Why Do Birds Lay Eggs in Conspecifics’ Nests?
Conspecific brood parasitism (CBP) resembles interspecific brood parasitism, except that parasitic females lay eggs in the nests of conspecifics. CBP is a female alternative reproductive behavior, and understanding its evolution requires a life history approach. We review studies that investigate life history aspects of CBP. One or more life history components have been examined for 56 species, 49 of which are relevant to the adaptive basis of CBP. Various approaches have been used to detect CBP, but there is increasing reliance on molecular methods. Molecular methods are not always foolproof, and false exclusions are incorrectly interpreted as CBP; future studies should employ multiple lines of evidence. Two types of parasites have been documented, often in the same species: non-nesting females without their own nest in a given year and nesting females that lay some of their eggs parasitically. There is no evidence for lifelong professional brood parasites; non-nesting females apparently adopt parasitism to make the best of a bad job, although we lack a clear understanding of the specific constraints that prevent these females from nesting or the costs that make restraint a better option. Parasitism by nesting females is common, surprisingly so in the precocial waterfowl, and is only rarely associated with breeding interruption or nest loss. Nesting females appear to use parasitism to enhance their reproductive output, but for most species it is not clear why females don’t lay the additional eggs in their own nest. A full understanding of this form of brood parasitism will require a better understanding of clutch size constraints.
KeywordsConspecific brood parasitism Empirical studies Review Hypotheses Life history
We thank the following for funding: NSF IOS 1355208 (JME), D. G. Raveling Endowment (JME), and NSF IOS 1354894 (BEL). We thank M. Soler for the opportunity to contribute this chapter and M. Soler and Y. Yom-Tov for helpful comments.
- Ankney CD, MacInnes CD (1978) Nutrient reserves and reproductive performance of female Lesser Snow Geese. Auk 95:459–471Google Scholar
- Brockmann HJ (2001) The evolution of alternative strategies and tactics. In: Advances in the study of behavior, vol 30. Academic, San Diego, pp 1–51Google Scholar
- Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Eadie JM (1989) Alternative female reproductive tactics in a precocial bird: the ecology and evolution of brood parasitism in Goldeneyes. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCGoogle Scholar
- Eadie JM (1991) Constraint and opportunity in the evolution of brood parasitism in waterfowl. Acta XX Congr Int Ornithol 20:1031–1040Google Scholar
- Eadie J, Semel B, Sherman PW (1998) Conspecific brood parasitism, population dynamics, and the conservation of cavity-nesting birds. In: Caro T (ed) Behavioral ecology and conservation biology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 306–340Google Scholar
- Eadie JM, Smith JNM, Zadworny D, Kuhnlein U, Cheng K (2010) Probing parentage in parasitic birds: an evaluation of methods to detect conspecific brood parasitism using goldeneyes Bucephala islandica and Bl. clangula as a test case. J Avian Biol 41:163–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-048X.2009.04735.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feare CJ (1991) Intraspecific nest parasitism in starlings Sturnus vulgaris – effects of disturbance on laying females. Ibis 133:75–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.1991.tb04813.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gibbons DW (1986) Brood parasitism and cooperative nesting in the moorhen, Gallinula chloropus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:221–232Google Scholar
- Gross MR (1996) Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 11:263–263Google Scholar
- Hötker H (2000) Conspecific nest parasitism in the Pied Avocet Recurvirostra avosetta. Ibis 142:280–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2000.tb04867.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jackson WM (1992) Estimating conspecific nest parasitism in the northern masked weaver based on within-female variability in egg appearance. Auk 109:435–443Google Scholar
- Lack D (1967) The significance of clutch-size in waterfowl. Wildfowl 18:125–128Google Scholar
- Ligon JD, Burt DB (2004) Evolutionary origins. In: Koenig W, Dickinson JL (eds) Ecology and evolution of cooperative breeding in birds. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Lyon, BE, Eadie JM (2017) A comprehensive survey of the life history aspects of conspecific brood parasitism in birds. Dataset posted at Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4787872
- Rohwer FC (1985) The adaptive significance of clutch size in prairie ducks. Auk 102:354–361Google Scholar
- Rubenstein DI (1982) Risk, uncertainty and evolutionary strategies. In: Kings’s College Sociobiology Group (ed) Current problems in sociobiolgy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 91–111Google Scholar
- Sorenson MD (1993) Parasitic egg-laying in Canvasbacks – frequency, success, and individual behavior. Auk 110:57–69Google Scholar