A ‘Miracle Bed’ and a ‘Second Heart’: Technology and Users of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the Context of Medical Diversity in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan

  • Danuta Penkala-Gawęcka
Part of the Health, Technology and Society book series (HTE)


In this chapter, I examine the changing role and place of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan, in the context of medical diversity which is particularly prevalent in the capital, Bishkek. The focus is on technological inventions from South Korea, popular among users of CAM therapies in Bishkek, specifically the Nuga Best (NB) bed-massager and other devices offered by the Nuga Medical Company. In the analysis, I apply Latour’s Actor-Network Theory (ANT), understood as a method for tracing processes of networking, stabilising and destabilising networks, in this case the NB network in Bishkek. In accordance with this method, I follow the network’s actors and demonstrate the role of the ‘miracle bed’ as a powerful non-human actor that has a special appeal to the people, significantly influencing their attitudes and strongly contributing to the network’s durability.


  1. Andersen, R. S., & Risør, M. B. (2014). The importance of contextualization. Anthropological reflections on descriptive analysis, its limitations and implications. Anthropology & Medicine, 21(3), 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cressman, D. (2009). A brief overview of Actor-Network Theory: Punctualization, heterogeneous engineering & translation. Paper for Simon Frasier University ACT Lab/Centre for Policy Research on Science & Technology (CPROST), pp. 1–17. Retrieved November 11, 2017, from
  3. Dilger, H., & Hadolt, B. (2015). ‘Medicine in context’. An epistemological trajectory. Medicine Anthropology Theory, 2(3), 128–153.Google Scholar
  4. Ferzacca, S. (2002). Governing bodies in new order Indonesia. In M. Lock & M. Nichter (Eds.), Horizons in medical anthropology: Essays in honour of Charles Leslie (pp. 35–57). London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Field, M. G. (2002). The Soviet legacy: The past as a prologue. In M. McKee, J. Healy, & J. Falkingham (Eds.), Health care in Central Asia (pp. 67–75). Buckingham: WHO, Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Hardon, A., & Moyer, E. (2014). Medical technologies: Flows, frictions and new socialities. Anthropology & Medicine, 21(2), 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hohmann, S. (2010). National identity and invented tradition: The rehabilitation of traditional medicine in post-Soviet Uzbekistan. The China and Eurasia Quarterly Forum, 8(3), 129–148.Google Scholar
  8. Hörbst, V., & Wolf, A. (2014). ARVs and ARTs: Medicoscapes and the unequal place-making for biomedical treatments in sub-Saharan Africa. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 28(2), 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hsu, E. (2008). Medical pluralism. In K. Heggenhougen & S. Quah (Eds.), International encyclopedia of public health (Vol. 4, pp. 316–321). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ibraimova, A., Akkazieva, B., Ibraimov, A., Manzhieva, E., & Rechel, B. (2011). Kyrgyzstan: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 13(3), 1–152.Google Scholar
  11. Johannessen, H. (2006). Introduction: Body and self in medical pluralism. In H. Johannessen & I. Lázár (Eds.), Multiple medical realities: Patients and healers in biomedical, alternative and traditional medicine (pp. 1–17). New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson, E. J. (2009) Authoritarian regimes and non-governmental organizations: Transitions in health care provision in Central Asia. PhD diss. Ann Arbor: ProQuest.Google Scholar
  13. Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47(4), 369–381.Google Scholar
  14. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Law, J. (2007). Actor network theory and material semiotics (version of 25th April 2007). Retrieved March 6, 2016, from
  16. Leslie, C. M. (Ed.). (1976). Asian medical systems. A comparative study. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lindquist, G. (2001). The culture of charisma: Wielding legitimacy in contemporary Russian healing. Anthropology Today, 17(2), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lindquist, G. (2006). Conjuring hope: Magic and healing in contemporary Russia. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  19. Lock, M. (2004). Biomedical technologies: Anthropological approaches. In C. R. Ember & M. Ember (Eds.), Encyclopedia of medical anthropology: Health and illness in the world’s cultures topics (Vol. 1, pp. 109–116). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Lock, M. (2007). Medical anthropology: Intimations for the future. In F. Saillant & S. Genest (Eds.), Medical anthropology: Regional perspectives and shared concerns (pp. 267–288). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Lock, M., & Nichter, M. (2002). From documenting medical pluralism to critical interpretations of globalized health knowledge, policies, and practices. In M. Lock & M. Nichter (Eds.), Horizons in medical anthropology: Essays in honour of Charles Leslie (pp. 1–34). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Naraindas, H., Quack, J., & Sax, W. S. (Eds.). (2014). Asymmetrical conversations: Contestations, circumventions, and the blurring of therapeutic boundaries. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  23. Nichiporova, N. (2011). Traditsii v eksperimente. Vecherniy Bishkek, December 20. Retrieved April 24, 2017, from
  24. Parkin, D. (2013). Medical crises and therapeutic talk. Anthropology & Medicine, 20(2), 124–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Penkala-Gawęcka, D. (2002). Korean medicine in Kazakhstan: Ideas, practices and patients. Anthropology & Medicine, 9(3), 315–336.Google Scholar
  26. Penkala-Gawęcka, D. (2016). Risky encounters with doctors? Medical diversity and health-related strategies of the inhabitants of Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. Anthropology & Medicine, 23(2), 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Penkala-Gawęcka, D. (2017a). Legitimacy and authority of complementary medicine practitioners in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan. The role and use of tradition. Rocznik Orientalistyczny, 70(1), 20–32.Google Scholar
  28. Penkala-Gawęcka, D. (2017b). Perceptions of health and illness, and the role of healers in Kyrgyzstan. Public Health Panorama, 3(1), 80–87.Google Scholar
  29. Penkala-Gawęcka, D., & Rajtar, M. (2016). Introduction to the special issue “medical pluralism and beyond”. Anthropology & Medicine, 23(2), 129–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Danuta Penkala-Gawęcka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ethnology and Cultural AnthropologyAdam Mickiewicz UniversityPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations