Advertisement

Philosophy of the Vascular Tree

  • Andreas Bikfalvi
Chapter

Abstract

A number of aspects stem from the study of vascular development that are suited to a historical and conceptual analysis and are at present poorly investigated. Such an analysis could show how this scientific domain has developed and what meaning research conducted in this field has for science in general and for the development of scientific ideas or methodologies. We have already discussed some of these issues, and they are revisited in this chapter. However, I give herein a more conceptual perspective and my personal view on the subject. I focus on selected issues, including the analysis of paradigm changes, conceptual categories, cross-fertilization of fields, technological advances and impact on angiogenesis, evolutionary considerations, molecular proximity of different systems, and methodological considerations.

References

  1. 338.
    Kuhn TS (1962) Historical structure of scientific discovery. Science 136(3518):760–764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 339.
    Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 340.
    Ayres P (2012) The life of Arthur Tansley. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. 341.
    Hinman VF, Davidson EH (2007) Evolutionary plasticity of developmental gene regulatory network architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(49):19404–19409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709994104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 342.
    Munoz-Chapuli R (2011) Evolution of angiogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 55(4-5):345–351. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.103212rmCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 343.
    Popper K (1935) Logik der Forschung. Julius Springer, Wien, ÖstereichCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 344.
    Benveniste J (1988) Benveniste on the Benveniste affair. Nature 335(6193):759. https://doi.org/10.1038/335759a0CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 345.
    Montagnier L, Del Giudice E, Aissa J, Lavallee C, Motschwiller S, Capolupo A, Polcari A, Romano P, Tedeschi A, Vitiello G (2015) Transduction of DNA information through water and electromagnetic waves. Electromag Biol Med 34(2):106–112. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2015.1036072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 346.
    Seralini GE, Clair E, Mesnage R, Gress S, Defarge N, Malatesta M, Hennequin D, de Vendomois JS (2012) Long term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food Chem Toxicol 50(11):4221–4231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 347.
    Pradeu T, Jaeger S, Vivier E (2013) The speed of change: towards a discontinuity theory of immunity? Nat Rev Immunol 13(10):764–769. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 348.
    Jain H, Jackson T (2017) Mathematical modeling of cellular cross-talk between endothelial and tumor cells highlights counterintuitive effects of VEGF-targeted therapies. Bull Math Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-017-0273-6
  12. 349.
    Grogan JA, Connor AJ, Markelc B, Muschel RJ, Maini PK, Byrne HM, Pitt-Francis JM (2017) Microvessel chaste: an open library for spatial modeling of vascularized tissues. Biophys J 112(9):1767–1772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.03.036CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Bikfalvi
    • 1
  1. 1.Angiogenesis and Tumor Microenvironment LaboratoryUniversity of Bordeaux and National Institute of Health and Medical ResearchPessacFrance

Personalised recommendations