Advertisement

Introduction: From Corporate Social Responsibility to Sustainable Business Models

  • Lars Moratis
  • Frans Melissen
  • Samuel O. Idowu
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

The concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR), defined here as coordinated business actions aimed at a more sustainable world, has always been fairly controversial, both from the perspective of academic discourse and from the perspective of corporate practice. In its most basic terms, questions have been asked about whether corporations can and should actually have social responsibilities and, if so, to what extent? (cf. Davis 1973; Moon et al. 2005). Reflecting on the social responsibilities of business, a scholarly debate has developed that has given rise to a multitude of conceptions on the roles and responsibilities of business in society. These conceptions roughly vary from Friedman’s position that the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits (Friedman 1970) to positions about CSR that reflect the principle of sustainable development as formulated in the well-known “Brundtland report” as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (WCED 1987: 204) and that now extend to and is operationalized through the Sustainable Development Goals. While different positions on the responsibilities of business in society remain to be held, partly motivated by political beliefs and worldviews, the question “what is a business for?” is nowadays answered in a way that aligns with a broader conception including taking into account the interests of and being accountable to a broader set of stakeholders than merely those with a financial or otherwise economic concern as well as society as a whole, nature and future generations. A survey among consumers from 10 of the world’s largest countries showed that some 81% thought that firms have responsibilities going (far) beyond creating shareholder value, with 31% thinking that firms should change the way they operate to align with greater social and environmental needs (Cone Communications/Echo 2013).

References

  1. Al-Debei, M., & Avison, D. (2010). Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of Information Systems, 19(3), 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2010a). Business model design: An activity system perspective. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 216–226.Google Scholar
  3. Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2010b). Business model innovation: Creating value in times of change. Working paper WP-870. Barcelona: IESE.Google Scholar
  4. Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, A., & Shabana, K. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casadesus-Masanell, R., & Zhu, F. (2013). Business model innovation and competitive imitation: The case of sponsor-based business models. Strategic Management Journal, 34(4), 464–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochran, P. (2007). The evolution of corporate responsibility. Business Horizons, 50(6), 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cone Communications/Echo. (2013). 2013 Global CSR study. Boston: Cone Communications/Echo.Google Scholar
  10. Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322.Google Scholar
  12. Doane, D. (2005). Beyond corporate social responsibility: Minnows, mammoths and markets. Futures, 37(2/3), 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edelman. (2017). 2017 Edelman Trust Barometer. New York: Edelman.Google Scholar
  14. Fleming, P., & Jones, M. (2012). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times.Google Scholar
  16. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1/2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Globescan. (2012). Credibility gap persists around companies’ CSR communications. Featured findings. Accessed at: http://www.globescan.com/commentary-and-analysis/featured-findings/entry/credibility-gap-persists-around-companies-csr-communications.html
  18. Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2009). Business model concepts in corporate sustainability contexts: From rhetoric to a generic template for ‘business models for sustainability’. Working paper, Center for Sustainability Management, Leuphana Universität, Lüneburg.Google Scholar
  19. Lys, T., Naughton, J., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). ‘Implicit’ and ‘explicit’ CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Melissen, F. (2016). 4th Generation sustainable business models. NHTV: Breda.Google Scholar
  22. Mol, A. (2006). Environment and modernity in transitional China: Frontiers of ecological modernization. Development and Change, 37(1), 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 429–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moratis, L. (2014). The perversity of business case approaches to CSR: Nuancing and extending the critique of Nijhof & Jeurissen. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 34(9/10), 654–669.Google Scholar
  25. Moratis, L. (2015). Standardizing a better world? Essays and critical reflections on the ISO 26000 standard for corporate social responsibility. Heerlen: Open University.Google Scholar
  26. Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2006). A sensemaking perspective on corporate social responsibility: Introduction to the special issue. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 316–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nijhof, A., & Jeurissen, R. (2010). The glass ceiling of corporate social responsibility: Consequences of a business case approach to CSR. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(2), 618–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Okoye, A. (2009). Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary? Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 613–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challenges. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a new wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.Google Scholar
  31. Rauter, R., Jonker, J., & Baumgartner, R. (2017). Going one’s own way: Drivers in developing business models for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 144–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a ‘sustainable business model’. Organization & Environment, 21(2), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. SustainAbility. (2014). Model behavior: 20 business model innovations for sustainability. London: SustainAbility.Google Scholar
  34. Teece, D. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2/3), 172–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Terlaak, A. (2007). Order without law: The role of certified management standards in shaping socially desired form behaviors. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 968–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Visser, W. (2011). The age of responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the new DNA of business. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  37. Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society, 55(8), 1083–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. WCED. (1987). Our common future. Report of the world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wells, P. (2013). Business models for sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wettstein, F. (2010). For better or for worse: Corporate responsibility beyond ‘do no harm’. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. WWF. (2016). Living planet report 2016: Risk and resilience in a new era. Gland: WWF International.Google Scholar
  42. Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Moratis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frans Melissen
    • 1
  • Samuel O. Idowu
    • 3
  1. 1.NHTV Breda University of Applied SciencesBredathe Netherlands
  2. 2.Antwerp Management SchoolAntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.London Metropolitan UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations