“Ready To Beam Up”: Star Trek and its Interactions with Science, Research and Technology

  • Joachim AllgaierEmail author


Star Trek has been popular not only with various international audiences; in fact, it has become a sort of icon of popular culture. Its imagery, style and ideas have inspired and motivated many scientists, researchers and inventors. There have been numerous interesting and fruitful interactions between the real world of science and research and Star Trek’s fictional world. This contribution investigates how various researchers, scientists and research institutions have referred to Star Trek in their work and how ideas and particular aspects and technologies of the Star Trek universe have been used in public science communication. Star Trek technology was also used as reference point to ignite innovation. For instance, in early 2017, the Qualcomm Tricorder XPrize competition awarded more than $10 million in prizes to teams that attempted to make real-world, non-invasive, diagnostic devices inspired by the Star Trek tricorder. The chapter also explains how NASA teamed up with some of the actors from Star Trek in order to engage with various audiences, and even to recruit young astronauts. Star Trek provides many opportunities to study the interactions between science, research and popular culture.


Science communication Popular culture Science and society Science to public Science fiction Innovation Science and technology studies Star Trek 

Works Cited

  1. 1.
    Heisenberg compensator. Memory Alpha. Retrieved from
  2. 2.
    Johnson S (1987) Mr. Scott’s guide to the enterprise. Pocket Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sternbach R, Okuda M (1991) Star Trek: the next generation: technical manual. Pocket Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chaires RH, Chilton B (eds) (2003) Star Trek visions of law and justice. Adios Press, DallasGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gonzalez GA (2015) The politics of Star Trek: justice, war, and the future. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stoppe S (2014) Unterwegs zu neuen Welten: Star Trek als politische Utopie. Büchner Verlag, DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barad J, Robertson E (2000) The ethics of Star Trek. Harper, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chyka PA, Chyka P, Banner W (1999) The history of poisoning in the future. Lessons from Star Trek. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 37(6):793–799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brandon J (2015) 12 Star Trek gadgets that now exist. In: Mental floss. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foresman C (2010) How Star Trek artists imagined the iPad… nearly 30 years ago. In: Ars Technica. Retrieved from Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krauss LM (1997) Beyond Star Trek: physics from alien invasions to the end of time. Basic Books, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krauss LM (2007) The physics of Star Trek. Basic Books, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jenkins H (1988) Star Trek rerun, reread, rewritten. Fan writing as textual poaching. Crit Stud Mass Commun 5(2):85–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tulloch J, Jenkins H (1995) Science fiction audiences: watching Doctor Who and Star Trek. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jindra M (1994) Star Trek fandom as a religious phenomenon. Sociology of Religion 55(1):27–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anderegg D (2011) Nerds: how dorks, dweebs, techies, and Trekkies can save America and why they might be our last hope. TarcherPerigee, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bouwmeester D, Pan J-W, Mattle K, Eibl M, Weinfurter H, Zeilinger A (1997) Experimental quantum teleportation. Nature 390:575–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zeilinger A (2010) Dance of the photons: from Einstein to quantum teleportation. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zeilinger A (2000) Quantum teleportation. Scientific American, April 2000, pp 50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    The National Centre for Research and Development (2014) Like in Star Trek. Innovations for progress. Retrieved from
  21. 21.
    Sloane P (n.d.) How Star Trek inspired an innovation – your cell phone. Destination Innovation.
  22. 22.
    Rennie J (2011) 3D printing and the replicator economy. Txchnologist.
  23. 23.
    Wimberly T (2011) Google’s response to Siri is codenamed Majel, could be released by end of year. Android and me. Retrieved from
  24. 24.
    Brachmann S (2016) Transparent aluminum: the latest Star Trek fictional tech to become reality. IPWatchdog.
  25. 25.
    General Electric (2013). 10 “Star Trek” technologies that actually exist. Mashable. Retrieved from
  26. 26.
    BBC News (2011). Leicester Royal Infirmary to open “Star Trek sick bay”. BBC News. Retrieved from
  27. 27.
    XPrize Foundation (2017) Qualcomm Tricorder XPrize. Retrieved from
  28. 28.
    Smillie C (2012) Mr. Spock: my favourite scientist. YouTube. Retrieved from
  29. 29.
    Wei W (2014) Neil deGrasse Tyson tells us why “Star Trek” is so much better than “Star Wars”. Business Insider. Retrieved from
  30. 30.
    O’Keeffe M (2010) Uhura’s Legacy: media images and diversity in STEM careers. Visual Inquiry. Retrieved from
  31. 31.
    Nichols N (1994) Beyond Uhura: Star Trek and other memories. G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Penley C (1997) NASA/Star Trek. Verso, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    O’Keeffe M (2010) Media and the making of scientists. PhD Thesis. University of PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vaughan D (1997) The challenger launch decision: risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    CNN Edition (2005) Then and now: Dr. Mae Jemison. CNN Edition. Retrieved from
  36. 36.
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2016) Happy 50th Anniversary Star Trek. YouTube. Retrieved from
  37. 37.
    Echevarria R (Writer), Burton L (Director) (1993) Second chances [Television series episode]. In: Berman R (Executive Producer) Star Trek: the next generation. Columbia Broadcasting System, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2005) Final frontier astronauts land on Star Trek. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Retrieved from
  39. 39.
    Moore RD (Writer), Singer A (Director) (1993) Descent [Television series episode]. In: Berman R (Executive Producer) Star Trek: the next generation. Columbia Broadcasting System, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Star Trek Tributes. Memory Alpha. Retrieved from
  41. 41.
    Okrand M (1985) The Klingon dictionary. Pocket Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Frayling C (2005) Mad, bad and dangerous? The scientist and the cinema. Reaktion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Batchelor DA (2016) The science of Star Trek. NASA Retrieved from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Science, Technology and Society StudiesAlpen-Adria-Universität KlagenfurtKlagenfurtAustria

Personalised recommendations