Advertisement

William Baumol’s “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive”

  • Matthew McCaffrey
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter offers a retrospective account of William Baumol’s “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive” in light of its influence on entrepreneurship studies. The first section describes Baumol’s core arguments about the influence of institutions on the allocation of entrepreneurial talent. The second section then discusses their impact on the entrepreneurship discipline. Following this, the third section explores some criticisms of Baumol and explains how addressing these criticisms can provide paths forward for entrepreneurship studies that do justice to Baumol’s work while at the same time integrating it into important emerging research. In particular, Baumol’s arguments open the way to research on institutional entrepreneurship as well as the judgment-based view of entrepreneurial decision-making. The fourth section then considers the policy implications of Baumol’s work. The final short section concludes.

Keywords

Productive entrepreneurship Unproductive entrepreneurship Destructive entrepreneurship Institutions Institutional entrepreneurship Innovation Economic growth Entrepreneurial judgment 

References

  1. Acemoglu, D. (1995). Reward structures and the allocation of talent. European Economic Review, 39(1), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ageev, A. I., Gratchev, M. V., & Hisrich, R. D. (1995). Entrepreneurship in the Soviet Union and post-socialist Russia. Small Business Economics, 7(5), 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumol, W. J. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review, 58(2), 64–71.Google Scholar
  5. Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumol, W. J. (2003). On Austrian analysis of entrepreneurship and my own. Advances in Austrian Economics, 6, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumol, W. J. (2006). Textbook entrepreneurship: Comment on Johansson. Econ Journal Watch, 3(1), 133–136.Google Scholar
  8. Baumol, W. J., & Strom, R. J. (2007). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 233–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhagwati, J. N. (1982). Directly unproductive, profit-seeking (DUP) activities. Journal of Political Economy, 90(5), 988–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. J. (2012). How institutions of liberty promote entrepreneurship and growth. In J. Gwartney, R. Lawson, & J. Hall (Eds.), Economic freedom of the world: 2012 Annual Report (pp. 247–270). Vancouver: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. J. (2016). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: What do we know and what do we still need to know? Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 292–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boettke, P. J., & Piano, E. (2016). Baumol’s productive and unproductive entrepreneurship after 25 years. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 5(2), 130–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowen, H. P., & De Clercq, D. (2008). Institutional context and the allocation of entrepreneurial effort. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 747–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bradley, S. W., & Klein, P. (2016). Institutions, economic freedom, and entrepreneurship: The contribution of management scholarship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bylund, P. L., & McCaffrey, M. (2017). A theory of entrepreneurship and institutional uncertainty. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 461–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cantillon, R.. (2001 [1755]). Essay on the nature of commerce in general (trans: Higgs. H.). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  17. Clark, J. R., & Lee, D. R. (2006). Freedom, entrepreneurship and economic progress. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coyne, C. J., Sobel, R. S., & Dove, J. A. (2010). The non-productive entrepreneurial process. Review of Austrian Economics, 23(4), 333–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davidson, A. B., & Ekelund, R. B., Jr. (1994). Can entrepreneurship be “unproductive?” Towards an evolutionary interpretation. Review of Social Economy, 52(4), 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davidsson, P. (2015). Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 674–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidsson, P. (2016). Researching entrepreneurship: Conceptualization and design (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Demsetz, H. (1969). Information and efficiency: Another viewpoint. Journal of Law and Economics, 12(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Desai, S., & Acs, Z. J. (2007). A theory of destructive entrepreneurship. Jena Economic Research Papers, No. 2007, 085.Google Scholar
  25. DeTienne, D. R., Shepherd, D. A., & De Castro, J. O. (2008). The fallacy of “only the strong survive”: The effects of extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions for under-performing firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(5), 528–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Douhan, R., & Henrekson, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship and second-best institutions: Going beyond Baumol’s typology. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 20(4), 629–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Engelhardt, L. (2012). Expansionary monetary policy and decreasing entrepreneurial quality. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 15(2), 172–194.Google Scholar
  29. Fetter, F. A. (1915). Economic principles. New York: The Century Co.Google Scholar
  30. Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2012). Organizing entrepreneurial judgment: A new approach to the firm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Foss, K., Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., & Klein, S. K. (2007). The entrepreneurial organization of heterogeneous capital. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1165–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hall, J., Matos, S., Sheehan, L., & Silvestre, B. (2012). Entrepreneurship and innovation at the base of the pyramid: A recipe for inclusive growth or social exclusion? Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 785–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Henrekson, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship: A weak link in the welfare state? Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3), 437–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Henrekson, M., & Sanandaji, T. (2011). The interaction of entrepreneurship and institutions. Journal of Institutional Economics, 7(1), 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoselitz, B. F. (1960). The early history of entrepreneurial theory. In J. J. Spengler & W. R. Allen (Eds.), Essays in economic thought: Aristotle to Marshall. Chicago: Rand McNally & Company.Google Scholar
  37. Kalantaridis, C. (2014). Institutional change in the Schumpeterian–Baumolian construct: Power, contestability and evolving entrepreneurial interests. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26(1–2), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klein, P. G., & Foss, N. J. (2008). The unit of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Opportunities or investments? International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 6(3), 145–170.Google Scholar
  39. Knight, F. H. (1933 [1921]). Risk, uncertainty, and profit, Series of reprints of scarce works on political economy No. 16. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
  40. Levie, J., & Autio, E. (2008). A theoretical grounding and test of the GEM model. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lucas, D. S., & Fuller, C. S. (2017). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive—Relative to what? Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 7, 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCaffrey, M. (2009). Entrepreneurship, economic evolution, and the end of capitalism: Reconsidering Schumpeter’s thesis. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 12(4), 3–21.Google Scholar
  43. McCaffrey, M. (2015). Economic policy and entrepreneurship: Alertness or judgment? In P. Bylund & D. Howden (Eds.), The next generation of Austrian economics: Essays in honor of Joseph T. Salerno (pp. 183–199). Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  44. McCaffrey, M., & Salerno, J. T. (2011). A theory of political entrepreneurship. Modern Economy, 2(4), 552–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCloskey, D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 132–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McMullen, J. S., Bagby, D., & Palich, L. E. (2008). Economic freedom and the motivation to engage in entrepreneurial action. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 875–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Minniti, M. (2008). The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: Productive, unproductive, or destructive? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5), 779–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1991). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Padilla, A., & Cachanosky, N. (2016). Indirectly productive entrepreneurship. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 5(2), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reynolds, P. D. (1997). Who starts new firms?–Preliminary explorations of firms-in-gestation. Small Business Economics, 9(5), 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rothbard, M. N. (1987). Breaking out of the Walrasian box: The cases of Schumpeter and Hansen. Review of Austrian Economics, 1(1), 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Salerno, J. T. (1990a). Ludwig von Mises as social rationalist. Review of Austrian Economics, 4(1), 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salerno, J. T. (1990b). Postscript: Why a socialist economy is ‘impossible’. In Economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  55. Salerno, J. T. (1993). Mises and Hayek dehomogenized. Review of Austrian Economics, 6(2), 113–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development (trans: Opie. R.). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
  58. Schumpeter, J. A. (1986 [1954]). History of economic analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Shepherd, D. A., & DeTienne, D. R. (2005). Prior knowledge, potential financial reward, and opportunity identification. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sobel, R. S. (2008). Testing Baumol: Institutional quality and the productivity of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tyson, L. D. A., Petrin, T., & Rogers, H. (1994). Promoting entrepreneurship in Eastern Europe. Small Business Economics, 6(3), 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ucbasaran, D., Shepherd, D. A., Lockett, A., & Lyon, S. J. (2013). Life after business failure: The process and consequences of business failure for entrepreneurs. Journal of Management, 39(1), 163–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. von Mises, L. (1990). Economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth. Auburn: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  65. von Mises, L. (1998 [1949]). Human action: Scholar’s edition. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  66. von Mises, L. (2008 [1951]). Profit and loss. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  67. Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Westlund, H., & Bolton, R. (2003). Local social capital and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 21(2), 77–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Williamson, O. E. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zellweger, T. M., & Astrachan, J. H. (2008). On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review, 21(4), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew McCaffrey
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations