Preoperative embolization is complementary to surgery for large brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). From January 2005 to December 2015, 69 patients harboring an AVM were managed in our department by the same surgeon (RG). Forty one were ruptured and 65 were supratentorial. Thirty nine smaller AVMs were treated with surgery stand-alone, whereas, for 30 larger malformations, surgery was combined with adjuvant treatment involving preoperative staged embolization and/or, less frequently, radiosurgery. In all patients treated with surgery alone, complete resection of AVM was achieved. A successful preoperative partial endovascular obliteration of AVM was obtained in 24 out of 27 more complex cases, with a zero mortality rate and a very low morbidity. Here, embolization was of a certain utility in the handling of deeper feeders and nidus excision, also facilitating intraoperative hemostasis. In three cases of residuals, radiosurgery was performed. In those patient treated with a combined approach, a good overall outcome, 0–2 modified Rankin Scale (mRS), was achieved in 25 cases. Preoperative embolization proved to be a reasonable option complementary to high-grade AVMs surgery, reducing the frequency of breakthrough hemorrhages, aiding the elimination of deep feeders, and making the nidus dissection easier.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Ellis JA, Lavine SD. Role of embolization for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. MDCVJ. 2014;10(4):234–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Natarajan SK, Ghodke B, Britz GW, Born DE, Sekhar LN. Multimodality treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations with microsurgery after embolization with Onyx: single-center experience and technical nuances. Neurosurgery. 2008;62:1213–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto N, Nozaki K, Takagi Y. Surgery of cerebral arteriovenousmalformation. Neurosurgery. 2007;61:375–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyamoto S, Hashimoto N, Nagata I. Posttreatment sequelae of palliatively treated cerebral arteriovenousmalformations. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:589–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spezler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1986;65:476–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasqualin A, Barone G, Cioffi F, Rosta L, Scienza R, Da Pian R. The relevance of anatomic and hemodynamic factors to a classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 1991;28:370–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taki W, Yonekawa Y, Iwata H, Uno A, Yamashita K, Amemiya H. A new liquid material for embolization of arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;11:163–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Terada T, Nakamura Y, Nakai K, Tsuura M, Nishiguchi T, Hayashi S, Kido T, Taki W, Iwata H, Komai N. Embolization of arteriovenous malformations with peripheral aneurysms using ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg. 1991;75:655–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mounayer C, Hammami N, Piotin M, Spelle L, Benndorf G, Kessler I, Moret J. Nidal embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations using Onyx in 94 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:518–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Beute GN. Brain AVM embolization with Onyx. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:172–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Weber W, Kis B, Siekmann R, Kuehne D. Endovascular treatment of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with Onyx: technical aspects. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:371–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Frizzel RT, Fisher WS. Cure, morbidity, and mortality associated with embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations: a review of 1246 patients in 32 series over a 35-year period. Neurosurgery. 1995;37:1031–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundqvist C, Wikholm G, Svendsen P. Embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: part II—aspects of complications and late outcome. Neurosurgery. 1996;39:460–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nataraj A, Mohamed MB, Gholkar A, Vivar R, Watkins L, Aspoas R, Gregson B, Mitchell P, Mendelow AD. Multimodality treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(1/2):149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley RW, Ducruet AF, McDougall CG, Albuquerque FC. Endovascular advances for brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2014;74:S74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasqualin A, Zampieri P, Nicolato A, Meneghelli P, Cozzi F, Beltramello A. Surgery after embolization of cerebral arterio-venous malformation: experience of 123 cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2014;119:105–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Vinuela F, Duckwiler G, Guglielmi G. Contribution of interventional neuroradiology in the therapeutic management of brain arteriovenous malformations. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1997;6:268–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst RW, Berenstein A, Kupersmith MJ, Madrid M, Flamm ES. Deep central arteriovenous malformations of the brain: the role of endovascular treatment. J Neurosurg. 1995;82:190–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafar JJ, Davis AJ, Berenstein A, Choi IS, Kupersmith MJ. The effect of embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate prior to surgical resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1993;78:60–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar