Peripheral Nerve Evaluation

Chapter

Abstract

Peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) is an important initial step in assessing patient eligibility for permanent implantation of the sacral nerve stimulation system. PNE has been used since 1997 for the initial test phase and maintains many advantages. Advances in lead wire technology have increased the frequency of the initial test phase being performed in the operating room; however, this is an expensive and labor intensive technique. PNE is an office-based procedure, which is considered to be relatively easy for providers, as well as fast and safe for patients. In this chapter we discuss the historical evolution of PNE, the technique and tools to aid in correct placement, and compare its use to placement of the tined lead wire in the operating room.

Keywords

Peripheral nerve evaluation (PNE) Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) Test stimulation Urinary urgency incontinence (UUI) Urinary retention (UR) Overactive ladder (OAB) InterStim 

References

  1. 1.
    InterStim® sales analysis of 2013.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gormley EA, Lightner DJ, Faraday M, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of overactive bladder (non-neurogenic) in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline amendment. J Urol. 2015;193:1572–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paquette IM, Varma MG, Kaiser AM, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice guideline for the treatment of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(7):623–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    El-Azab A, Siegel S. Specific tips for general controversies in sacral neuromodulation. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17:79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen B, Tunuguntla H, Gousse A. Predictors of success for the first stage neuromodulation: motor versus sensory response. J Urol. 2006;175:2178–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janknegt R, Weil E, Eerdmans P. Improving neuromodulation technique for refractory voiding dysfunctions: two stage implant. Adult Urol. 1997;49:358–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodine P, Falkner P, Brelje T, et al. Sacral foramen localization for needle placement: diagnostic ultrasound vs. fluoroscopy. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(S1):S90.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Siegel S, Noblett K, Mangel J, et al. Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter study evaluating sacral neuromodulation with InterStim therapy compared to standard medical therapy at 6-months in subjects with mild symptoms of overactive bladder. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:224–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pannek J, Grigoleit U, Hinkel A. Bacterial contamination of test stimulation leads during percutaneous nerve stimulation. J Urol. June 2005;65:1096–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siegel S, Catanzaro F, Dijkema H et al. Long-term results of a multicenter study on sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of urinary urge incontinence, urgency-frequency, and retention. Urology. 2000;56(Suppl. 6A).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bosch J, Groen J. Sacral nerve neuromodulation in the treatment of patients with refractory motor urge incontinence: long-term results of a prospective longitudinal study. J Urol. 2000;163:1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Spinelli M, Giardiello G, Gerber M, et al. New sacral neuromodulation lead for percutaneous implantation using local anesthesia: description and first experience. J Urol. 2003;170:1905–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van Kerrebroek P, Voskuilen A, Heesakkers J, et al. Results of sacral neuromodulation therapy for urinary voiding dysfunction: outcomes of a prospective, worldwide clinical study. J Urol. 2007;178:2029–34.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Auterio S, Hallas N, Betts N, et al. The cost-effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for the treatment of idiopathic medically refractory overactive bladder (wet) in the UK. BJU Int. 2015;116(6):945–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amend B, Khalil M, Kessler T, et al. How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(5):327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sievert KD, Nagele U, Pannek J, et al. Subcutaneous tunneling of the temporary testing electrode significantly improves the success rate of subchronic sacral nerve modulation. World J Urol. 2007;25:607–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive SurgeryUniversity of California, IrvineOrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations