Advertisement

Hedging and Wedging: Strategies to Contest Russia’s Leadership in Post-Soviet Eurasia

  • Stefan Meister
Chapter

Abstract

Consecutive Russian leaderships have attempted to project power and influence in its “near abroad”. From Moscow’s perspective, all post-Soviet countries only have limited sovereignty. However, Russia’s declining economic power and the interest of the ruling elites in the Eurasian countries to consolidate sovereignty lead to different contestation strategies. The success of these strategies depends on the countries’ resources, their geographic proximity to external players, and their elites’ bargaining abilities. In this chapter, the author illustrates the attempts by secondary or tertiary states in Eurasia to contest Russia’s leadership ambitions and identifies the key motivations behind Eurasian contestation. The chapter categorizes the different types of contestation strategies. The more Russia tries to dominate its post-Soviet neighbors, the more it will push the countries further away.

References

  1. Abrahamyan, Eduard. 2016. Russia and Armenia Establish Joint Ground Forces. The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst. Accessed August 24, 2017. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13416-russia-and-armenia-establish-joint-ground-forces.html.
  2. Balmaceda, Margarita M. 2013. Politics of Energy Dependency: Ukraine, Belarus, and Lithuania Between Domestic Oligarchs and Russian Pressure. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bohdan, Siharei. 2017. Not All Roads Lead to Moscow: Belarusian Arms Industries Between Russia and China. Belarus Digests, August 14. Accessed August 24, 2017. http://belarusdigest.com/story/not-all-roads-lead-to-moscow-belarusian-arms-industries-between-russia-and-china/.
  4. BTC. 2017. Belarusian Seismologists Sign Major Contracts with Ukrainian Companies. Belarusian Television Channel CTV. Accessed August 26, 2017. http://en.ctv.by/en/1503384333-belarusian-seismologists-sign-major-contracts-with-ukrainian-companies.
  5. Cooper, Julian. 2013. From USSR to Russia: The Fate of the Military Economy. In Handbook of the Economics and Political Economies of Transition, ed. Paul Hare and Gerard Turley, 98–107. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, Andrew F., and Timothy M. Shaw. 2009. The Diplomacies of Small States at the Start of the Twenty-First Century: How Vulnerable? How Resilient? In The Diplomacies of Small States: Between Vulnerability and Resilience, ed. Andrew F. Cooper and Timothy M. Shaw, 1–18. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dong, Wang. 2015. Is China Trying to Push the U.S. out of East Asia? China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 1 (1): 59–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dragneva, Rilka, and Kataryna Wolczuk. 2017. The Eurasian Economic Union. Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power. Chatham House Research Paper. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  9. Dunnett, Chris. 2015. Why the Economies of Ukraine and Russia are Nearly Inseparable? Hromadske International. Accessed August 24, 2017. https://medium.com/@Hromadske/why-economies-of-ukraine-and-russia-are-almost-inseparable-783834461dd5.
  10. Dzutsev, Valeriy. 2015. Russia to Strip Abkhazia and South Ossetia of Their Limited Sovereignty. The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst. Accessed August 26, 2017. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13163-russia-to-strip-abkhazia-and-south-ossetia-of-their-limited-sovereignty.html.
  11. Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2017. International Organizations. Accessed September 3. http://www.kazakhembus.com/content/international-organizations.
  12. Euronews. 2017. Ukraine Prioritises EU Integration. Euronews. Accessed August 25, 2017. http://www.euronews.com/2017/08/24/ukraine-poroshenko-prioritises-eu-integration-nato-membership-independence-day.
  13. globalEDGE. 2015. Azerbaijan: Trade Statistics. globalEDGE. Accessed August 24, 2017. https://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/azerbaijan/tradestats.
  14. Gnedina, Elena. 2015. ‘Multi-Vector’ Foreign Policies in Europe: Balancing, Bandwagoning or Bargaining? Europe-Asia Studies 67 (7): 1007–1029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goble, Paul. 2017. Having Lost ‘Soft’ Power in Post-Soviet Space, Moscow Increasingly Using ‘Hard’. Eurasia Daily Monitor. Accessed August 24, 2017. https://jamestown.org/program/lost-soft-power-post-soviet-space-moscow-increasingly-using-hard/.
  16. Grigoryan, Armen. 2015. Armenia and the Iran Deal. The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst. Accessed August 25, 2017. https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/13263-armenia-and-the-iran-deal.html.
  17. Haukkala, Hiski. 2013. The EU and Russia and Their ‘Common Neighborhood’: Can the Two Finally Move from Competition to Cooperation? In Economization Versus Power Ambitions: Rethinking Russia’s Policy Towards Post-Soviet States, ed. Stefan Meister, 91–104. Baden-Baden: DGAP and Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hicks, Christina. 2014. Bases Covered: Russian Military Basis in Former Soviet Union. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Accessed August 26, 2017. https://www.rferl.org/a/25286471.html.
  19. Idan, Avinoam, and Brenda Shaffer. 2011. The Foreign Policies of Post-Soviet Landlocked States. Post-Soviet Affairs 27 (3): 241–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ioffe, Grigory. 2017. Toward a More Belarusian Belarus. Eurasia Daily Monitor. Accessed August 26, 2017. https://jamestown.org/program/toward-a-more-belarusian-belarus/.
  21. Kakachia, Kornely. 2013. Georgia and Russia: From Uneasy Rapprochement to Divorce? PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo 264. Accessed August 24, 2017. http://www.ponarseurasia.org/sites/default/files/policy-memos-pdf/Pepm_264_Kakachia_July2013_0.pdf.
  22. Kappeler, Andreas. 2008. Russland als Vielvölkerstaat: Entstehung, Geschichte, Zerfall. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
  23. Keohane, Robert O. 1969. Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small States in International Politics. International Organizations 23 (2): 291–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krickovic, Andrej, and Maxim Bratersky. 2017. Benevolent Hegemon, Neighborhood Bully, or Regional Security Provider? Russia’s Efforts to Promote Regional Integration After 2013–2014 Ukraine Crisis. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (2): 180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kryshtanovskaja, Olga, and Stephen White. 1996. From Soviet Nomenklatura to Russian Elite. Europe-Asia Studies 48 (5): 711–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kucera, Joshua. 2015. Report: Azerbaijan Gets 85 Percent of Its Weapons from Russia. EURASIANET.org. Accessed August 25, 2017. http://www.eurasianet.org/node/72581.
  27. Kuzio, Taras. 2006. Is Ukraine Part of Europe’s Future? The Washington Quarterly 29 (3): 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lobell, E. Steven, Neal G. Jesse, and Kristen P. Williams. 2015. Why Do Secondary States Choose to Support, Follow or Challenge? International Politics 52 (2): 146–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLees, Alexandra, and Eugen Rumer. 2014. Saving Ukraine’s Defense Industry. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Accessed August 26, 2017. http://carnegieendowment.org/2014/07/30/saving-ukraine-s-defense-industry-pub-56282.
  30. Meister, Stefan. 2013. Introduction. In Economization Versus Power Ambitions: Rethinking Russia’s Policy Towards Post-Soviet States, ed. Stefan Meister, 7–17. Baden-Baden: DGAP and Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus. 2017. Belarus and International Organizations. Accessed September 3, 2017, http://mfa.gov.by/en/organizations/membership/.
  32. Moshes, Arkady. 2013. A Marriage of Unequals: Russian-Ukrainian Relations Under President Yanukovych. In Economization Versus Power Ambitions: Rethinking Russia’s Policy Towards Post-Soviet States, ed. Stefan Meister, 59–72. Baden-Baden: DGAP and Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Najibullah, Farangis. 2014. Putin Downplays Kazakh Independence, Sparks Angry Reaction. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Accessed August 26, 2017. https://www.rferl.org/a/kazakhstan-putin-history-reaction-nation/26565141.html.
  34. NDI. 2017. Georgian’s Increasingly Support EU and Euro-Atlantic Aspirations; View Russia as a Threat. National Democratic Institute. Accessed August 26, 2017. https://www.ndi.org/publications/ndi-poll-georgians-increasingly-support-eu-and-euro-atlantic-aspirations-view-russia.
  35. Nice, Alex. 2013. Playing Both Sides: Belarus Between Russia and the EU. In Economization Versus Power Ambitions: Rethinking Russia’s Policy Towards Post-Soviet States, ed. Stefan Meister, 73–89. Baden-Baden: DGAP and Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. OSCE. 2011. Executive Summary of the ‘Report of the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs’ Field Assessment Mission to the Occupied Territories of Azerbaijan Surrounding Nagorno-Karabakh’. Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. Accessed August 24, 2017. http://www.osce.org/mg/76209?download=true.
  37. Preiherman, Yauheni. 2017. Belarus’s Asymmetric Relations with Russia: The Case of Strategic Hedging? Uptake Working Paper 4. Accessed August 24, 2017. http://www.uptake.ut.ee/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/04_preiherman.pdf.
  38. RFE/RL. 2017. Fifth Round Of Syria Peace Talks Under Way In Astana. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. Accessed August 26, 2017. https://www.rferl.org/a/syria-astana-talks-continue-sdf-breaches-raqqa-wall/28595257.html.
  39. Ripsman, Norrin, Jeffrey Taliaferro, and Steven Lobell. 2016. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sherr, James. 2013. Hard Diplomacy and Soft Coercion: Russia’s Influence Abroad. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  41. Siwizkij, Arsenij. 2014. Belarus: Gedämpfte Integrationseuphorie. In Die Eurasische Wirtschaftsunion: Analysen und Perspektiven aus Belarus, Kasachstan und Russland, ed. Felix Hett and Susanne Szkola, 14–19. Berlin: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  42. Smith-Spark, Laura. 2017. Mattis Vows US Support for Ukraine Against Russian ‘Aggression’. CNN, August 24. Accessed August 27, 2017. http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/24/politics/ukraine-us-mattis/index.html.
  43. TUT.BY. 2016. Makei v Pol’she: My chotim uity ot sil’noj sovisimost ot Rossii (Makei in Poland: We Want to Leave from Strong Dependence from Russia). TUT.BY. Accessed August 27, 2017. http://news.tut.by/politics/515492.html.
  44. Walker, Shaun. 2013. Vladimir Putin Offers Ukraine Financial Incentives to Stick with Russia. The Guardian, December 12. Accessed August 24, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/17/ukraine-russia-leaders-talks-kremlin-loan-deal.
  45. Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  46. Williamson, James, ed. 1993. The Economic Consequences of Soviet Disintegration. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  47. Zhuchkova, Yulia. 2017. Armenia’s Hands Are Tied Regarding Russian Arms Sales to Azerbaijan. Eurasia Daily Monitor. Accessed August 26, 2017. https://jamestown.org/armenias-hands-are-tied-regarding-russian-arms-sales-to-azerbaijan/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Meister
    • 1
  1. 1.German Council on Foreign RelationsBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations