Advertisement

Working Together: Making Inclusive Development a Reality

  • Theresa Lorenzo
  • Peter Coleridge
Chapter

Abstract

Inclusive development takes different forms in different countries, in recognition of the differences in social, economic, political, and cultural contexts. Disability adds another layer of complexity in addressing injustice and oppression over many generations. Our two triangles provide the way forward in making the vision of inclusive, sustainable development a reality: eschewing dominance, promoting justice, and supporting positive identity are the three pillars that enable reciprocal relationships between development practitioners and disabled people. Inclusion and empowerment are the main strategies, and the whole approach is made sustainable by having a shared vision. The many stories of success come from the innovation in thinking and doing that occurs when groups of people come together to take collective action. Disabled people need to be seen as active contributors in their communities and not just advocates for their own issues.

References

  1. Coleridge, P. (1993). Disability, liberation and development. Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar
  2. Lorenzo, T. (2003). No African renaissance without disabled women: A new way of looking at social and economic development of disabled women in South Africa. Disability and Society, 18(6), 759–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lorenzo, T. (2008, March). “We are also travelers”: An action story about disabled women mobilising for an accessible public transport system in Khayelitsha and Nyanga, Cape Metropole, South Africa. SAJOT, 39(1), 32–40.Google Scholar
  4. Lorenzo, T. (2010). Listening spaces: Connecting diverse voices for social action and change. In M. Savin-Baden & C. Howell Major (Eds.), New approaches for qualitative research: Wisdom and uncertainty (pp. 131–144). London/New York: Routledge Taylor/Francis Group.Google Scholar
  5. Lorenzo, T., & Joubert, R. (2011). Reciprocal capacity building for collaborative disability research between disabled people’s organizations, communities and higher education institutions. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 18(4), 254–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lorenzo, T., Motau, J., van der Merwe, T., van Rensburg, E. J., & Cramm, J. M. (2014). Community rehabilitation workers as catalysts for disability-inclusive youth development through service learning. Development in Practice, 25(1), 19–29.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2015.983461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lorenzo, T., van Pletzen, E., & Booyens, M. (2015). Determining the competences of community based workers for disability-inclusive development in rural areas of South Africa, Botswana and Malawi. International Journal for Rural and Remote Health, 15, 2919. Retrieved from https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/2919. Accessed 12 Feb 2017.
  8. MacLachlan, M., Carr, S., & McAuliffe, E. (2013). The aid triangle: Recognizing the human dynamics of dominance, justice and identity. New York/London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  9. Majiet, S. (2014). “Disabled women must stand up”: Exploring the leadership experiences of disabled women in disabled people’s organisations in Zimbabwe. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  10. Malinga, J. (2008). A study to determine the level of awareness by People With Disabilities (PWDs) in Zimbabwe about the African Decade of Disabled Persons (ADDP). Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town.Google Scholar
  11. Max Neef, M. A. (1991). Human scale development: Conception, application and further reflections. New York: The Apex Press.Google Scholar
  12. Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom (2nd ed.). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Taylor, J. (2003). Organisations and development—Towards building a practice. Cape Town: CDRA.Google Scholar
  14. United Nations. (1984). Standard rules on the equalisation of opportunities. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  15. United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html
  16. Westoby, P. (2014). Theorising the practice of community development: A South African perspective. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. WHO and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  18. World Health Organization (WHO). (2010). Community-based rehabilitation guidelines. Retrieved from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44405/7/9789241548052_health_eng.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Disability Studies and Division of Occupational Therapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity Cape TownCape TownSouth Africa
  2. 2.Independent ConsultantLlandrindodUK

Personalised recommendations