Advertisement

Organizational Artifacts as Pre-presentations of Things to Come: The Case of Menu Development in Haute Cuisine

  • Jochen Koch
  • Ninja Natalie Senf
  • Wasko Rothmann
Chapter

Abstract

Whereas the temporal mode of an organization’s past and present relies on material representations, an organization’s future has no material equivalent. Hence, the future of an organization is an ideal but not yet materialized phenomenon. In this chapter, we adopt a process perspective on organizational artifacts, their ongoing production and reproduction. We focus on how an organization’s past and present performance is inscribed into an organizational artifact and we explore how this process materializes as a pre-presentation of things to come. In doing so, we explore how performances resonate in artifacts and how artifacts in turn pre-present an organization’s future. Our study is based on an in-depth and longitudinal qualitative research design conducted in the field of haute cuisine and focuses on the ongoing development process of the menu as the central artifact.

References

  1. Bouty, Isabelle, and Marie-Léandre Gomez. 2010. Dishing Up Individual and Collective Dimensions in Organizational Knowing. Management Learning 41 (5): 545–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2013. Creativity in Haute Cuisine: Strategic Knowledge and Practice in Gourmet Kitchens. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology 11 (1): 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgelman, Robert A. 2002. Strategy as Vector and the Inertia of Coevolutionary Lock-In. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 325–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, Michael D., Roger Burkhart, Giovanni Dosi, Massimo Egidi, Luigi Marengo, Massimo Warglien, and Sidney Winter. 1996. Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organisations: Contemporary Research Issues. Industrial and Corporate Change 5: 653–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. D’Adderio, Luciana. 2008. The Performativity of Routines: Theorising the Influence of Artefacts and Distributed Agencies on Routines Dynamics. Research Policy 37 (5): 769–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2011. Artifacts at the Centre of Routines: Performing the Material Turn in Routines Theory. Journal of Institutional Economics 7 (2): 197–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D’Adderio, Luciana, and Neil Pollock. 2014. Performing Modularity: Competing Rules, Performative Struggles and the Effect of Organizational Theories on the Organization. Organization Studies 35 (12): 1813–1843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  9. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feldman, Martha S., Brian T. Pentland, Luciana D’Adderio, and Nathalie Lazaric. 2016. Beyond Routines as Things: Introduction to the Special Issue on Routine Dynamics. Organization Science 27 (3): 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harrington, Robert J., and Michael C. Ottenbacher. 2013. Managing the Culinary Innovation Process: The Case of New Product Development. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology 11 (1): 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koch, Jochen. 2011. Inscribed Strategies: Exploring the Organizational Nature of Strategic Lock-In. Organization Studies 32 (3): 337–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koch, Jochen, Hannes Krämer, Andreas Reckwitz, and Matthias Wenzel. 2016. Zum Umgang mit Zukunft in Organisationen – eine praxistheoretische Perspektive. Managementforschung 26: 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koch, Jochen, Matthias Wenzel, Ninja Natalie Senf, and Corinna Maibier. forthcoming. Organizational Creativity as an Attributional Process: The Case of Haute Cuisine. Organization Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. MacKenzie, Donald. 2003. An Equation and Its Worlds: Bricolage, Exemplars, Disunity and Performativity in Financial Economics. Social Studies of Science 33: 831–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2006. Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 28: 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, Joanne. 1992. Cultures in Organizations: Three Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Orlikowski, Wanda J. 1992. The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations. Organization Science 3 (3): 398–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ottenbacher, Michael, and Robert J. Harrington. 2006. The Culinary Innovation Process: A Study of Michelin-Starred Chefs. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology 5 (4): 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 2007. The Innovation Development Process of Michelin-Starred Chefs. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 19 (6/7): 444–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pentland, Brian T., and Martha S. Feldman. 2005. Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change 14 (5): 793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 2008. Designing Routines: On the Folly of Designing Artifacts, While Hoping for Patterns of Action. Information & Organization 18 (4): 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Perrow, Charles. 1973. Some Reflections on Technology and Organizational Analysis. In Modern Organizational Theory – Contextual, Environmental, and Socio-Cultural Variables, ed. A.R. Negandhi, 47–57. Kent: Kent State University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rafaeli, Anat, and Iris Vilnai-Yavetz. 2004. Emotion as a Connection of Physical Artifacts and Organizations. Organization Science 15 (6): 671–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schein, Edgar H. 1990. Organizational Culture. American Psychologist 45 (2): 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schultze, Ulrike, and Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2004. A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies. Information Systems Research 15 (1): 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott, Susan V., and Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2012. Reconfiguring Relations of Accountability: Materialization of Social Media in the Travel Sector. Accounting, Organizations & Society 37 (1): 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sydow, Jörg, Georg Schreyögg, and Jochen Koch. 2009. Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box. Academy of Management Review 34 (4): 689–709.Google Scholar
  31. Tsoukas, Haridimos, and Robert Chia. 2002. On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change. Organization Science 13 (5): 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vaara, Eero, Janne Tienari, Rebecca Piekkari, and Risto Säntti. 2005. Language and the Circuits of Power in a Merging Multinational Corporation. Journal of Management Studies 42 (3): 595–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Woodward, Joan. 1958. Management and Technology. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Yin, Robert K. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jochen Koch
    • 1
  • Ninja Natalie Senf
    • 1
  • Wasko Rothmann
    • 1
  1. 1.European University ViadrinaFrankfurt (Oder)Germany

Personalised recommendations