Leadership and Firm Size: Evidence from an Empirical Relationship in Czech Companies

  • Mihaela Simionescu
  • Lucian-Liviu Albu
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relationship between leadership and the dimension of a company. The empirical study is based on data from 438 firms from the Czech Republic, the answers to questionnaires being provided by the managers of the firms. The results indicated significant differences in the managers’ opinions regarding the perception on leadership. Most of the managers in the sample considered professional knowledge as the most important feature of a successful leader. There are significant differences between managers regarding their opinion of the most important characteristic of a good leader. Almost half of the self-employed managers considered this characteristic as determinant for a good leader. Perseverance is considered the most important feature of a leader for most of the managers from microenterprise, small company, and medium-sized enterprise. Most of the managers of large companies indicated professional knowledge as determinant for a leader.

References

  1. Antonakis J (2017) The nature of leadership, 2nd edn. Sage publications, New York. 608 pGoogle Scholar
  2. Belas J, Bilan Y, Demjan V, Sipko J (2015) Entrepreneurship in SME segment: case study from the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Amfiteatru Econ 17(38):308–326Google Scholar
  3. Bolden R (2011) Distributed leadership in organizations: a review of theory and research. Int J Manag Rev 13:251–269. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00306.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolden R, Gosling J (2006) Leadership competencies: time to change the tune? Leadership 2(2):147–163. doi.org/10.1177/1742715006062932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolden R, Wood M, Gosling J (2006) Is the NHS leadership qualities framework missing the wood for the trees? In: OBHC (ed) Innovations in health care: a reality check. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  6. Buckingham M (2001) Don’t waste time and money, Gallup Management Journal, Dec 3, 2001Google Scholar
  7. Cashman K (2017) Leadership from the inside out: becoming a leader for life. Berrett-Koehler Publishers: Oakland.Google Scholar
  8. Ciulla JB (2014). Ethics, the heart of leadership. ABC-CLIO: California.Google Scholar
  9. Chvátalová I (2016) Social policy in the European Union. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 5(1):37–41.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2016.5.1.4 Google Scholar
  10. Conger J (1991) Inspiring others: the language of leadership. Acad Manag Exec 5(1):31–45Google Scholar
  11. Denis J-L, Langley A, Sergi V (2012) Leadership in the plural. Acad Manag Ann 6:211–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fairhurst G (2005) Reframing ‘the art of framing’: problems and prospects for leadership. Leadership 1(2):165–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fairhurst G, Sarr R (1996) The art of framing: managing the language of leadership. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. Gronn P (2009) Leadership configurations. Leadership 5:381–394. doi.org/10.1177/1742715009337770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hosťovecký M, Poláčik M (2016) Communication skills as the competitive advantage of sellers. Czech J Soc Sci Bus Econ 5(1):18–26.  https://doi.org/10.24984/cjssbe.2016.5.1.2 Google Scholar
  16. Hunt J, Laing B (1997) Leadership: the role of the exemplar. Bus Strateg Rev 8(1):31–42. doi.org/10.1111/1467-8616.00005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Janda K, Rausser G, Strielkowski W (2013) Determinants of profitability of polish rural micro-enterprises at the time of EU accession. East Eur Countryside 19:177–217.  https://doi.org/10.2478/eec-2013-0009 Google Scholar
  18. Johnson CE (2017) Meeting the ethical challenges of leadership: casting light or shadow. Sage Publications: California.Google Scholar
  19. Johnston MW, Marshall, GW (2016) Sales force management: leadership, innovation, technology. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  20. Komives SR, Wagner, WE (2016) Leadership for a better world: understanding the social change model of leadership development. Wiley: New Jersey.Google Scholar
  21. Kotter JP (1990) How leadership differs from management, vol 240. Free Press, New York, pp 59–68Google Scholar
  22. Koudelková P, Svobodová P (2014) Knowledge creation and sharing as essential determinants of SMEs innovation. Int Econ Lett 3(1):12–20.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2014.3.1.3 Google Scholar
  23. Kozubikova L, Belas J, Bilan Y, Bartos P (2015) Personal characteristics of entrepreneurs in the context of perception and management of business risk in the SME segment. Econ Soc 8(1):41–54Google Scholar
  24. Mailhot C, Gagnon S, Langley A, Binette LF (2016) Distributing leadership across people and objects in a collaborative research project. Leadership 12(1):53–85. doi.org/10.1177/1742715014543578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCall MW (1998) High fliers: developing the next generation of leaders. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  26. Miller L, Rankin N, Neathey F (2001) Competency frameworks in UK organizations. CIPD, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Moskalenko V, Yevsieieva I (2015) Effective leadership conflict management in food technology enterprises. Int Econ Lett 4(2):91–102.  https://doi.org/10.24984/iel.2015.4.4 Google Scholar
  28. Pearce CL, Conger JA (2003) Shared leadership: reframing the hows and whys of leadership. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  29. Pondy LR (1978) Leadership is a language game. In: McCall M, Lonbardo M (eds) Leadership: where else do we go? Duke University Press, Durham, pp 87–99Google Scholar
  30. Prince L (2016) Eating the menu rather than the dinner: Tao and leadership. Leadership 1(1):105–126Google Scholar
  31. Salaman G (2004) Competences of managers, competences of leaders. In: Storey J (ed) Leadership in organizations: current issues and key trends. Routledge, London, pp 58–78Google Scholar
  32. Simionescu M, Strielkowski W (2017) Brand loyalty and fashion marketing: a case study of Romanian youth. Mark Manag Innov 1(2017):25–31.  https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2017.1-0 Google Scholar
  33. Simionescu M, Albu LL, Szeles MR, Bilan Y (2017) The impact of biofuels utilisation in transport on the sustainable development in the European Union. Technol Econ Dev Econ 23(4):667–686.  https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2017.1323318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shapiro JP, Stefkovich JA (2016) Ethical leadership and decision making in education: applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  35. Shvedovsky V, Standrik A, Bilan Y (2016) Economic and social institutions: modelling the evolution paths for the archaic society. Econ Soc 9(2):137–147.  https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2016/9-2/9 Google Scholar
  36. Strielkowski W, Bilan Y (2016) Economics of electricity pricing and consumer protection. Econ Ann XXI 162(11–12):28–31.  https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V162-06 Google Scholar
  37. Varanavicius V, Navikaite A, Bilan Y, Strielkowski W (2017) Analysis of consumer behaviour in regional energy consumption. Ekon Regiona-Econ Region 13(1):147–156.  https://doi.org/10.17059/2017-1-14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wood M (2005) The fallacy of misplaced leadership. J Manag Stud 42(6):1101–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00535.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zaleznik A (1977) Managers and leaders: are they different. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262152664_Managers_and_Leaders_Are_They_Different. Accessed 12 Oct 2017

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mihaela Simionescu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lucian-Liviu Albu
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Economic Forecasting of the Romanian AcademyBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Centre for Migration Studies in Prague Business SchoolPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations