Advertisement

Managing the Digital Transformation: Preparing Cities for the Future

  • Markus Kowalski
  • Anja Danner-Schröder
  • Gordon Müller-Seitz
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines how organizations cope with and handle the temporal mode of the future in the light of digital transformation. Despite the importance of organizing for the future, we still lack an understanding of which processes and practices organizations use to manage the future. To this end, one of the most pervasive challenges in today’s organizational landscape is that of coping with the issues imposed by the ever-increasing need to face digitalization. Actors are able to reveal the practices and processes used to actually manage digital transformation, venturing beyond accounts that merely sketch the future as a digitalized, imagined state. We address this challenge through an explorative in-depth case study, observing how a set of innovation networks in Germany developed new city management concepts in a collaborative fashion to generate an intelligent and sustainable city of the future. Our analysis shows that innovation networks offer an at least partially generalizable account of how to engage different actors to collaborate on the challenges of the future. Building on these observations, we add to the extant literature on organizing for the future by (1) revealing practices and processes used to actually manage the digital transformation, and (2) providing a phase framework that offers an at least partially generalizable account of how to engage different actors to collaborate on the challenges of digitalization. Moreover, (3) our insights focus, at least indirectly, attention on cities as informative urban laboratories that engage with digitalization, offering an alternative setting to study when compared to the more usual settings of digitalization efforts, such as companies or crowds.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the members of the research network and particularly all those members who gave up their time to be available for an interview. We would also like to thank the editors of this book, Matthias Wenzel and Hannes Krämer, for their constructive feedback which helped in shaping the contribution of this chapter.

References

  1. Afuah, Allan, and Christopher I. Tucci. 2012. Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search. Academy of Management Review 37 (3): 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckert, Jens. 2016. Imagined Futures: Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berman, Saul J. 2012. Digital Transformation: Opportunities to Create New Business Models. Strategy and Leadership 40 (2): 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bharadwaj, Anandhi, Omar A. El Sawy, Paul A. Pavlou, and N. Venkatraman. 2013. Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights. MIS Quarterly 37 (2): 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2014. The Second Machine Age. Kulmbach: Plassen Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. Chesbrough, Henry W. 2003. Open Innovation. The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chesbrough, Henry W., and Melissa M. Appleyard. 2007. Open Innovation and Strategy. California Management Review 50 (1): 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooke, Philip. 2001. Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10 (4): 945–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahlander, Linus, and David M. Gann. 2010. How Open Is Innovation? Research Policy 39 (6): 699–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. David, Paul A. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review 75 (2): 332–337.Google Scholar
  11. Doz, Yves L., and Mikko Kosonen. 2007. Fast Strategy: How Strategic Agility Will Help You Stay Ahead of the Game. Pearson: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Feldman, Martha, and Wanda J. Orlikowski. 2011. Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory. Organization Science 22 (5): 1240–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitzgerald, Michael, Nina Kruschwitz, Didier Bonnet, and Michael Welch. 2014. Embracing Digital Technology: A New Strategic Imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review 55 (2): 1–12.Google Scholar
  15. Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Hayashi, Shuji. 1988. Culture and Management in Japan. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hernes, Tor. 2014. A Process Theory of Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hussenot, Anthony, and Stéphanie Missonier. 2016. Encompassing Stability and Novelty in Organization Studies: An Events-Based Approach. Organization Studies 37 (4): 523–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jacobs, Jane. 1985. Cities and the Wealth of Nations. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  20. Kirk, Jerome, and Marc L. Miller. 1986. Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koch, Jochen, Hannes Krämer, Andreas Reckwitz, and Matthias Wenzel. 2016. Zum Umgang mit Zukunft in Organisationen – eine praxistheoretische Perspektive. Managementforschung 26 (1): 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lange, Knut, Jörg Sydow, Gordon Müller-Seitz, and Arnold Windeler. 2013. Financing Innovations in Uncertain Networks – Roadmap Gap Filling in the Semiconductor Industry. Research Policy 42 (39): 647–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Langley, Ann. 2007. Process Thinking in Strategic Organization. Strategic Organization 5 (3): 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langley, Ann, Clive Smallman, Haridimos Tsoukas, and Andrew H. Van de Ven. 2013. Process Studies of Change in Organization and Management: Unveiling Temporality, Activity and Flow. Academy of Management Journal 56 (1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. March, James G. 1995. The Future, Disposable Organizations and the Rigidities of Imagination. Organization 2 (3/4): 427–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Müller-Seitz, Gordon, Mischa Seiter, and Patrick Wenz. 2016. Was ist eine Smart City? Wiesbaden: Gabler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neal, Zachary P. 2013. The Connected City: How Networks Are Shaping the Modern Metropolis. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Nonaka, Iikujiro. 1995. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science 5 (1): 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pohl, Christian. 2008. From Science to Policy Through Transdisciplinary Research. Environmental Science and Policy 11 (1): 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Simard, Caroline, and Joel West. 2008. Knowledge Networks and the Geographic Locus of Innovation. In Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm, ed. Henry W. Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West, 220–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sydow, Jörg, Elke Schüßler, and Gordon Müller-Seitz. 2016. Managing Interorganizational Relations – Debates and Cases. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  34. van de Ven, Andrew H., and Marshall S. Poole. 1990. Methods for Studying Innovation Development in the Minnesota Innovation Research Program. Organization Science 1 (3): 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vanhaverbeke, Wim, and Myriam Cloodt. 2006. Open Innovation in Value Networks. In Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm, edited by Henry W. Chesbrough, Wim Vanhaverbeke, and Joel West, 258–281. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. von Hippel, Eric. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Yin, Robert K. 2013. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Yoo, Youngjin. 2010. Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing. MIS Quarterly 34 (2): 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoo, Youngjin, R.J. Boland, K. Lyytinen, and A. Majchrzak. 2012. Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World. Organization Science 23 (5): 1398–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Kowalski
    • 1
  • Anja Danner-Schröder
    • 1
  • Gordon Müller-Seitz
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations