991). Vision and separation: Between mother and baby. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  39. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006). Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 193–209. Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Disability Studies, Department of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity of Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations