Sustainable Proteins? Values Related to Insects in Food Systems

  • Christian GamborgEmail author
  • Helena Röcklinsberg
  • Mickey Gjerris


Developing large scale production systems for farmed insects to supplement or replace feed and food ingredients from vertebrate livestock is often heralded as a more sustainable way to produce animal protein than currently used livestock production methods and is receiving increased interest from a diverse set of stakeholders ranging from political decision makers, environmental interest groups, farmers, industry and scientists. This is hardly a surprise, as sustainability has been widely embraced as a broad and inclusive political (ideological) as well as managerial (practical) framework. Ideally sustainability is a balance between a one-sided focus on productivity and profit on the one hand, and uncompromising demands for nature preservation and calls for radical changes in the agricultural production on the other. But there are different views on how to strike that balance – to some extent reflecting different values – which in turn gives rise to different challenges on how insects can contribute to food systems around the world.


  1. Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2016) Reducing the global environmental impact of livestock production: the minilivestock option. Journal of Cleaner Production 112:1754–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision, ESA working paper no. 12-03. Food and Agricultural Organization of The United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosselmann K (2016) The principle of sustainability: transforming law and governance. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Broom DM (2001) Evolution of pain. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift 70(1):17–21Google Scholar
  5. Broom DM (2014) Sentience and animal welfare. Centre for Agriculture and Biosciences International, OxfordshireCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eisemann CH, Jorgensen WK, Merritt DJ, Rice MJ, Cribb BW, Webb PD, Zalucki MP (1984) Do insects feel pain? A biological view. Cell Mol Life Sci 40(2):164–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elwood RW (2011) Pain and suffering in invertebrates? Inst Res Anim J 5(22):175–184Google Scholar
  8. FAO (2011) Mapping supply and demand for animal-source foods to 2030, by T.P. Robinson & F. Pozzi. Animal production and health working paper no. 2. Rome.
  9. FAO (2015a) Insects for food and feed.
  10. FAO (2015b) The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2015. Rome: Scholar
  11. FAO (2013) The contribution of insects to food security, livelihoods and the environment. Rome: FAOGoogle Scholar
  12. Gahukar RT (2011) Entomophagy and human food security. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 31(3):129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gamborg C, Gjerris M (2012) For the benefit of the land? Ethical aspects of the impact of meat production on nature, the environment, and the countryside. In: Potthas T, Meisch S (eds) Climate change and sustainable development. Ethical perspectives on land use and food production. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, pp 202–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gamborg C, Sandøe P (2005) Sustainability in farm animal breeding: a review. Livest Prod Sci 92:221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gamborg C, Larsen JB (2005) Towards more sustainable forestry? The ethics of close-to-nature forestry. Silva Carelica 49:55–64Google Scholar
  16. Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock – a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. Gjerris M, Gamborg C, Röcklinsberg H (2016) Ethical aspects of insect production for food and feed. J Insects Food Feed 2(2):101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodland R, Anhang J (2009) Livestock and climate change. What if the key actors in climate change are… cows, pigs, and chickens. World Watch Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Halloran A, Roos N, Eilenberg J, Cerutti A, Bruun S (2016) Life cycle analysis of edible insects for food protein: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halloran A, Vantomme P, Hanboonsong Y, Ekesi S (2015) Regulating edible insects: the challenge of addressing food security, nature conservation, and the erosion of traditional food culture. Food Secur 7(3):739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halloran A, Hanboonsong Y, Roos N, Bruun S (2017) Life cycle assessment of cricket farming in north-eastern Thailand. J Clean Prod 156:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardouin J (1995) Minilivestock: from gathering to controlled production. Biodiversity and Conservation 4:220–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hartmann C, Shi J, Giusto A and Siegrist M (2015) The psychology of eating insects: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China. Food Quality and Preference 44:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hekler EB, Gardner CD and Robinson TN (2010) Effects of a College Course About Food and Society on Students’ Eating Behaviors. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 38(5): 543–547CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Henry M, Gasco L, Piccolo G, Fountulaki E (2015) Review on the use of insects in the diet of farmed fish: past and future. Anim Feed Sci Technol 203:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. House J (2016) Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the Netherlands: Academic and commercial implications. Appetite 107:47–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ilea RC (2009) Intensive livestock farming: global trends, increased environmental concerns, and ethical solutions. J Agric Environ Ethics 22:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jongema Y (2015) List of edible insects of the world (June 1, 2015). Waageningen UR. Accessed 17.01.17
  29. Kanerva, M (2016) Meat eating as a practice and the acceptance of radical change. In Olsson, I.A.S., Araújo, S.M. and Vieira, M.F. (eds.) Food futures: Ethics, science and culture. Proceedings of the EurSafe 2016 conference in Porto, Portugal 29 September – 1 October. Wageningen Academic PublishersGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindström N (2012) Förhållandet mellan praxis och teori inom etiken, Lund Studies in Ethics and Theology 16Google Scholar
  31. Makkar HPS, Tran G, Heuzé V, Ankers P (2014) State-of-the-art on use of insects as animal feed. Anim Feed Sci Technol 197:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maxey L (2007) From “alternative” to “sustainable food”, in Maye D, Holloway L and Kneafsey M (eds.): Alternative food geographies. London: Elsevier, pp. 55–75Google Scholar
  33. Miech P, Berggren Å, Lindberg JE, Chhay T, Khieu B, Jansson A (2016) Growth and survival of reared Cambodian field crickets (Teleogryllus testaceus) fed weeds, agricultural and food industry by-products. J Insects Food Feed 2(4):285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nel WP, Ward JD (2015) Towards a rational sustainability framework. Sustain Sci 10(3):515–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norris K, Potts SG, Mortimer SR (2010) Ecosystem services and food production. Issues Environ Sci Technol 30:52–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ong ASJ, Frewer LJ and Chan M (2017) Cognitive dissonance in food and nutrition – A conceptual framework. Trends in Food Science & Technology 59:60–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oonincx DGAB, van Itterbeeck J, Heetkamp MJW, van den Brand H, van Loon JJ, van Huis A (2010) An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production by insect species suitable for animal or human consumption. PLoS One 5(12):e14445. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Röös E, Patel M, Spångberg J, Carlsson G, Rydhmer L (2016) Limiting livestock production to pasture and by-products in a search for sustainable diets. Food Policy 58:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sala S, Assumpcio’ A, McLaren SJ, Notarnicola B, Saouter E, Sonesson U (2017) In quest of reducing the environmental impacts of food production and consumption. J Clean Prod 140:387–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sherwin C (2001) Can invertebrates suffer? Or how robust is argument-by-analogy. Animal Welfare 10:103–18Google Scholar
  41. Smetana S, Mathys A, Knoch A, Heinz V (2015) Meat alternatives: life cycle assessment of most known meat substitutes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20(9):1254–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith JA (1991) A question of pain in invertebrates. Inst Lab Anim Res J 33:25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sneddon LU, Elwood RW, Adamo SA, Leach MC (2014) Defining and assessing animal pain. Anim Behav 97:201–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Söderbaum P (2014) The Role of Economics and Democracy in Institutional Change for Sustainability. Sustainability 6(5):2755–2765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow – environmental issues and options. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  46. Steinfeld H, Mooney HA, Schneider F, Neville LE (eds) (2013) Livestock in a changing landscape. Volume 1: Drivers, consequences, and responses. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  47. The Lancet (2013) Executive summary of the lancet maternal and child nutrition series. The Lancet.
  48. United Nations (2015) The sustainable development agenda. The United Nations.
  49. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2015) World population prospects: the 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables, Working paper no. ESA/P/WP.241. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. van Huis A (2013) Potential of insects as food and feed in assuring food security. Annu Rev Entomol 58:563–583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. van Huis A, van Itterbeeck J, Klunder H, Mertens E, Halloran A, Muir G, Vantomme P (2013) Edible insects: future prospects for food and feed security, FAO forestry paper 171. Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  52. Verbeke W (2015) Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Quality and Preference 39:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wheeler T, von Braun J (2013) Climate change impacts on global food security. Science 341(6145):508–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Gamborg
    • 1
    Email author
  • Helena Röcklinsberg
    • 2
  • Mickey Gjerris
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food and Resource EconomicsUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Animal Environment and HealthSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations