Advertisement

Sustainable System Value Creation: Development of Preliminary Frameworks for a Business Model Change Within a Systemic Transition Process

  • Katariina Koistinen
  • Minttu Laukkanen
  • Mirja Mikkilä
  • Janne Huiskonen
  • Lassi Linnanen
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

Although corporate sustainability has gained more attention and companies have recently showed a growing interest in sustainable practices, the progress towards sustainable development has been slow leading to increasing environmental and social challenges. Business model innovations are recognized as a key to the creation of sustainable business and as a bridge between company level and system level changes. Sustainable business model innovations create, deliver and capture economic, social, and ecological value for customers and other stakeholders in various societies. The aim of this chapter is to deepen the understanding of the ways how companies create and capture sustainable value through business models in a larger operation system. From the theoretical perspective, the chapter adopts the transition theory and the concept of strong sustainabilit y for understanding socio-technical transitions and business model changes towards sustainability. Here the focus is on companies’ dualistic role pursuing sustainable development targets—both contributing to sustainability within the business dimensions, and assisting the broader systemic change through the new sustainable business models. Furthermore, the chapter deals with the external factors that either enable or hinder companies to transform their existing business models towards sustainability. By reviewing previous literature, this study develops preliminary frameworks combining the approaches of transition management, sustainable value creation and corporate sustainability levels. The work aims to decrease the existing gap between the literature of system transition and business models. The frameworks can be applied in the future in analyzing new sustainable business models, value processes , value creation and capture, and broader systemic changes towards sustainability.

References

  1. Abdelkafi, N., & Täuscher, K. (2016). Business models for sustainability from a system dynamics perspective. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 74–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2012). Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(3), 41–49.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J., Narus, J., & Van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 91–99.Google Scholar
  4. Baden-Fuller, C., & Morgan, M. (2010). Business models as models. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 156–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker, S. (2014). Actor rationales in sustainability transitions: Interests and expectations regarding electric vehicle recharging. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 13, 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bakker, S., Van Lente, H., & Engels, R. (2012). Competition in a technological niche: The cars of the future. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 24(5), 421–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bardhi, F., & Eckhardt, G. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumgartner, R., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: Sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18(2), 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Sterling, A. (2005). Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. In B. Elzen, F. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 48–75). Camberley: Edward Elgar publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2013). A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corporate Governance, 13(5), 482–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bocken, N., Rana, P., & Short, S. (2015). Value mapping for sustainable business thinking. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32(1), 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J., & Wagner, M. (2013). Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bork, S., Schoormansb, J., Silvester, S., & Joored, P. (2015). How actors can influence the legitimation of new consumer product categories: A theoretical framework. Environmental Innovations and Societal Transitions, 16, 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carayannis, E., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2014). Business model innovation as lever of organizational sustainability. Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Ricart, J. (2010). From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 195–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cavalcante, S., Kesting, P., & Ulhøi, J. (2011). Business model dynamics and innovation: (Re)establishing the missing linkages. Management Decision, 49(8), 1327–1342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chaurey, A., Krithika, P., Palit, D., Rakesh, S., & Sovacool, B. (2012). New partnerships and business models for facilitating energy access. Energy Policy, 47(suppl.1), 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Den Ouden, E. (2012). Innovation design: Creating value for people, organizations and society. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2015). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Falagas, M., Pitsouni, E., Malietzis, G., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2004). Sustainable value added: Measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics, 48(2), 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fudge, S., Peters, M., & Woodman, B. (2016). Local authorities as niche actors: The case of energy governance in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gauthier, C., & Gilomen, B. (2016). Business models for sustainability. Organization and Environment, 29(1), 124–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Geels, F. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Geels, F. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39, 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geels, F. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Geels, F. (2014). Reconceptualising the co-evolution of firms-in-industries and their environments: Developing an inter-disciplinary triple embeddedness framework. Research Policy, 43, 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geels, F., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Geels, F., & Verhees, B. (2011). Cultural legitimacy and framing struggles in innovation journeys: A cultural-performative perspective and a case study of Dutch nuclear energy (1945-1986). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(6), 910–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Genus, A., & Coles, A.-M. (2008). Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy, 37, 1436–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gorissen, L., Vrancken, K., & Manshoven, S. (2016). Transition thinking and business model innovation: Towards a transformative business model and new role for the reuse centers of Limburg, Belgium. Sustainability, 8(2), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2011). On patterns and agency in transition dynamics: Some key insights from the KSI programme. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hahn, T., Figge, F., & Barkemeyer, R. (2007). Sustainable value creation among companies in the manufacturing sector. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 7(5), 496–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Haxeltine, A., & Seyfang, G. (2009). Transitions for the people: Theory and practice of ‘Transition’ and ‘Resilience’ in UK’s Transition Movement (Working paper 134). Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich. Accessed from http://www.tyndall.ac.uk/sites/default/files/twp134.pdf.
  38. Heijden, A., Van der Cramer, J., & Driessen, P. (2012). Change agent sensemaking for sustainability in a multinational subsidiary. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 25(4), 535–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hekkert, M., Suurs, R., Negro, S., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(4), 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hellström, M., Tsvetkova, A., Gustafsson, M., & Wikström, K. (2015). Collaboration mechanisms for business models in distributed energy ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 226–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnson, M., & Suskewicz, J. (2009). How to jump-start the clean-tech economy. Harvard Business Review, 87(11), 52–60.Google Scholar
  42. King, B. (2008). A social movement perspective of stakeholder collective action and influence. Business & Society, 47(1), 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klitkou, A., Bolwig, S., Hansem, T., & Wessberg, N. (2015). The role of lock-in mechanisms in transition processes: The case of energy for road transport. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuosmanen, T., & Kuosmanen, N. (2009). How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might). Ecological Economics, 69, 235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lacy, P., Haines, A., & Hayward, R. (2012). Developing strategies and leaders to succeed in a new era of sustainability: Findings and insights from the United Nations global compact-Accenture CEO study. Journal of Management Development, 31(4), 346–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laukkanen, M., & Patala, S. (2014). Analysing the barriers to sustainable business model innovations: Innovation systems approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 18(6), 1440010.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919614400106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lehner, M. (2015). Translating sustainability: The role of the retail store. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(4), 386–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the business models for circular economy: Towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability, 8(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Linnenluecke, M., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 382–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Markard, J., & Truffer, B. (2008). Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37, 596–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. (1999). Designing qualitative research. Thousands Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Mikkilä, M. (2006). The many faces of responsibility: Acceptability of the global pulp and paper industry in various societies. Dissertationes Forestales 25. http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes/df25.pdf.
  53. Mikkilä, M., & Toppinen, A. (2008). A qualitative analysis of corporate responsibility reporting in the world’s largest pulp and paper companies. Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 500–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mikkilä, M., Panapanaan, V., & Linnanen, L. (2015). Corporate responsibility in Finland: From local movements to global responsibility. In S. O. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, & M. Fifka (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in Europe (pp. 209–228). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Mikkilä, M., Panapanaan, V., & Linnanen, L. (2016). The pursuit of responsible business: Corporate responsibility of Finnish companies in their global operations. In S. O. Idowu (Ed.), Key initiatives in corporate social responsibility (pp. 177–200). Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21641-6_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousands Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Milne, M., Kearins, K., & Walton, S. (2006). Creating adventures in Wonderland: The journey metaphor and environmental sustainability. Organization, 13, 801–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87(9), 56–64.Google Scholar
  59. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. Pedersen, E., Gwozdz, W., & Hvass, K. (2016). Exploring the relationship between business model innovation, corporate sustainability, and organisational values within the fashion industry. Journal of Business Ethics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3044-7.
  61. Planing, P. (2015). Business model innovation in a circular economy: Reasons for non-acceptance of circular business models. Open Journal of Business Model Innovation. Accessed from http://www.scipublish.com/journals/BMI/papers/1250.
  62. Rizzi, F., Bartolozzi, I., Borghini, A., & Frey, M. (2013). Environmental management of end-of-life products: Nine factors of sustainability in collaborative networks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(8), 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F., Lambin, E., et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(22), 472–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Short, S., Bocken, N., Barlow, C., & Chertow, M. (2014). From refining sugar to growing tomatoes: Industrial ecology and business model evolution. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18(5), 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 9(4), 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., et al. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 367(6223), 1259855.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tukker, A. (2015). Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Upward, A., & Jones, P. (2016). An ontology for strongly sustainable business models: Defining an enterprise framework compatible with natural and social science. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F., & Morgan, F. W. (2006). Historical perspectives on service-dominant logic. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 29–42). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Inc.Google Scholar
  75. Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H., & Evans, B. (2010). Trust and community: Exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy. Energy Policy, 38, 2655–2663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. WCED. (1987). WCED our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Whiteman, G., Walker, B., & Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wiek, A., Ness, B., Schweizer-Ries, P., Brand, F., & Farioli, F. (2012). From complex systems analysis to transformational change: A comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Williams, C., & Millington, A. (2004). The diverse and contested meanings of sustainable development. The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Woodall, T. (2003). Conceptualising ‘value for the customer’: An attributional, structural and dispositional analysis. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 2003(12), 1–42.Google Scholar
  81. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2010). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 216–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katariina Koistinen
    • 1
  • Minttu Laukkanen
    • 1
  • Mirja Mikkilä
    • 1
  • Janne Huiskonen
    • 1
  • Lassi Linnanen
    • 1
  1. 1.Lappeenranta University of TechnologyLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations