Advertisement

Disability and Citizenship in the Global South in a Post-truth Era

  • Leslie Swartz
Chapter

Abstract

The ascendance of Donald Trump to the presidency has been extensively discussed with reference to disability rights in the USA; there has been less consideration of the implications of the Trump era for disability rights in the Global South. The “America first” doctrine coupled with the president’s disablism are reasons for concern. This chapter, however, deals with the context of the “post-truth” era. The disregard of Trump and his allies for the truth, and the authoritarian implications of this, must be resisted. However, the epistemic exclusion of disabled people in the Global South needs recognition. Excluded people have knowledge and expertise. It is a mistake to accept that there is an easy distinction between “truth” as defined by a narrow understanding of science on the one hand and “lies” as typified by the falsehoods perpetrated by Trump and his allies on the other hand. An understanding of the social context of knowledge for and about disability in the Global South requires us to be more nuanced and self-critical in thinking about what constitutes useful and useable knowledge.

References

  1. Albert, B., & Harrison, M. (2005). Messages from research. Disability knowledge and research (KaR) programme. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08c8aed915d622c0013ef/DisabilityKaRMessagesFromResearch.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  2. Andersen, K. (2017). Fantasyland: How America went haywire: A 500-year history. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, H. (1973). The origins of totalitarianism (New edition with added prefaces). New York: Harvest Books, Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovitch.Google Scholar
  4. Bantjes, J., & Swartz, L. (2017). The cultural turn in critical suicidology: What can we claim and what do we know? Death Studies, 41, 512–520.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2017.1333355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bompani, B., & Valois, C. (2017). Sexualizing politics: The anti-homosexuality bill, party-politics and the new political dispensation in Uganda. Critical African Studies, 9(1), 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Center for American Progress. (2017). 5 ways President Trump’s agenda is a disaster for people with disabilities. Retrieved from https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/poverty/news/2017/03/08/427629/5-ways-president-trumps-agenda-disaster-people-disabilities/. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  7. Chitando, E., & Mateveke, P. (2017). Africanizing the discourse on homosexuality: Challenges and prospects. Critical African Studies, 9(1), 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CNN. (2017). Conway: Trump white house offered ‘alternative facts’ on crowd size. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2017/01/22/politics/kellyanne-conway-alternative-facts/index.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  9. Cooper, A. C., & Rashid, K. K. (2015). Citizenship, politics, difference: Perspectives from sub-Saharan signed language communities. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Corbett, K. (2017). Trump trauma. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 27(2), 117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cork, S. J., Jaeger, P. T., Jette, S., & Ebrahimoff, S. (2017). The politics of (dis) information: Crippled America, the 25th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the 2016 US Presidential Campaign. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion, 1–15.Google Scholar
  12. Corner, J. (2017). Fake news, post-truth and media–political change. Media, Culture and Society, 39, 1100–1107.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717726743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cousins, S. (2015). Could Syria really be polio free? Nature Middle East. Retrieved from http://www.natureasia.com/en/nmiddleeast/article/10.1038/nmiddleeast.2015.38. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  14. Crane, B., & Maguire, E. (2017). First: Aid: The future of US foreign aid in the Trump administration. Conscience, 38, 19–31.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, S. E. (2010). Hitler’s forgotten victims: The holocaust and the disabled. Brimscombe Port/Stroud: The History Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garland-Thomson, R. (2005). Feminist disability studies. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(2), 1557–1587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gichane, M. W., Heap, M., Fontes, M., & London, L. (2017). “They must understand we are people”: Pregnancy and maternity service use among signing deaf women in Cape Town. Disability and Health Journal, 10(3), 434–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giroux, H. A. (2015). Dangerous thinking in the age of the new authoritarianism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Giroux, H. A. (2016). Political frauds, Donald Trump, and the ghost of totalitarianism. Knowledge Cultures, 4(5), 95–108.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, M. C. (2017). Obscured social construction as epistemic harm. Journal of Social Philosophy, 48(3), 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harnish, A. (2017). Ableism and the Trump phenomenon. Disability & Society, 32(3), 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ho, A. (2011). Trusting experts and epistemic humility in disability. IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 4(2), 102–123.Google Scholar
  24. Houtondji, P. (1983). African philosophy: Myth and reality. London: Hutchinson University Library for Africa.Google Scholar
  25. Imada, A. L. (2017). A decolonial disability studies? Disability Studies Quarterly, (3), 37.  https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i3.
  26. Jakupec, V. (2018). Development aid: Populism and the end of the neoliberal agenda, Springer briefs in philosophy. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jasanoff, S., & Simmet, H. R. (2017). No funeral bells: Public reason in a “post-truth” age. Social Studies of Science, 47(5), 751–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kritzinger, J., Schneider, M., Swartz, L., & Braathen, S. H. (2014). “I just answer ‘yes’ to everything they say”: Access to health care for deaf people in Worcester, South Africa and the politics of exclusion. Patient Education and Counseling, 94, 379–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.12.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lo, N. C., & Barry, M. (2017). The perils of trumping science in global health—The Mexico City policy and beyond. New England Journal of Medicine, 376(15), 1399–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKee, M., Greer, S. L., & Stuckler, D. (2017). What will Donald Trump’s presidency mean for health? A scorecard. The Lancet, 389(10070), 748–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitra, S., Palmer, M., Kim, H., Mont, D., & Groce, N. (2017). Extra costs of living with a disability: A systematized review and agenda for research. Disability and Health Journal, 10, 475–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moss, T., & Smith, J. (2015). Robert Mugabe is again driving Zimbabwe over the cliff: Why Washington and the IMF shouldn’t go with them. Africa Times. Retrieved from http://africatimes.com/2015/09/11/robert-mugabe-is-again-driving-zimbabwe-over-the-cliff-why-washington-and-the-imf-shouldnt-go-with-them/. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  33. MSN. (2017). Trump denies authenticity of access Hollywood tape. https://www.msn.com/en-us/video/news/trump-denies-authenticity-of-access-hollywood-tape/vi-BBFQ2Sd. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  34. Nattrass, N. (2007). Mortal combat: AIDS denialism and the struggle for antiretrovirals in South Africa. Pietermaritzburg: UKZN Press.Google Scholar
  35. New York Times. (2016). Transcript: Donald Trump’s taped comments about women. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/08/us/donald-trump-tape-transcript.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  36. O’Brien, R. (2003). From a doctor’s to a judge’s gaze: Epistemic communities and the history of disability rights policy in the workplace. Polity, 35(3), 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Owusu-Ansah, F. E., & Mji, G. (2013). African indigenous knowledge and research. African Journal of Disability, 2(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Palmer, M., Groce, N., Mont, D., Nguyen, O. H., & Mitra, S. (2015). The economic lives of people with disabilities in Vietnam. PLoS One, 10(7), e0133623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Priebe, J. (2018). Disability and its correlates in a developing country context: Evidence from multiple datasets and measures. The Journal of Development Studies, 54(4), 657–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Said, E. (1994). Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  41. Shakespeare, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Starrs, A. M. (2017). The Trump global gag rule: An attack on US family planning and global health aid. The Lancet, 389(10068), 485–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Swartz, L. (2014). Five challenges for disability-related research in sub-Saharan Africa. African Journal of Disability, 3(2), Art. #149, 6 pages.  https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v3i2.149.
  44. Swartz, L. (2016). Research training and the organizational politics of knowledge: Some lessons from training disabled researchers in southern Africa. In E. G. Iriate, R. McConkey, & R. Gilligan (Eds.), Disability and human rights: Global perspectives (pp. 259–272). London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  45. Swartz, L. (2018). Building capacity or enforcing normalcy? Engaging with disability scholarship in Africa. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 15(1), 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Visagie, S., Eide, A. H., Dyrstad, K., Mannan, H., Swartz, L., Schneider, M., et al. (2017). Factors related to environmental barriers experienced by persons with and without disabilities in diverse African settings. PLoS One, 12(10), e0186342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Washington Post. (2016). Donald Trump’s revisionist history of mocking a disabled reporter. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/08/02/donald-trumps-revisionist-history-of-mocking-a-disabled-reporter/?utm_term=.c583da80b016. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  48. World Health Organization (WHO) and World Bank. (2011). World disability report. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyStellenbosch UniversityStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations