Advertisement

Specialist Training in Forensic Psychiatry in Europe

  • Norbert Nedopil
  • Pamela Taylor
Chapter

Abstract

This paper explores the training of specialists in forensic psychiatry in Europe. In Germany, Sweden, Switzerland and the UK, forensic psychiatry is a recognised medical specialty, and each has a recognised training programme for developing knowledge and relevant competencies; satisfactory completion results in issue of a certificate of completed clinical training (CCT). Ireland and Belgium offer some recognised specialist practice training, while other countries, like Austria, the Netherlands and Spain, make courses available to improve the quality of forensic assessments or the management of mentally disturbed offenders. Since the turn of the millennium, there have been increasing efforts to develop a mutual understanding of forensic psychiatry between the countries of the European Union (EU). The Ghent Group promotes mutually informed developments in training. Since its first meeting in 2004 in Ghent, Belgium, it has held annual conferences. Since 2010, in collaboration with the universities of Munich, Cardiff and Antwerp and the Max Planck Institute for International Criminal Law, and with support from Danish forensic psychiatrists, the UK Royal College of Psychiatrists and Bildungswerk Irsee in Bavaria (Germany), it has run a 4-day seminar, bringing together trainees and consultants from European countries. Participants not only learn about other systems but also improve their understanding of their own legal system, by having to explain it to other participants. International training in Europe seems to provide an increasing advantage, not only for informing practice and service development but also for interpreting research data from each other’s countries and promoting research collaborations.

References

  1. 1.
    Fazel S, Seewald K. Severe mental illness in 33 588 prisoners worldwide: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2012;200:364–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    SWANZDSAJCS. Offenders with mental disorder on five continents: a comparison of approaches to treatment and demographic factors relevant to measurement of outcome. Int J Forensic Ment Health. 2009;8:81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salize HJ, Dreßing H. Coercion, involuntary treatment and quality of mental health care: is there any link? Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2005;18:576–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salize HJ, Dreßing H, editors. Placement and treatment of mentally disordered offenders: Legislation and practice in the [old] European Union. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers; 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cassells-Barker A, van Lier E, Taylor PJ. Services for offender patients: European perspectives (available from second author). in preparation.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casselman J, Bobon D, Cosyns P, Wilmotte J, Arteel P, Depreeuw W, DeRuyver B, Janssen V, Mormont C, Snacken S, editors. Forensic psychiatry in Europe. Leuven: Law and Mental Health; 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grounds A, Gunn J, Myers WC, Rosner R, Busch KG. Contemplating common ground in the professional ethics of forensic psychiatry. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2010;20:307–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gunn J, Nedopil N. European training in forensic psychiatry. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2005;15:207–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nedopil N, Gunn J, Thomson L. Teaching forensic psychiatry in Europe. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2012;22(4):238–46.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1845.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nedopil N, Taylor P, Gunn J. Forensic psychiatry in Europe: the perspective of the Ghent Group. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2015;19(2):80–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taylor PJ, Woolfenden N, Nedopil N. Forensic psychiatry training in Europe. Die Psychiatrie. 2013;3:181–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas A. What about forensic psychiatry as a career? Undergraduate and early post-graduate medical perspectives. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2012;22(4):247–51.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1838.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Grady J. Time to talk. Commentary on forensic psychiatry and general psychiatry. Psychiatr Bull. 2008;32:6–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Turner T, Salter M. Forensic psychiatry: re-examining the relationship. Psychiatr Bull. 2008;32:2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McInerny T. Dutch TBS forensic services: a personal view. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2000;10:231–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gómez-Durán E, Muñoz García-Largo L. Training in forensic psychiatry when no nationally recognised scheme exists. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2012;22:257–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thomson LD, Goethals K, Nedopil N. Multi agency working in forensic psychiatry: theory and practice in Europe. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2016;26(3):153–60.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.1998.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gunn J. Forensic psychiatry as a subspecialty. IntJLaw Psychiatry. 1982;5:65–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forensic PsychiatryPsychiatric Hospital of the University (LMU) of MünchenMunichGermany
  2. 2.Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical NeurosciencesCardiff University School of MedicineCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations