Advertisement

Computation in Early Mesopotamia

  • Duncan J. MelvilleEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education in the Digital Era book series (MEDE, volume 11)

Abstract

The history of Mesopotamian mathematics begins around 3300 BCE with the development of written systems for recording the control and flow of goods and other economic resources such as land. Numeration was bound up with measurement and was a collection of concrete systems. One of the key developments over the subsequent thousand years or so was the gradual rationalization of these complex concrete systems and the consequent emergence of an abstract conception of number and techniques of computation that applied regardless of metrological category. Throughout their history Mesopotamian scribes organized knowledge in the form of lists. In mathematics there were also lists, but along with lists came metrological and mathematical tables, two-dimensional arrays of data that organized information both vertically and horizontally. A key example is tables giving lists of lengths of sides of square or rectangular fields, along with their areas; the problem of computation of areas remained a constant concern throughout the period covered here. In this chapter, we cover the development of Mesopotamian computation from the archaic period up to the edge of the emergence of the fully abstract sexagesimal computational system for which they are renowned, tracing, as far as can be seen with currently available sources, the long developmental process.

Keywords

Mesopotamian mathematics Sargonic mathematics Early Dynastic Archaic Computation Mathematical tables 

References

  1. Adams, R. Mc. C. 1981. Heartland of cities. Surveys of ancient settlement and land use of the central floodplain of the Euphrates. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Deimel, A. 1923. Die Inschriften von Fara II: Schultexte aus Fara. Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
  3. Englund, R.K. 1993. Review of the origins of script. Science 260 (5114): 1670–1671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Englund, R.K., and J.-P. Grégoire. 1991. The Proto-Cuneiform texts from Jemdet Nasr (Materialien zu den Frühen Schriftzeugnissen des Vorderen Orients, vol. 1). Berlin: Gebrüder Mann Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Feliu, L. 2012. A new Early Dynastic IIIb metro-mathematical table tablet of area measures from Zabalam. Altorientalische Forschungen 39: 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foster, B.R. 2005. Shuruppak and the Sumerian city state. In Memoriae Igor M. Diakonoff, ed. L. Kogan, et al. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
  7. Foster, B.R., and E. Robson. 2004. A new look at the Sargonic mathematical corpus. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 94: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friberg, J. 1986. The early roots of Babylonian Mathematics, III. Three remarkable texts from ancient Ebla. Vicino Oriente 6: 3–25.Google Scholar
  9. Friberg, J. 1990. Mathematik. In Reallexikon der Assyriologie VII, ed. D.O. Edzard, 531–585. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Friberg, J. 1994. Preliterate counting and accounting in the Middle East. Orientalistische Literaturzeitung 89: 477–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Friberg, J. 1997. Round and almost round numbers in protoliterate metro-mathematical field texts. Archiv für Orientforschung 44 (45): 1–58.Google Scholar
  12. Friberg, J. 2005. On the alleged counting with sexagesimal place value numbers in mathematical cuneiform texts from the Third Millennium BC. Cuneiform Digital Library Journal 2005:2 (http://cdli.ucla.edu/pubs/cdlj/2005/cdlj2005_002.html).
  13. Friberg, J. 2007. A remarkable collection of Babylonian mathematical texts. Manuscripts in the Schøyen collection: Cuneiform texts I. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friberg, J. 2014. Geometric division problems, quadratic equations, and recursive geometric algorithms in Mesopotamian mathematics. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 68 (1): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Høyrup, J. 1996. Changing trends in the historiography of Mesopotamian mathematics: An insider’s view. History of Science 34: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Høyrup, J. 2002a. A note on Old Babylonian computational techniques. Historia Mathematica 29: 193–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Høyrup, J. 2002b. Lengths, widths, surfaces: A portrait of Old Babylonian algebra and its kin. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jestin, R. 1937. Tablettes sumériennes de Shuruppak au Musée de Stamboul. Paris: E. de Boccard.Google Scholar
  19. Lieberman, S.J. 1980. Of clay pebbles, hollow clay balls, and writing: A Sumerian view. American Journal of Archaeology 84: 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Limet, H. 1973. Étude de documents de la période d’Agadé appartenant à l’Université de Liège. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
  21. Liverani, M. 1990. The shape of Neo-Sumerian fields. Bulletin on Sumerian Agriculture 5: 147–186.Google Scholar
  22. Luckenbill, D. 1930. Inscriptions from Adab. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Melville, D. 2002. Ration computations at Fara: Multiplication or repeated addition? In Under one sky: Astronomy and mathematics in the Ancient Near East (London, 2001) (AOAT 297), ed. J.M. Steele, and A. Imhausen, 237–252. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Melville, D. 2016. After Neugebauer: Recent developments in Mesopotamian mathematics. In A mathematician’s journeys: Otto Neugebauer and modern transformations of ancient science, ed. A. Jones, C. Proust, and J. Steele, 237–263. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nissen, H.J., P. Damerow, and R. Englund. 1993. Archaic bookkeeping: Early writing and techniques of economic administration in the ancient Near East. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pomponio, F., and G. Visicato. 1994. Early Dynastic administrative texts of Šuruppak. Napoli, Istituto universitario orientale di Napoli, Dipartimento di studi asiatici.Google Scholar
  27. Powell, M.A. 1990. Masse und Gewichte. In Reallexikon der Assyriologie VII, ed. D.O. Edzard, 457–530. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Proust, C. 2000. La multiplication babylonienne: la part non écrite du calcul. Revue d’histoire des mathématiques 6: 293–303.Google Scholar
  29. Proust, C. 2007. Tablettes mathématiques de Nippur. Paris: Institut Français d’Études Anatoliennes-Georges Dumézil.Google Scholar
  30. Proust, C. (forthcoming). Early-Dynastic tables from Southern Mesopotamia, or the multiple facets of the quantification of surfaces. In Mathematics and administration in the ancient world, ed. K. Chemla, and C. Michel.Google Scholar
  31. Robson, E. 2007. Mesopotamian mathematics. In The mathematics of Egypt, Mesopotamia, China, India, and Islam, ed. V. Katz, 57–186. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Robson, E. 2008. Mathematics in Ancient Iraq: A social history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1992. Before writing I–II. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  34. Visicato, G. 1995. The Bureaucracy of Šuruppak. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  35. Visicato, G. 2000. The power and the writing. Bethesda, MD: CDL Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Lawrence UniversityCantonUSA

Personalised recommendations