Advertisement

Beyond Dichotomous Choices: Responses to Chinese Initiative in Southeast Asia

  • Alice D. Ba
Chapter

Abstract

Despite expectations that China’s power status will compel states to balance or bandwagon, the Southeast Asian experience suggests a more complicated story. While great power incentive structures clearly condition Southeast Asian choices, smaller states, moved by strongly held beliefs in self-determination, have complicated large power agendas and initiatives, even as they have sought new cooperation. Drawing on a growing literature on Southeast Asian strategy, this chapter considers a range of Southeast Asian responses as illustrations of states’ efforts to accommodate but also condition China’s role in Southeast Asia. Theoretically, it draws attention to both the changing and immutable conditions that shape Southeast Asian responses, the multidimensionality of Chinese power that complicates easy categorizations, and the social dynamism, not just the structural conditions, of China–Southeast Asian relations.

References

  1. Acharya, Amitav. 2001. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alagappa, Muthiah. 2003. The Study of International Order: An Analytical Framework. In Asian Security Order, ed. Muthiah Alagappa, 33–69. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Asian Politics & Policy. 2012. Asia Must Live with China Driving for Great Power Status: An Interview with Fidel Ramos. Asian Politics & Policy 4 (3): 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asian Survey. 2014. China’s Influence In Developing Asia (Special Issue). Asian Survey 54 (5).Google Scholar
  5. Ba, Alice D. 2005. Southeast Asia and China. In Betwixt and Between: Southeast Asian Strategic Relations with the United States and China, Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies (IDSS) Policy Monograph Series 7, ed. Evelyn Goh, 93–108. Singapore: Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2006. Who’s Socializing Whom? Complex Engagement and Sino-ASEAN Relations. Pacific Review 19 (2): 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2009. (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Regions, Regionalisms, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2014. Is China Leading? China, Southeast Asia, and East Asian Integration. Political Science 66 (2): 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2016. The South China Sea: Primary Contradictions in China-ASEAN Relations. In The South China Sea Dispute: Navigating Diplomatic and Strategic Tensions, ed. Ian Storey and Lin Cheng-yi, 104–133. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  10. Baviera, Aileen. 2014. Domestic Interests and Foreign Policy in China and the Philippines: Implications for the South China Sea Disputes. Philippine Studies 62 (1): 133–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2016. President Duterte’s Foreign Policy Challenges. Contemporary Southeast Asia 38 (2): 202–208.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2017. China’s Strategic Foreign Initiatives Under Xi Jinping. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 2 (1): 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bloomberg. 2016. Why China’s Plan to Build a New Silk Road Runs Through Singapore. Reprinted in Japan Times, August 15. https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/08/15/business/why-chinas-plan-to-build-a-new-silk-road-runs-through-singapore/#.WZxfJpOGMo8.
  14. ———. 2017. China Frictions May See Singapore Miss Out on Belt-Road Billions. Bloomberg News, May 18. Accessed October 31, 2017. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-05-18/singapore-out-in-the-cold-as-southeast-asia-chases-china-cash.
  15. Cai, DeXian. 2013. Hedging for Maximum Flexibility: Singapore’s Pragmatic Approach to Security Relations with the US and China. Pointer: Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces 39 (2): 1–12.Google Scholar
  16. Camba, Alvin. 2016. Contentious Capital: The Political Economy of Chinese Investment in the Philippines. ADR Occasional Paper No 2, November 2016. Makati City: ADR Institute. https://adrinstituteblog.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/adri-oc-paper-36-11-2016-11th-issue.pdf.
  17. Camroux, David. 1994. Looking East’—and Inwards: Internal Factors in Malaysian Foreign Relations During the Mahathir Era, 1981–1994. Australia-Asia Paper No 72. Brisbane: Griffith University.Google Scholar
  18. Channel News Asia. 2017. Malaysia, China Set Up High-Level Defence Cooperation Committee. Channel News Asia, April 23. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/malaysia-china-set-up-high-level-defence-cooperation-committee-8785226.
  19. China Daily. 2016. Malaysian Prime Minister Aims ‘New Heights’ in Bilateral Relations for China Visit. China Daily, October 31. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2016-10/31/content_27222073.htm.
  20. Chong, Alan. 2006. Singapore’s Foreign Policy Beliefs as ‘Abridged Realism’: Pragmatic and Liberal Prefixes in the Foreign Policy Thought of Rajaratnam, Lee, Koh, and Mahbubani. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 6 (2): 269–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chong, Ja Ian. 2016. America’s Asia-Pacific Rebalance and the Hazards of Hedging: A Review of Evidence from Southeast Asia. In Asia Pacific Countries and the US Rebalancing Strategy, ed. D.W.F. Huang, 155. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chong, Ja Ian. 2017a. Diverging Paths? Singapore-China Relations and the East Asian Maritime Domain. Maritime Awareness Project Analysis, April 26. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://maritimeawarenessproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/analysis_chong_04262017-1.pdf.
  23. Chong, Koh Ping. 2017b. China’s Belt and Road Project Could Bring Opportunities and Challenges to S’pore: Minister Lawrence Wong. Straits Times, May 16.Google Scholar
  24. Ciorciari, John. 2009. The Balance of Great Power Influence in Contemporary Southeast Asia. International Relations of the Asia Pacific 9 (1): 157–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. ———. 2010. The Limits of Alignment: Southeast Asia and the Great Powers Since 1945. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Clemente, Tina S. 2016. Understanding the Economic Diplomacy Between the Philippines and China. International Journal of China Studies 7 (2): 215–233.Google Scholar
  27. De Castro, Renato. 2017. Developing a Credible Defense Posture for the Philippines: From the Aquino to the Duterte Administrations. Asian Politics & Policy 9(4): 541–563.Google Scholar
  28. Dosch, Jörn. 2007. Managing Security in ASEAN-China Relations: Liberal Peace of Hegemonic Stability. Asian Perspective 31 (1): 230–231.Google Scholar
  29. Fiori, Antonio, and Andrea Passeri. 2015. Hedging in Search of a New Age of Non-Alignment: Myanmar Between China and the USA. The Pacific Review 28 (5): 679–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Frances Mangosing. 2017. PH, US Hold Coordinated Patrol in Sulu Sea. Inquirer.net, 1 July.Google Scholar
  31. Gindarsah, Iis. 2016. Strategic Hedging in Indonesia’s Defense Diplomacy. Defense and Security Analysis 32 (4): 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goh, Evelyn. 2005. Meeting the China Challenge: The US in Southeast Asian Regional Security Strategies. Policy Studies Monograph 16. Washington, DC: East-West Center.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 2007. Great Powers and Hierarchical Order. International Security 32 (3): 113–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. ———. 2014. Modes of China’s Influence: Cases from Southeast Asia. Asian Survey 54 (5): 835–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 2016. Southeast Asian Strategies Toward the Great Powers: Still Hedging After All These Years? ASAN Special Forum, February 22.Google Scholar
  36. ———, ed. 2016a. Rising China’s Influence in Developing Asia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. ———, ed. 2016b. Southeast Asian Strategies Toward the Great Powers: Still Hedging After All These Years? The Asian Forum, February 22. http://www.theasanforum.org/southeast-asian-strategies-toward-the-great-powers-still-hedging-after-all-these-years/.
  38. Haacke, Jürgen. 2011. The Nature and Management of Myanmar’s Alignment with China: The SLORC/SPDC Years. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 30 (2): 105–140.Google Scholar
  39. Hamilton-Hart, Natasha. 2012. Hard Interests, Soft Illusions: Southeast Asia and American Power. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Han, Enze. 2017. Geopolitics, Ethnic Conflicts Along the Border, and Chinese Foreign Policy Changes Toward Myanmar. Asian Security 13 (1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Heydarian, Richard. 2016. Duterte and Philippine Foreign Policy. Straits Times, May 19.Google Scholar
  42. ———. 2017. Evolving Philippines-U.S.-China Strategic Triangle: International and Domestic Drivers. Asian Politics & Policy 9 (4): 564–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hiep, Le Hong. 2013. Vietnam’s Hedging Strategy Against China Since Normalization. Contemporary Southeast Asia 35 (3): 333–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Huang, Chiung-Chiu. 2015. Balance of Relationship: The Essence of Myanmar’s China Policy. The Pacific Review 28 (2): 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ikenberry, John G., and Charles Kupchan. 1990. Socialization and Hegemonic Power. International Organization 44 (3): 283–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ismail, Laili. 2017. Malaysia-China High-Level Committee to Be Set Up to Discuss Geopolitical Issues, Says Hishammuddin. New Straits Times, March 29.Google Scholar
  47. Jackson, Van. 2014. The Rise and Persistence of Strategic Hedging Across Asia: A System-Level Analysis. In US Alliances and Partnerships at the Center of Global Power, ed. Ashley Tellis, Abraham Denmark, and Greg Chaffin, 317–345. Washington, DC: The National Bureau of Asian Research.Google Scholar
  48. Jan, Wan S.W. 2017. Malaysia’s Priority Is to Manage, Not Stop, China’s Investments. ISEAS Perspective 46, July 3. Accessed October 31, 2017. https://iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2017_46.pdf.
  49. Jeff Schogol. 2016. Philippines Curtails Military Exercises with US. Military Times, 11 December.Google Scholar
  50. Johnston, A. Iain. 2003. Socialization in International Institutions: The ASEAN Way and International Relations Theory. In International Relations Theory and the Asia-Pacific, ed. G. John Ikenberry and Michael Mastanduno, 107–162. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Johnston, Alastair Iain, and Robert S. Ross, eds. 1999. Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  52. Kausikan, Bilahari. 2016. Standing Up to and Getting Along with China. Today Online, May 18.Google Scholar
  53. Keohane, Robert. 1994. After Hegemony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kindleberger, Charles. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  55. Kraft, Herman. 2017. Great Power Dynamics and the Waning of ASEAN Centrality in Regional Security. Asian Politics & Policy 9(4): 596–612.Google Scholar
  56. Krasner, Stephen. 1976. State Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. World Politics 28 (3): 317–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ku, Charlotte. 1991. The Archipelagic States Concept and Regional Stability in Southeast Asia. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 23 (3): 463–478.Google Scholar
  58. Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. 2008. The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia 30 (2): 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. ———. 2013. Making Sense of Malaysia’s China Policy: Asymmetry, Proximity, and Elite’s Domestic Authority. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 6 (4): 429–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. ———. 2016a. Malaysia Between the United States and China: What Do Weaker States Hedge Against? Asian Politics and Policy 8 (1): 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. ———. 2016b. How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking ASEAN States’ Alignment Behavior Towards China. Journal of Contemporary China 25 (100): 500–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Laksmana, Evan A. 2017. Indonesia’s Rising Regional and Global Profile: Does Size Really Matter? Contemporary Southeast Asia 33 (2): 157–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lee, Lai T. 2001. The Lion and the Dragon: A View on Singapore-China Relations. Journal of Contemporary China 10 (28): 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lim, Darren J., and Zack Cooper. 2015. Reassessing Hedging: The Logic of Alignment in East Asia. Security Studies 24 (4): 696–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lobell, Steven, Neal G. Jesse, and Kristen P. Williams. 2015. Why Do Secondary States Choose to Support, Follow, or Challenge? International Politics 52 (2): 146–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. McDougall, Derek. 2012. Responses to ‘Rising China’ in the East Asian Region; Soft Balancing with Accommodation. Journal of Contemporary China 21 (73): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ngeow, Chow Bing. 2016. Comprehensive Strategic Partners but Prosaic Military Ties: The Development of Malaysia-China Defence Relations 1991–2015. Contemporary Southeast Asia 37 (2): 269–304.Google Scholar
  68. Parameswaran, Prashanth. 2016. China, Malaysia Mull Dispute Resolution for ‘Belt and Road’ Countries. The Diplomat, September 20.Google Scholar
  69. ———. 2017. Delicate Equilibrium: Indonesia’s Approach to the South China Sea. In Power Politics in Asia’s Contested Waters: Global Power Shift, ed. Enrico Fels and T.M. Vu, 319–336. Cham et al.: Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Peou, Sorpong. 2014. Why China’s Rise May Not Cause Major Power-Transition War: A Review Essay. Asian Polits & Policy 6 (1): 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reilly, James. 2012. A Norm Taker or a Norm Maker? Chinese Aid in Southeast Asia. Journal of Contemporary Southeast Asia 21 (73): 71–91.Google Scholar
  72. Reuters. 2016. Lorenzana: Duterte Retaining PH-U.S. Security Alliance. Reuters, 8 November.Google Scholar
  73. ———. 2017. US, Philippines Navy Ships Patrol Sulu Sea. Reuters, 1 July.Google Scholar
  74. Salmon, Mohammad. 2017. Strategic Hedging and Unipolarity’s Demise: The Case of China’s Strategic Hedging. Asian Politics & Policy 9 (3): 354–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schüller, Margot, Magnus Brod, Daniel Neff, and Marco Bünte. 2010. China’s Emergence Within Southeast Asia’s Aid Architecture: New Kid on the Block? Conference Paper presented at AidData Conference on Aid Transparency and Developing Finance, University College, Oxford, March 22–25, 2010.Google Scholar
  76. Snyder, Craig. 2015. Australia-Malaysia Security Cooperation as a Pivotal Component for More Stable Bilateral Relations. Asian Politics & Policy 7 (3): 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Steinberg, David I., and Hongwei Fan. 2012. Modern China-Myanmar Relations: Dilemmas of Mutual Dependence. Copenhagen: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies.Google Scholar
  78. Storey, Ian J. 2011. Southeast Asia and the Rise of China. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Sun, Yjn. 2014. China, the United States and the Kachin Conflict. Simson Issue Brief 2 (January).Google Scholar
  80. Sun, Yun. 2012. China’s Strategic Misjudgment on Myanmar. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 31 (1): 73–96.Google Scholar
  81. Suryodiningrat, Meidyatama. 2010. US Rapprochement with Indonesia: From Problem State to Partner – A Response. Contemporary Southeast Asia 32 (3): 388–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tan, See Seng. 2012. Faced with the Dragon: Perils and Prospects in Singapore’s Ambivalent Relationship with China. Chinese Journal of International Politics 5: 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tessman, Brock F. 2012. System Structure and State Strategy: Adding Hedging to the Menu. Security Studies 21 (2): 192–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Venzon, Cliff. 2014. Philippines Gives China’s Regional Bank Benefit of the Doubt, Nikkei Asian Review, December 11.Google Scholar
  85. Wilson, Trevor. 2016. Strategic Choices in Myanmar’s Transition and Myanmar’s National Security Policies. Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 3 (1): 62–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Womack, Brantly. 2003/4. China and Southeast Asia: Asymmetry, Leadership, and Normalcy. Pacific Affairs 76 (4): 529–548.Google Scholar
  87. ———. 2011. The Spratlys: From Dangerous Ground to Apple of Discord. Contemporary Southeast Asia 33 (3): 370–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Xinhua. 2014. China Has Done a Lot in Regional Economic Integration: Philippine Official. Xinhua, November 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alice D. Ba
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations