Advertisement

Manning Up: Justin Trudeau and the Politics of the Canadian Defence Community

  • Andrea Lane
Chapter
Part of the Canada and International Affairs book series (CIAF)

Abstract

This chapter offers a feminist analysis of both the nature of the Canadian defence community and its expertise in general, and the manner in which that community discusses the defence policy of Liberal governments in particular. Instead of embarking on a broad assessment of Trudeau’s defence policies directly, the chapter explores the way in which all such assessments, with their assumptions of neutrality and objectivity, should be viewed with suspicion due to both the “unrepresentative author” bias inherent to much Canadian defence commentary and the gendered manner in which Liberal francophone politicians are discussed in Canada. Two defence policy case studies—the fighter replacement programme and a United Nations (UN) peacekeeping mission—are discussed as high-profile examples of the politics of defence in Canada. Finally, there is an examination of the government’s 2017 defence policy statement, with a focus on the way in which sex and gender are at play not only in the policy itself but also in its critical reception and political impact.

References

  1. Akin, David. 2017. Trudeau’s celebrity can actually help us. Toronto Sun, March 7.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Bruce, and David Coletto. 2014. Harper, Mulcair, Trudeau – Overall impressions. Abacus Data, August 29. http://abacusdata.ca/harper-mulcair-trudeau-impressions/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  3. Bercuson, David. 2015. Canada deserves better answers about the ISIS mission. Globe and Mail, December 18.Google Scholar
  4. Bezglasnyy, Anton, and Douglas Alan Ross. 2011. Strategically superfluous, unacceptably overpriced: The case against Canada’s F-35A lightning II acquisition. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 17 (3): 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bland, Douglas. 2016. Trudeau cannot continue the neglect of the Canadian military. Ottawa Citizen, November 18, 2016.Google Scholar
  6. Boswell, Christina. 2008. The political functions of expert knowledge: Knowledge and legitimation in European Union immigration policy. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (4): 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boucher, Jean-Christophe. 2010. Evaluating the ‘Trenton effect’: Canadian public opinion and military casualties in Afghanistan (2006–2010). American Review of Canadian Studies 40 (2): 237–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boucher, Jean-Christophe, and Stéphane Roussel. 2008. From Afghanistan to ‘Quebecistan’: Quebec as the Pharmakon in Canadian foreign and defence policy. In Canada among Nations 2007: What room for manoeuvre? ed. Jean Daudelin and Daniel Schwanen, 128–158. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal. 2011. Canada and the F-35: What’s at stake. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal 17 (3): 193–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canadian Press. 2017. Liberals take next step on Super Hornet fighter jet deal. Global News, March 14. http://globalnews.ca/news/3308918/liberals-super-hornet-fighter-jets/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  11. Collins, Jeffrey, and Sean Speer. 2017. First principles and the National Interest: Recommendations for a new Canadian defence policy. Macdonald Laurier Institute, March 2017. http://macdonaldlaurier.ca/files/pdf/MLI_NationalInterestDefenceF_Web.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
  12. Crosby, Ann Denholm. 2003. Myths of Canada’s human security pursuits: Tales of tool boxes, toy chests, and tickle trunks. In Feminist perspectives on Canadian foreign policy, ed. Claire Turenne Sjolander, Heather A. Smith, and Deborah Stienstra, 90–107. Don Mills: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cudmore, James. 2014. Sea King replacements: $7.6B Cyclone maritime helicopters lack key safety requirement. CBC News, June 23. http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/sea-king-replacements-7-6b-cyclone-maritime-helicopters-lack-key-safety-requirement-1.2684036. Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
  14. Eichenberg, Richard. 2003. Gender differences in public attitudes towards the use of force by the United States, 1990–2003. International Security 28 (1): 110–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eichenberg, Rchard, and Richard Stoll. 2011. Gender difference or parallel publics? The dynamics of defense spending opinions in the United States, 1965–2007. Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (2): 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. English, John. 2009. Just watch me: The life of Pierre Elliot Trudeau: 1968–2000. Toronto: Knopf.Google Scholar
  17. Fitzsimmons, Scott, Alan Craigie, and Marc Andre Bodet. 2014. Canadian public opinion about the military: Assessing the influences on attitudes towards defence spending and participation in overseas combat missions. Canadian Journal of Political Science 47 (3): 503–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foroohar, Kambiz. 2017. UN peacekeepers face new peril in Trump’s push to cut budget. Bloomberg, March 22. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-03-22/un-s-peacekeepers-face new-peril-in-trump-s-push-to-cut-budget. Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
  19. Granatstein, J.L., and Robert Bothwell. 1991. Pirouette: Pierre Trudeau and Canadian foreign policy. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gravelle, Thomas, Thomas Scotto, Jason Reifler, and Howard Clarke. 2010. Foreign policy belief and support for Stephen Harper and the conservative party. Canadian Foreign Policy 20 (2): 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grazier, Dan. 2017. F-35 continues to stumble. Project on Government oversight, March 20. http://www.pogo.org/straus/issues/weapons/2017/f35-continues-to-stumble.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  22. Gutterman, Ellen, and Andrea Lane. 2017. Beyond LAVs: Corruption, commercialization and the Canadian defence industry. Canadian Foreign Policy 23 (1): 77–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haglund, David, and Justin Massie. 2016. Southern (over) exposure? Quebec and the evolution of Canada’s grand strategy, 2002–2012. American Review of Canadian Studies 46 (2): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ivison, John. 2017. Liberal defence plan puts national interest ahead of its own partisan concerns, for now. National Post, June 7.Google Scholar
  25. Kay, Jonathan. 2012. How the tragedy of 9/11 made Canada a better, more sensible country. National Post, September 11.Google Scholar
  26. Keeble, Edna. 1997. Rethinking the 1971 white paper and Trudeau’s impact on Canadian defense policy. American Review of Canadian Studies 27 (4): 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kennedy, Mark. 2015. Stephen Harper: The political outsider who sought a revolution. Ottawa Citizen, October 20.Google Scholar
  28. Lagassé, Philippe, and Paul Robinson. 2008. Reviving realism in the Canadian defence debate. Kingston: Queen’s Centre for International Relations.Google Scholar
  29. Lawless, Jennifer. 2004. Women, war, and winning elections: Gender stereotyping in the post-9/11 era. Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 479–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leuprecht, Christian, and Joel Sokolsky. 2015. Defence Walmart style. Armed Forces and Society 41 (3): 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liberal Party of Canada. 2015a. Promoting international peace and security. Liberal Party of Canada. https://www.liberal.ca/realchange/promoting-international-peace-and-security/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  32. ———. 2015b. F-35. Liberal Party of Canada. https://www.liberal.ca/realchange/f-35/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  33. Maloney, Sean. 2016. Towards a new national security policy for Canada. Defense and Security Analysis 32 (2): 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Massie, Justin, Jean-Christophe Boucher, and Stéphane Roussel. 2010. Hijacking a policy? Assessing Quebec’s “undue” influence on Canada’s Afghan policy. American Review of Canadian Studies 40 (2): 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCormick, Ty, and Colum Lynch. 2017. To save peacekeeping from Trump’s budget axe, will the UN embrace fighting terrorism? Foreign Policy, March 29.Google Scholar
  36. National Defence. 2017. Strong, secure, engaged: Canada’s defence policy. National Defence. http://dgpaapp.forces.gc.ca/en/canada-defence-policy/docs/canada-defence-policy-report.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  37. Nossal, Kim Richard. 2016. Charlie foxtrot: Fixing defence procurement in Canada. Toronto: Dundurn.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2016b. Canada is back, part 2: Trudeau and the use of force. CDA Institute, January 28. http://cdainstitute.ca/canada-is-back-part-2-trudeau-and-the-use-of-force/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  39. Nossal, Kim Richard, Stéphane Roussel, and Stéphane Paquin. 2015. The politics of Canadian foreign policy. Montreal/Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pugliese, Daivd. 2007. Trudeau was Canada’s top defence spender: Study. National Post, December 3.Google Scholar
  41. Richter, Andrew. 2016. The Liberal government of Justin Trudeau and defence policy. CDA Institute, November. http://cdainstitute.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Richter_Analysis_November_2016.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
  42. ———. 2017. A muscular new Canada? Not so fast. Macdonald-Laurier Institute, July 31. http://www.macdonaldlaurier.ca/a-muscular-new-canada-not-so-fast-andrew-richter-for-inside-policy/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  43. Rideau Institute. 2017. New Canadian defence policy neither credible nor affordable. Rideau Institute, June 12. http://www.rideauinstitute.ca/2017/06/12/new-canadian-defence-policy-neither-credible-nor-affordable/. Accessed 23 Aug 2017.
  44. Sabin, Jerald. 2016. Are you man enough? Masculinity in the 105 election. Policy Options, May 26. http://policyoptions.irpp.org/2016/05/26/man-enough-masculinity-2015-federal-election/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  45. Sabin, Jerald, and Kyle Kirkup. 2016. Competing masculinities and political campaigns. Paper presented at the 2016 Annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  46. Saideman, Steven. 2014. On Harper’s strategy and Trudeau’s quandary. Open Canada, October 6. https://www.opencanada.org/features/on-harpers-strategy-and-trudeaus-quandary/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  47. Schaub, Jr., Gary, and Richard Shimooka. 2017. Super Hornets, eh? Canadian airpower falls short on North American defense. War on the Rocks, February 17. https://warontherocks.com/2017/02/super-hornets-eh-canadian-airpower-falls-short-on-north-american-defense/. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.
  48. Shadwick, Martin. 2004. The Chretien legacy. Canadian Military Journal 4 (4): 68–72.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2011. Defence and the 2011 election. Canadian Military Journal 11 (4): 62–67.Google Scholar
  50. Simpson, Jeffrey. 2016. Why Sajjan will be wrestling with military spending. Globe and Mail, January 16.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, Heather. 2003. Disrupting internationalism and finding the others. In Feminist perspectives on Canadian foreign policy, ed. Claire Turenne Sjolander, Heather Smith, and Deborah Stienstra, 24–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sokolsky, Joel, and Joseph Jockel. 2016. A defence policy review? Not really necessary. CDA Institute, April, 2017. http://cdainstitute.ca/wp-content/uploads/Analysis/Sokolsky_Jockel_Analysis_April_2016.pdf. Accessed 27 Aug 2017.
  53. Solomon, Binyam. 2005. The demand for Canadian defence expenditures. Defence and Peace Economics 16 (3): 171–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tandt, Michael den. 2015. Isis war needs military might, not pacifism. London (Ontario) Free Press, November 17.Google Scholar
  55. Tickner, J. Ann. 2006. Feminism meets international relations: Some methodological issues. In Feminist methodologies for international relations, ed. Brooke A. Ackerly, Maria Stern, and Jacqui True, 19–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Hlatky, Stéphanie von. 2016. Trudeau’s Promises: From coalition operations to peacekeeping and beyond. CDA Institute, June. http://cdainstitute.ca/wp-content/uploads/Analysis/images_Analysis_Hlatky_Analysis_June_2016.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
  57. Hlatky, Stéphanie von., and Kim Richard Nossal. 2017. Canada’s new defence policy: The short version. CDA Institute, July. http://cdainstitute.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/CDA-Institute-Analysis-vonHlatkyNossal-July-2017FINAL.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2017.
  58. Vucetic, Srdjan. 2011. The Anglosphere: A genealogy of a racialized identity in international relations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Winter, Nicholas. 2010. Masculine republicans and feminine democrats: Gender and Americans’ explicit and implicit images of the political parties. Political Behavior 32 (4): 587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Lane
    • 1
  1. 1.Dalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations