Advertisement

Lighting Standards for Ships and Energy Efficiency

  • Efe AkyurekEmail author
Chapter
Part of the WMU Studies in Maritime Affairs book series (WMUSTUD, volume 6)

Abstract

Through the significant effects of lighting on human psychology, adequate lighting on board provides morale and motivation to a ship’s crew therefore improving performance. This chapter aims to explore simultaneously the issues of energy efficiency and optimal lighting, considering existing regulations on shipboard lighting with the determination of adequate lighting for crew. After a brief introduction, in the first part, preferred lighting tendencies are discussed on a maritime regulatory basis, including international maritime conventions compared with International Labor Organization 92/133 Conventions. The second part defines optimal lighting for crew accommodation and working areas by demonstrating an example of a river–type vessel. The third part emphasizes alternative energy sources, such as natural lighting methods, that could create remarkable energy efficiency on the selected river–type vessel. In conclusion, in order to provide optimal lighting for human comfort onboard, alternative energy sources should be fully exploited, with natural lighting methods standing out. Of course artificial lighting will still be there, but any reduction of energy consumption on board a vessel will contribute to energy efficiency.

Keywords

Ship skylight Lighting regulations Efficient lighting Optimal lux 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author owes special thanks to Prof. Dr. Aykut I. Ölçer from World Maritime University; additionally, he would like to thank the review committee for their valuable comments and critics.

References

  1. Bommel, W. J. M., Beld, G. J., & Ooyen, M. H. F. (2002). Industrial lighting and productivity. Philips. http://www.iar.unicamp.br/lab/luz/ld/Arquitetural/interiores/ilumina%E7%E3o%20industrial/industrial_lighting_and_productivity%5B1%5D.pdf. Accessed on 22 October 2016.
  2. Department of Defense. (1986). Lighting on naval ships. Washington, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Edwards, L., & Torcelini, P. (2002). A literature review of the effects of natural light on building occupants. Colorado, US: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Elliott, F. S., & Kobus, D. A. (1992). Standardizing shipboard lighting: Light fixtures and light bulbs on U.S. Navy Ships. San Diego, CA: Naval Health Research Center. http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA273682, Accessed on 01 September 2016.Google Scholar
  5. Falchi, F., Cinzano, P., Elvidge, C. D., Keith, D. M., & Haim, A. (2011). Limiting the impact of light pollution on human health, environment and stellar visibility. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2714–2722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harb, F., Hidalgo, M. P., & Martau, B. (2014). Lack of exposure to natural light in the workspace is associated with physiological, sleep and depressive symptoms. Chronobiology International, 32(3), 368–375.  https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2014.982757 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heerwagen, J. H. (2000). Green buildings, organizational success, and occupant productivity (Vol. 28, No. 5). London, UK: Building Research and Information.Google Scholar
  8. Herrmann, R. (1984). The Ship’s lighting. In W. H. G. Goethe, E. N. Watson, & D. T. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of nautical medicine. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. ILO. (1996). Accident prevention on board ship at sea and in port. An ILO code of practice (2nd ed.). Geneva: International Labour Office. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_protect/@protrav/@safework/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_107798.pdf. Accessed 01 November 2016.Google Scholar
  10. Kassakian, J. G. (2013). Assessment of advanced solid state lighting. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.  https://doi.org/10.17226/18279. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lighting The Way For A Greener Ship. (2010). Marine log, 115(8), 30–31. Retrieved from https://search-proquest-com.dianus.libr.tue.nl/docview/758281481?accountid=27128.
  12. Ott Biolight Systems, Inc. (1997, October). Ergo biolight report. Santa Barbara, CA: Ott Biolight Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Savitz, M. (1986). The federal role in conservation research and development. In J. Byrne & D. Rich (Eds.), The politics of energy research and development, Energy policy studies series (Vol. 3, pp. 89–118). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Völker, S., Rüschenschmidt, H., & Gall, D. (1995). Beleuchtung und Unfallgeschehen am Arbeitsplatz, Zeitschrift für die Berufsgenossenschaften.Google Scholar
  15. Wulfinghoff, D. R. (2004). Energy efficiency manual. Wheaton, MD: Energy Institute Press.Google Scholar
  16. Wynn, T., Howarth, P. A., & Kunze, B. R. (2012). Night-time lookout duty: The role of ambient light levels and dark adaptation. Journal of Navigation, 65(4), 589–602.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463312000288 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Selami Ali Mah. Tank SokUskudar/IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations