Margaret of Anjou: Shakespeare’s Adapted Heroine

  • Charlene V. Smith
Part of the Queenship and Power book series (QAP)


Though appearing in four plays attributed to Shakespeare, Margaret of Anjou then disappeared almost completely from the English-speaking stage for 350 years. After World War II, several landmark cyclical productions in England rescued the three Henry VI plays from obscurity, proving their theatrical viability. The success of these productions helped inspire a growing trend of single-play adaptations centered on Margaret. Considered expressly feminist works by their creators, these adaptations reveal a canonical female character for women to perform on the magnitude of King Lear. Seeing the great role of Margaret as having been obscured by the economic and political considerations of the performance industry, modern writers and directors purposefully use adaptation in order to celebrate Shakespeare’s Margaret.


  1. Addenbrooke, David. 1974. The Royal Shakespeare Company: The Peter Hall Years. London: William Kemper.Google Scholar
  2. Agate, James. 1971. Brief Chronicles: A Survey of the Plays of Shakespeare and the Elizabethans in Actual Performance. New York: Benjamin Blom.Google Scholar
  3. Ashcroft, Peggy. 1978. “King Henry VI Parts 1, 2, and 3.” In Introductions to Shakespeare: Being the Introductions to the Individual Plays in the Folio Society Edition: 1950–76, ed. Charles Ede, 15–22. London: M. Joseph.Google Scholar
  4. Barton, John, and Peter Hall. 1970. The Wars of the Roses: Adapted for the Royal Shakespeare Company from William Shakespeare’s Henry VI, Parts 1, 2, 3 and Richard III. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Chernaik, Warren. 2007. The Cambridge Introduction to Shakespeare’s History Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke, Mary. 1958. Shakespeare at the Old Vic: Hamlet, King Henry VI, Parts I, II and III. Measure for Measure, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, King Lear, Twelfth Night, King Henry VIII. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  7. Coursen, H.R. 2001. “Theme and Design in Recent Productions of Henry VI.” In Henry VI: Critical Essays, ed. Pendleton Thomas, 205–218. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. “Current Productions.” Real Live Theatre. Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
  9. Daniell, David. 1979. “Opening Up the Text: Shakespeare’s Henry VI Plays in Performance.” In Drama and Society, ed. James Redmond, 247–277. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dash, Irene G. 1981. Wooing, Wedding, and Power: Women in Shakespeare’s Plays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dessen, Alan C. 2002. Rescripting Shakespeare: The Text, the Director, and Modern Productions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dugas, Don-John. 2006. Marketing the Bard: Shakespeare in Performance and Print, 1660–1740. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
  13. Elerding, Brian. 2016. The Rose Queen. Hometown Pasadena, February 7.
  14. “First Public Reading of ‘Shakespeare’s Most Feminist Play.’” 2016. Royal Holloway University of London (website). March 1.
  15. Grene, Nicholas. 2002. Shakespeare’s Serial History Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, Edward, and Roger Warren. 2001. Rose Rage: A Propeller Production Adapted from Shakespeare’s Henry VI Plays. London: Oberon.Google Scholar
  17. Hampton-Reeves, Stuart, and Carol Chillington Rutter. 2006. The Henry VI Plays. Shakespeare in Performance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hinchcliffe, Judith. 1984. comp. King Henry VI, an Annotated Bibliography. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  19. Hirsch, Foster. 1970. “The New York Shakespeare Festival—1970.” Shakespeare Quarterly 21 (4): 477–480. October 1. JSTOR.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hodgdon, Barbara. 1999. “Making It New: Katie Mitchell Refashions Shakespeare-History.” In Transforming Shakespeare: Contemporary Women’s Re-visions in Literature and Performance, ed. Marianne Novy, 13–33. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  21. Howard, Jean E., and Phyllis Rackin. 1997. Engendering a Nation: A Feminist Account of Shakespeare’s English Histories. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurwitt, Sam. 2016. Review: ‘New’ Shakespeare Play Strikes Feminist Chord. The Mercury News (San Jose, CA). September 8.
  23. Jackson, Barry. 2003. “On Producing Henry VI.” In Shakespeare Performance, ed. Catherine M.S. Alexander, 16–19. Cambridge Shakespeare Library 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Jameson, Anna. 1832. Shakespeare’s Heroines: Characteristics of Women, Moral, Poetical, & Historical. London: George Bell and Sons. Google Books.Google Scholar
  25. Kamaralli, Anna. 2010. “Daunted at a Woman’s Sight?: The Use and Abuse of Female Presence in Performances of the Histories as Cycles.” In Shakespeare’s English Histories and Their Afterlives, Shakespeare Survey, ed. Peter Holland, vol. 63, 172–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2012. Shakespeare and the Shrew: Performing the Defiant Female Voice, Palgrave Shakespeare Series. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Kindle.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kidnie, Margaret Jane. 2009. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. King, T.J. 2009. Casting Shakespeare’s Plays: London Actors and Their Roles, 1590–1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Leiter, Samuel L., ed. 1986. Shakespeare Around the Globe: A Guide to Notable Postwar Revivals. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lennox, Patricia. 2001. “Henry VI: A Television History in Four Parts.” In Henry VI: Critical Essays, ed. Pendleton Thomas, 235–252. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Levy, Jemma. 2016. Note From the Artistic Director / Adaptor-Playwright. Program for Queen Margaret. Muse of Fire Theatre Company. July 23–August 20.Google Scholar
  32. Lieber, Naomi C., and Lisa Scancella Shea. 2001. “Shakespeare’s Queen Margaret: Unruly or Unruled?” In Henry VI: Critical Essays, ed. Thomas A. Pendleton, 79–96. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Martin, Randall. 2000. “‘A Woman’s Generall, What Should We Feare?’: Queen Margaret Thatcherized in Recent Productions of 3 Henry VI.” In Shakespeare and His Contemporaries in Performance, ed. Edward J. Esche, 321–338. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. Maurer, Helen E. 2003. Margaret of Anjou: Queenship and Power in Late Medieval England. Woodbridge: Boydell.Google Scholar
  35. McDonald, Russ. 2014. “Peggy of Anjou.” In Women Making Shakespeare: Text, Reception, Performance, ed. Gordon McMullan, Lena Cowen Orlin, and Virginia Mason Vaughan, 263–272. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  36. Miletich IV Alex, and Emily Wilson. 2013. Reconstructing the Past: A Look into the Nature of Memory. Program for In Time of Roses, 21. Clarice Smith Performing Arts Center, University of Maryland. April 26–May 4.Google Scholar
  37. Morbyrne, Dan. 2016. Co-Adaptor’s Note. Program for The Life and Death of Queen Margaret. Real Live Theatre. July 29–August 6.Google Scholar
  38. Murray, Barbara A., ed. 2005. Shakespeare Adaptations from the Restoration: Five Plays. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nicholls, Liz. 2004. Bard’s Ruthless Margaret Gets Her Own Play. Edmonton Journal, February 5. Factiva.Google Scholar
  40. Orenstein, Natalie. 2016. Those Women Productions Find Feminism in the Classics. Berkleyside, September 1.
  41. Palmer, Henrietta L. 1859. The Stratford Gallery, Or, the Shakespeare Sisterhood: Comprising Forty-five Ideal Portraits. New York: D. Appleton. Hathitrust.Google Scholar
  42. Park, Clara Claiborne. 1983. “As We Like It: How a Girl Can Be Smart and Still Popular.” In The Woman’s Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare, ed. Carolyn Ruth Swift Lenz, Gayle Greene, and Carol Thomas Neely, 100–116. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  43. Pearson, Richard. 1990. A Band of Arrogant and United Heroes: The Story of the Royal Shakespeare Company Production of The Wars of the Roses. London: Adelphi Press.Google Scholar
  44. “Pioneer Valley Theatre News October 29, 2015”. Pioneer Valley Theatre (blog).
  45. Potter, Robert. Queen Margaret. Unpublished manuscript, last modified August 2001. PDF.Google Scholar
  46. ———. 1988. “The Rediscovery of Queen Margaret: The Wars of the Roses, 1963.” New Theatre Quarterly 4 (14): 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. “Queen Margaret.” 2016. Charlotte Now. April 22.
  48. Riggs, David. 1971. Shakespeare’s Heroical Histories; Henry VI and Its Literary Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. “RLT’s Staged Reading of ‘Queen Margaret’.” Brown Paper Tickets (website).
  50. Scharine, Richard G. 2001. “The Compleat Work of Henry VI (Abridged): A Comparison of Single-Play Adaptations at the Stratford, Ontario and Utah Shakespearean Festivals.” Journal of the Wooden O Symposium 1: 75–86.Google Scholar
  51. Schoone-Jongen, Terence. 2008. Shakespeare’s Companies: William Shakespeare’s Early Career and the Acting Companies, 1577–1594. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  52. Sexton, Michael. 2011. Director’s Note: Something About Margaret. Program for Margaret: A Tyger’s Heart. New York: Red Bull Theatre, February.Google Scholar
  53. “Shakespeare’s Rose Queen.” Ensemble Shakespeare Theater (website). Accessed 4 Apr 2017.
  54. Shakespeare, William. 2000. King Henry VI Part 1. Ed. Edward Burns. Arden 3rd Series. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2001a. King Henry VI Part 2. Ed. Ronald Knowles. Arden 3rd Series. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  56. ———. 2001b. King Henry VI Part 3. Ed. John D. Cox and Eric Rasmussen. Arden 3rd Series. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 1989. The Plantagenets. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  58. Sharplin, Scott. Prophetess. Unpublished Manuscript. Microsoft Word file.Google Scholar
  59. Shaughnessy, Robert. 1994. Representing Shakespeare: England, History and the RSC. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, Ashley. 2013. Director’s Note. Program for In Time of Roses, 20. Clarice Smith Performing Arts Center, University of Maryland. April 26–May 4.Google Scholar
  61. ———. In Time of Roses. Unpublished manuscript, last modified April 13, 2011. PDF.Google Scholar
  62. Sweet, Jeffrey. The Falcon’s Pitch. Unpublished manuscript, last modified November 1, 2006. Rich Text Document.Google Scholar
  63. Taylor, Gary. 1989. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History, from the Restoration to the Present. New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  64. Terry, Ellen. 1969. Four Lectures on Shakespeare. New York: Benjamin Blom.Google Scholar
  65. Walsh, Brian. 2009. Shakespeare, the Queen’s Men, and the Elizabethan Performance of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Webster, Margaret. 1975. Shakespeare without Tears. New York: Capricorn.Google Scholar
  67. Willis, Susan. 1991. The BBC Shakespeare Plays: Making the Televised Canon. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charlene V. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Brave Spirits TheatreAlexandriaUSA

Personalised recommendations