Advertisement

Answering to Transgenerational Violence

  • Rivka Syd Eisner
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary Performance InterActions book series (CPI)

Abstract

Beginning with cô Nhựt’s Agent Orange/dioxin activism, Chap.  5 forwards the idea of “prospective remembering” to describe the politics and practice of the veterans’ remembering performances and civic commitments. The conclusion then addresses some critical, transgenerational implications of historical violence, turning to the veterans’ connections with Vietnam’s postwar generations, who still bear the material effects of the past’s enduring brutality. The children living with Agent Orange/dioxin-attributed illness and disability at the Làng Hòa Bình medical facility and orphanage (re)embody the effects of Vietnam’s legacies of wartime violence. Offering subtle, remarkable examples of everyday performance intervention, Eisner finds the children enact what the veterans also teach: that living more justly with others requires practicing a performative politics of memory that is hauntological and prospective in its intentions, visions, and actions.

References

  1. Agent Orange Record. 2010. “Enough Toxic Herbicide Sprayed to Blanket ¼ of the Country.” Accessed September 12, 2017. http://www.agentorangerecord.com/home/.
  2. Aristotle. 2000. Poetics. In Classical Literary Criticism. Translated by Penelope Murray and T. S. Dorsch, 57–97. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1990. Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays. Edited by Michael Holquist and Vadim Liapunov. Translated by Vadim Liapunov. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bal, Mieke. 1999. “Introduction.” In Acts of Memory: Cultural Recall in the Present. Edited by Mieke Bal, Jonathan Crewe, and Leo Spitzer, vii–xvii. Hanover: Dartmouth College.Google Scholar
  5. Benjamin, Walter. 1969. Illuminations. Edited by Hannah Arendt. Translated by Harry Zohn. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  6. Brecht, Bertolt. 1997. Brecht on Theater: The Development of an Aesthetic. Edited and translated by John Willet. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
  7. Brison, Susan J. 1999. “Symptoms of Discursivity: Experience, Memory, and Trauma.” In Acts of Memory: Cultural Recall in the Present. Edited by Mieke Bal, Jonathan Crewe, and Leo Spitzer, 39–54. Hanover: Dartmouth College.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Caruth, Cathy. 1995. “Introduction.” In Trauma: Explorations in Memory. Edited by Cathy Caruth, 3–12. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Caruth, Cathy. 1996. Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen-Cruz, Jan. 1998. “General Introduction.” In Radical Street Performance: An International Anthology. Edited by Jan Cohen-Cruz, 1–6. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Conquergood, Dwight. 1985. “Performing as a Moral Act: Ethical Dimensions of the Ethnography of Performance.” Literature in Performance 5.2: 1–11.Google Scholar
  14. Craps, Stef. 2013. Postcolonial Witnessing: Trauma out of Bounds. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Derrida, Jacques. 1994. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International. Translated by Peggy Kamuf. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Derrida, Jacques. 1998. Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression. Translated by Eric Prenowitz. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Eisner, Rivka Syd. 2011. “Performing Prospective Memory.” Cultural Studies 25.6: 892–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fox, Diane Niblack. 2010. “Agent Orange, Vietnam, and the United States: Blurring the Boundaries.” In Vietnam and the West: New Approaches. Edited by Wynn Wilcox, 175–194. Ithaca: Cornell University, Southeast Asia Program Publications.Google Scholar
  19. Fox, Diane Niblack. 2013. “Agent Orange: Coming to Terms with a Transnational Legacy.” In Four Decades On: Vietnam, the United States, and the Legacies of the Second Indochina War. Edited by Scott Laderman and Edwin A. Martini, 207–241. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gammeltoft, Tine M. 2014. Haunting Images: A Cultural Account of Selective Reproduction in Vietnam. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon, Avery F. 2004. Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, Jacquelyn Dowd. 1998. “‘You Must Remember This’: Autobiography as Social Critique.” Journal of American History 85.2: 439–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, Stuart. 1992. “Cultural Studies and its Theoretical Legacies.” In Cultural Studies. Edited by Lawrence Grossberg, Cary Nelson, and Paula A. Treichler, 277–294. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, Stuart. 1996. “When was ‘the Post-Colonial’? Thinking at the Limit.” In The Postcolonial Question: Common Skies, Divided Horizons. Edited by Iain Chambers and Lidia Curti, 242–260. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Hirsch, Marianne. 1999. “Projected Memory: Holocaust Photographs in Personal and Public Fantasy.” In Acts of Memory: Cultural Recall in the Present. Edited by Mieke Bal, Jonathan Crewe, and Leo Spitzer, 3–23. Hanover: Dartmouth College.Google Scholar
  26. Kershaw, Baz. 1999. The Radical in Performance: Between Brecht and Baudrillard. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Kristeva, Julia. 1997. The Portable Kristeva. Edited by Kelly Oliver. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  28. LaCapra, Dominick. 1999. “Trauma, Absence, Loss.” Critical Inquiry 25.4: 696–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. LaCapra, Dominick. 2001. Writing History, Writing Trauma. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Laub, Dori. 1995. “Truth and Testimony: The Process and the Struggle.” In Trauma: Explorations in Memory. Edited by Cathy Caruth, 61–75. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Le Thi Nham Tuyet, and Annika Johansson. 2001. “Impact of Chemical Warfare with Agent Orange on Women’s Reproductive Lives in Vietnam: A Pilot Study.” Reproductive Health Matters 9.18: 156–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Madison, D. Soyini. 2010. Acts of Activism: Human Rights as Radical Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malarney, Shaun Kingsley. 2003. “Return to the Past? The Dynamics of Contemporary Religious and Ritual Transformation.” In Postwar Vietnam: Dynamics of a Transforming Society. Edited by Hy V. Luong, 225–256. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. Nguyen, Viet Thanh. 2013. “Just Memory: War and the Ethics of Remembrance.” American Literary History 25.1: 144–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nguyen, Viet Thanh. 2016. Nothing Ever Dies: Vietnam and the Memory of War. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Oliver, Kelly. 2001. Witnessing: Beyond Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ong, Walter J. 2001. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Phelan, Peggy. 1998. Unmarked: The Politics of Performance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Pollock, Della. 1998. “Introduction: Making History Go.” In Exceptional Spaces: Essays in Performance and History. Edited by Della Pollock, 1–45. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pollock, Della. 1999. Telling Bodies Performing Birth. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Pollock, Della. 2005. “Introduction: Remembering.” In Remembering: Oral History Performance. Edited by Della Pollock, 1–18. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pollock, Della. 2006. “Memory, Remembering and Histories of Change: A Performance Praxis.” In The SAGE Handbook of Performance Studies. Edited by D. Soyini Madison and Judith Hamera, 87–105. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Rothberg, Michael. 2009. Multidirectional Memory: Remembering the Holocaust in the Age of Decolonization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rothman, Joshua. 2017. “Are Disability Rights and Animal Rights Connected?” The New Yorker, June 6. Accessed June 6, 2017. http://www.newyorker.com/culture/persons-of-interest/are-disability-rights-and-animal-rights-connected.
  45. Russo, Mary. 1994. The Female Grotesque: Risk, Excess, and Modernity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Schwenkel, Christina. 2009. The American War in Contemporary Vietnam: Transnational Remembrance and Representation. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Shildrick, Margrit. 2002. Embodying the Monster: Encounters with the Vulnerable Self. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Simon, Roger I. 2000. “The Paradoxical Practice of Zakhor: Memories of ‘That Which Has Never Been My Fault of Deed’.” In Between Hope and Despair: Pedagogy and the Remembrance of Historical Trauma. Edited by Roger I. Simon, Sharon Rosenberg, and Claudia Eppert, 9–25. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  50. Simon, Roger I. 2005. The Touch of the Past: Remembrance, Learning, and Ethics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 1994. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Colonial Discourse and Postcolonial Theory: A Reader. Edited by Patrick Williams and Laura Chrisman, 66–111. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2005. “Foreword: Upon Reading the Companion to Postcolonial Studies.” In A Companion to Postcolonial Studies. Edited by Henry Schwarz and Sangeeta Ray, xv–xxii. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. War Legacies Project. n.d. “We can’t change our legacy. Or can we?” Accessed September 12, 2017. http://www.warlegaciesproject.org/.
  54. Zierler, David. 2011. The Invention of Ecocide: Agent Orange, Vietnam, and the Scientists That Change the Way We Think about the Environment. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rivka Syd Eisner
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations