Advertisement

Digital Echoes pp 213-230 | Cite as

Mediating and Visualizing Paxton’s Material for the Spine

  • Rebecca Stancliffe
Chapter

Abstract

Through a close reading of Material for the Spine (Paxton 2008) Stancliffe examines how the artistic and movement philosophies of American choreographer Steve Paxton (1939–) are successfully digitally mediated in a way that is not possible through traditional systems of documentation such as movement notation. This chapter examines how the creative and analytic affordances of video annotation and animation illuminate ‘hidden’ facets of movement not immediately accessible in video alone, namely the imagined spatial and sensorial experience particular to Paxton’s practice. Material for the Spine is important to acknowledge in the discussion of cultural heritage as it sets a precedent for augmenting video to articulate and reveal the inner structures of movement and experience which is then transmitted through media objects.

References

  1. Albright, Ann Cooper. 1989. Writing the Moving Body: Nancy Stark Smith and the Hieroglyphs. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 10 (3): 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrien, Baptiste. 2015. Contredanse. Keynote presented at the 20th/21st Century Performer Training Working Group: Remediated Training, University of Leeds, 13 May.Google Scholar
  3. Andrien, Baptise, Corin Florence, and Scott deLahunta. 2015. Choreographic Objects: Contredanse and the Publication of Dance Ideas. Curated session presented at the Conference for Dance and Somatic Practices, Coventry University, 11 July.Google Scholar
  4. Contact Quarterly. 2014. About Contact Improvisation. Accessed 2 October 2015. http://www.contactquarterly.com/contact-improvisation/about/.
  5. Forsythe, William. 1999. Improvisational Technologies: A Tool for the Analytic Dance Eye. Karlsruhe: ZKM Zentrum for Kunst and Medietechnologie. CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  6. Forsythe, William, and Ohio State University. 2009. Synchronous Objects for One Flat Thing, Reproduced. Accessed 5 January 2015.http://synchronousobjects.osu.edu.
  7. Hay, Deborah, and Motion Bank. 2013. Using the Sky. Accessed 26 February 2018. http://scores.motionbank.org/dh/#/set/sets.
  8. Morrissey, Charlie. 2011.Spinal Trialogue: Charlie Morrissey, Steve Paxton, Scott Smith Email Dialogue. Accessed 30 September 2015. http://www.charliemorrissey.com/writing/spinal-trialogue-charlie-morrissey-steve-paxton-scott-smith-email-dialogue/.
  9. Novack, Cynthia J. 1988. Contact Improvisation: A Photo Essay and Summary Movement Analysis. TDR 32 (4): 120–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Paxton, Steve. 1975. Contact Improvisation. The Drama Review 19 (1): 40–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 1987. Improvisation Is…. Contact Quarterly 12 (2): 15–19.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2003. Drafting Interior Techniques. In Taken by Surprise: A Dance Improvisation Reader, ed. Ann Cooper Albright and David Gere, 175–183. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2008. Material for the Spine: A Movement Study. Brussels: Contredanse. DVD-ROM.Google Scholar
  14. Preston-Dunlop, Valerie. 1981. The Nature of the Embodiment of Choreutic Units in Contemporary Choreography. PhD Diss., The Laban Centre for Movement and Dance.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1998. Looking at Dances: A Choreological Perspective on Choreography. London: Verve Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Walker Art Center. 2015. Steve Paxton Talking Dance. Accessed 16 October 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_82Od5NM4LI.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca Stancliffe
    • 1
  1. 1.Coventry UniversityCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations