Advertisement

Transformative Business Models for Sustainability Transitions

  • Antonia Proka
  • P. J. Beers
  • Derk Loorbach
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the role of business models in sustainability transitions. Sustainability-oriented entrepreneurs develop business models that can transform the societal systems they operate in, functioning in this way as a catalyst for system-wide transitions. But what does it take for a business model to be transformative? This chapter introduces Transformative Business Models as a new framework to advance our understanding of how the business model concept can contribute to sustainability transitions as well as how transition thinking supports the prospects of sustainable business models to unlock their transformative potential. Our argument is that the reflexive dynamics that play out between the innovative businesses and the regimes in which they emerge play a critical role in determining whether the emerging transformations will over time lead to fundamental systemic change. Building on insights from a business model perspective and sustainability transitions, the introduced framework enables a systematic analysis of these dynamics. To illustrate its merits, this chapter presents the case of Deltawind, an energy cooperative in the Netherlands. The chapter concludes by proposing three main characteristics of business models exhibiting transformative potential: a broad value orientation, a broad stakeholder network , and a reflexive orientation.

References

  1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U., Bonss, W., & Lau, C. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization. Problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beers, P. J., & Van Mierlo, B. (2014). Reflexivity and learning in the context of sustainable development: Prying loose two entangled concepts. Paper presented at the SISA2.Google Scholar
  4. Beers, P. J., & Van Mierlo, B. (2017). Reflexivity and learning in system innovation processes. Sociologia Ruralis, 57(3), 415–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beers, P. J., Hermans, F., Veldkamp, T., & Hinssen, J. (2014). Social learning inside and outside transition projects: Playing free jazz for a heavy metal audience. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 69, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bocken, N., & Short, S. (2016). Towards a sufficiency-driven business model: Experiences and opportunities. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Haan, J. (2010). Towards transition theory. Rotterdam: DRIFT, Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  9. Doganova, L., & Eyquem-Renault, M. (2009). What do business models do? Innovation devices in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 38(10), 1559–1570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feiit, A. (2011). Onderzoek naar de naamsbekendheid en het imago van een coöperatie met milieuvriendelijke doelen. Rapportage. Versie concept-01.Google Scholar
  11. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuenfschilling, L., & Truffer, B. (2014). The structuration of socio-technical regimes - conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Research Policy, 43(4), 772–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geels, F. W., & Kemp, R. (2000). Transities vanuit sociotechnisch perspectief. The Hague: Report for the Dutch Ministry of Environment.Google Scholar
  14. Geels, F., & Kemp, R. (2007). Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society, 29, 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long-term transformative change. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hisschemöller, M., & Bode, R. (2011). Institutionalized knowledge conflict in assessing the possible contributions of H2 to a sustainable energy system for the Netherlands. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(1), 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, M., Christensen, C., & Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 50–59.Google Scholar
  18. Jonker, J. (Ed.). (2014). Nieuwe business modellen: Samen werken aan waardecreatie. Den Haag: Academic Service.Google Scholar
  19. Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Loorbach, D., & Wijsman, K. (2013). Business transition management: Exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainability innovation: Conceptual foundations and the case of solar energy. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Lüneburg: Leuphana University.Google Scholar
  23. Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matter. Harvard Business Review, 80(5), 86–92.Google Scholar
  24. Norval, A. (2000). Review article: The things we do with words—Contemporary approaches to the analysis of ideology. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 313–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Proka, A., Hischemöller, M., & Loorbach, D. (forthcoming). Assessing the transformative potential of renewable energy initiatives: A framework based on business model and sustainability transitions literature. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  28. REN21. (2017). Renewables 2017 global status report. Retrieved from http://www.ren21.net/gsr-2017/
  29. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research, and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shafer, S., Smith, H., & Linder, J. (2005). The power of business models. Business Horizons, 48, 199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, A. (2007). Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Techology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 427–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41, 1025–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stähler, P. (2002). Business models as a unit of analysis for strategizing. Accessed from http://www.business-model-innovation.com/en/definitions.htm.
  34. Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a ‘sustainability business model’. Organization & Environment, 21, 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Teece, D. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43, 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Mierlo, B., Arkesteijn, M., & Leeuwis, C. (2010). Enhancing the reflexivity of system innovation projects with system analyses. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(2), 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (Eds.). (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  38. Wirtz, B., Pistoia, A., Ullrich, S., & Göttel, V. (2016). Business models: Origin, development and future research perspectives. Long Range Planning, 49, 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Yin, R. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Yin, R. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dutch Research Institute for TransitionsErasmus University of RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Dutch Research Institute for TransitionsHAS University of Applied Sciences & Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations