Case Illustration: Creating EnerServe

  • Jan A. P. Hoogervorst
Chapter
Part of the The Enterprise Engineering Series book series (TEES)

Abstract

For additionally illustrating the enterprise design concepts outlined in Chap.  4, the concepts are applied in the transformation of an existing energy company into a new (fictitious) energy company called EnerServe in aiming to address the requirements and opportunities of Europe’s open energy market. After sketching the characteristics of this new market and the paradigm shifts these characteristics imply—the new strategic context which design should address—the design aspects and areas of concern for EnerServe are defined. With reference to the essentials of enterprise change outlined in Chap.  3, the character of change for creating EnerServe is described. Since EnerServe, as an ideological choice, adopts the employee-centric theory of organization, specific attention is paid to culture and behavior change and the provisioning of meaningful work and the way to effectuate these desirables through enterprise design. Given these desirables, various concrete examples of enterprise requirements and enterprise architecture are given, which also express the argued holistic, enterprise-wide perspective as a crucial condition for EnerServe’s operational and strategic success. EnerServe’s design starts with developing its essential models, as outlined in the previous chapter. A considerable problem in creating EnerServe is addressing the historically created complexity of IT systems (‘IT legacy complexity’). Organizational means to address this complexity are outlined, which further illustrate the need to address IT from within the overall enterprise governance perspective. For creating successful change, the arrangement of enterprise governance and the central enterprise governance function and processes is crucial. All these topics are discussed within the context of EnerServe, including the levels of enterprise governance maturity. Finally, the personal competences of enterprise engineers are outlined.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boelens, L.: De focus op competenties. PW, pp. 14–17, April 1997Google Scholar
  2. Bonham, S.S.: IT Portfolio Management. Arte House, Norwood (2005)Google Scholar
  3. Buchanan, R.: Enterprise Architecture and Strategic Planning Synergies. Meta Group Research, Enterprise Planning and Architecture Strategies, September 2003Google Scholar
  4. Carr, N.G.: Does IT Matter? Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  5. Cecere, M., Leganza, G.: Methods of Funding Enterprise Architecture Efforts. Giga Research, August 2002Google Scholar
  6. CSC. Strategies for Dealing with Legacy Systems. CSC Research (1994)Google Scholar
  7. Dragoon, A.: The resourceful governance. CIO Magazine, August 2003Google Scholar
  8. Hoogervorst, J.A.P.: Foundations of Enterprise Governance and Enterprise Engineering—Presenting the Employee-Centric Theory of Organization. Springer, Berlin (2018)Google Scholar
  9. Kaplan, J.: Strategic IT Portfolio Management. PRTM Publishing, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  10. Kolk, N.: Het belang van competenties voor organisatie en individu. In: Koopman, P.L., et al. (Red.) Boven het maaiveld, Vinden en binden van competente en gemotiveerde medewerkers. Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  11. Koopman, P.L.: Strategisch Human Resource Management: externe ‘fit’ en interne coherentie. In: Koopman, P.L., et al. (Red.) Boven het maaiveld, Vinden en binden van competente en gemotiveerde medewerkers. Uitgeverij Nieuwezijds, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  12. Mayall, A.: Practical steps for dealing with legacy systems. CSC Research (2002)Google Scholar
  13. Perks, C., Beveridge, T.: Guide to Enterprise IT Architecture. Springer, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  14. Ramos, L.: Favor corporate tax model for funding enterprise portal infrastructure. Giga Research, April 2003Google Scholar
  15. Ross, J.W., Weil, P., Robertson, D.C.: Enterprise Architecture as Strategy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)Google Scholar
  16. Smid, N., Rambelje, M. de La: De basis voor succes. Gids voor Personeelmanagement, Jrg.76, No 7/8, pp. 45–47 (1997)Google Scholar
  17. Snyder, W.: Eliminating Surplus Legacy Systems: The Last Step of Project Planning, Meta Group, Enterprise Data Center Strategies, August 2002Google Scholar
  18. Thompson, M.: The Taming of the IT Department. Butler Group Review, September 2003Google Scholar
  19. Weil, P., Broadbent, M.: Leveraging the New Infrastructure. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
  20. Ziff Davis Media. Research study legacy systems. CIO Insight, October 2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan A. P. Hoogervorst
    • 1
  1. 1.BennebroekThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations