Advertisement

Contested Regional Leadership: Russia and Eurasia

  • S. Neil MacFarlane
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter addresses Russian leadership in the former Soviet region. It considers the comparative context of approaches to regional leadership. The Russian version falls on the hegemonic/coercive end of that spectrum. The analysis proceeds to discuss power indicators in the region, showing the degree of Russian dominance. The chapter then examines the evolution of Russia’s perspectives on and practice of leadership, arguing that, after a period of debate, a consensual elite view, supported by public opinion, has emerged. That view constitutes a profound challenge to Western views of regional order in Europe. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how to explain the approach that Russia has taken.

References

  1. Acharya, Amitav. 2004. How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism. International Organization 58 (2): 239–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2014. Global International Relations and Regional Worlds. International Studies Quarterly 58 (4): 647–659.Google Scholar
  3. Akopov, Pyotr. 2017. Myunkhenskii Prigovor Priveden v ispolnenie [The Munich Speech Is Being Brought into Practice]. Vzglyad, February 10. Accessed July 30, 2017. http://vz.ru/politics/2017/2/10857204.html.
  4. Asmus, Ronald. 2010. A Little War that Shook the World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Barry, Ellen. 2009. Milk War Strains Russia-Belarus Ties. New York Times, June 14. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/15/world/europe/15belarus.html.
  6. Chubais, Anatoly. 2003. Anatoly Chubais: Russia Should Attempt to Create a Liberal Empire in CIS. Pravda ru, September 25. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.pravdareport.com/news/russia/25-09-2003/52757-0/.
  7. CIS. 1991. Soglashenie o Sozdanii Sodruzhestvo Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv (Agreement on the Establishment of the Commonwealth of Independent States), December 8. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.cis.minsk.by/reestr/ru/index.html#reestr/text.
  8. ———. 1993. Charter Establishing the Commonwealth of Independent States (Translation), January 22. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.dipublico.org/100617/charter-establishing-the-commonwealth-of-independent-states-cis/.
  9. CSCE. 1975. Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe: Final Act. Helsinki: CSCE. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.osce.org/helsinki-final-act?download=true.
  10. ———. 1990. Charter of Paris for a New Europe (November). Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.osce.org/mc/39516?download=true.
  11. CSTO. 2002. Ustav Organizatsii Dogovora o Kollektivnoi Bezopasnosti (Charter of the Collective Security Organization), October 7. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.odkb.gov.ru/start/index_aengl.htm.
  12. Dragneva, Rilka, and Kataryna Wolczuk. 2017. The Eurasian Economic Union: Deals, Rules and the Exercise of Power. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  13. Dreyer, Iana, and Nicu Popescu. 2014. The Eurasian Customs Union: The Economics and the Politics. Issue Brief 11. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  14. Gabuev, Alexander. 2017. Bigger, Not Better: Russia Makes SCO a Useless Club. Moscow: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  15. Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hurrell, Andrew. 2007. One World? Many Worlds? The Place of Regions in International Society. International Affairs 83 (1): 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kagan, Robert. 2017. The Twilight of the World Liberal Order. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  18. Karaganov, Sergei. 2016. Chast’ Rossiiskikh Elit – v Prostranstve, a chast’ khochet, chobyi vsyo rukhnulo. Rossia v Globa’lnoi Politike, March 1.Google Scholar
  19. Karaganov, Sergei, Timofei Bordachev, and Dmitry Suslov. 2009. Russia and the U.S.: Reconfiguration, Not Resetting. Russia in Global Affairs 3. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/n_13588.
  20. Keal, Paul. 1983. Unspoken Rules and Superpower Dominance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lavrov, Sergey. 2016. Russia’s Foreign Policy in a Historical Perspective. Russia in Global Affairs 2 (April–June). Accessed October 31, 2017. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/Russias-Foreign-Policy-in-a-Historical-Perspective-18067.
  22. MacFarlane, S. Neil. 2016. Kto Vinovat? Why Is There a Crisis in Russia’s Relations with the West? Contemporary Politics 22 (3): 342–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. MacFarlane, S. Neil, and Anand Menon. 2014. The EU and Ukraine. Survival 56 (3): 95–102.Google Scholar
  24. Mankoff, Jeffrey. 2012. Russian Foreign Policy: The Return of Great Power Politics. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  25. Mearsheimer, John. 2015. Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault. Foreign Affairs, September–October. Accessed October 31, 2017. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/Russia-fsu/2014-08-18/why-ukraine-crisis-wests-fault.
  26. Medvedev, Dmitry. 2009. The Draft of the European Security Treaty. Moscow: Presidency of Russia. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://en.kremlin.ru/president/news/6152.
  27. Olcott, Martha B., Anders Aslund, and Sherman W. Garnett. 1999. Getting It Wrong: Regional Cooperation and the Commonwealth of Independent States. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  28. Putin, Vladimir. 2007. Putin’s Prepared Remarks at 43rd Munich Conference on Security Policy. The Washington Post, February 12. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.washngtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/12/AR20070212005.
  29. ———. 2008. Text of Putin’s Speech at NATO Summit. Bucharest, April 2. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.unian.info/world/111033-text-of-putins-speech-at-nato-summit-bucharest.
  30. ———. 2011. A New Integration Project for Eurasia. Izvestia, October 3.Google Scholar
  31. RFE/RL. 2017. Russia, China Veto UN Sanctions Against Syria for Chemical Attacks. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, February 28. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.rferl.org/a/russia-china-block-un-sanctions-syria-chemical-weapons/28338960.html?ltflags=mailer .
  32. Rumer, Eugene, and Angela Stent. 2009. Russia and the West. Survival 51 (2): 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Russia. 2000. The National Security Concept of the Russian Federation, January 10. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/official_documents/-/asset_publisher/CptICkB6BZ29/content/id/589768.
  34. ———. 2008. The Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation. Moscow: President of Russia. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://archive.kremlin.ru/english/text/docs/2008/07/204750.shtml.
  35. ———. 2015. The Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation. Approved by the President of the Russian Federation on December 25, 2014 (Moscow). Accessed October 31, 2017. http://rusemb.org.uk/press/2029.
  36. ———. 2016a. Kontseptsia Vneshnei Politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation], November 30. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201612010045?index=1&rangeSize=1.
  37. ———. 2016b. The Russian Federation’s National Security Strategy (Translation), December 31. Moscow: Office of the President. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/OtrasPublicaciones/Internacional/2016/Russian-National-Security-Strategy-31Dec2015.pdf.
  38. Russia (Ministry of Foreign Affairs). 1993. Kontseptsia Vneshnei Politiki Rossiiskoi Federatsia [Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation], January 25. Moscow: MID.Google Scholar
  39. Safranchuk, Ivan. 2008. The Competition for Security Roles in Central Asia. Russia in Global Affairs, March 2. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/n_10358.
  40. SCO. 2005. Declaration by the Heads of the Member States of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, July. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://eng.sectsco.org/documents/.
  41. Surkov, Vladislav. 2007. Suverenitet – Eto Politicheskii Sinonim Konkurentno-Sposobnosti [Sovereignty Is a Political Symbol of Competitive Capacity]. In Pro Suverennuyu Demokratiu [For a Sovereign Democracy], ed. Gleb Pavlovskii. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Evropa”.Google Scholar
  42. Tashkent. 1992. Dogovor o Kollektivnoi Bezopasnosti, May 15. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://www.odkb.gov.ru/start/index_aengl.htm.
  43. Trenin, Dmitri. 2016a. A Five Year Outlook for Russian Foreign Policy: Demands, Drivers, and Influences. Moscow: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://carnegie.ru/2016/03/18/five-year-outlook-for-russian-foreign-demands-drivers-and-influences.
  44. ———. 2016b. Na Zapadnom Upravlenie: Politika RF posle Vyborov Prezidenta SShA [In the Western Direction: The Policy of the Russian Federation After the U.S. Presidential Elections], December 7. Moscow: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://carnegie.run/2016/12/07/ru-pub-66357?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTW1EM1kySX1PVEExW.
  45. Tsygankov, Andrei P. 2016. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  46. Walker, Martin. 2007. Russia v. Europe: The Energy Wars. World Policy Journal 24 (1 Spring): 2.Google Scholar
  47. Wiegand, Gunnar, and Evelina Schulz. 2015. The EU and Its Eastern Partnership: Political Association and Economic Integration in a Rough Neighborhood. In EYIEL. Special Issue Trade Policy Between Law, Diplomacy and Scholarship—Liberal Amicorum in Memoriam Horst G. Krenzler, ed. Christoph Hermann, Bruno Simma, and Rudolf Streinz, 321–358. Cham et al. Springer.Google Scholar
  48. World Bank. 2016. Data by Country. Accessed October 31, 2017. http://data.worldbank.org/country.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Neil MacFarlane
    • 1
  1. 1.Oxford UniversityOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations