Advertisement

Host Defences Against Brood Parasite Nestlings: Theoretical Expectations and Empirical Evidence

  • Tomáš Grim
Chapter
Part of the Fascinating Life Sciences book series (FLS)

Abstract

In the past, chick discrimination was assumed to be non-existent without virtually any research invested to check the reality. Models of brood parasitism considered the benefits of chick rejection small and costs too high; consequently, the nestling stage was long ignored in studies of host–parasite coevolution. Remarkably, the majority of recent studies that addressed parasite chick biology did find evidence for host behaviours that alleviate the costs of parasitism during nestling stage. Most of the hosts that (apparently) discriminate against parasite chicks are acceptors of natural parasite eggs; this pattern is in line with the rarer enemy model. The main impetus for future work is therefore not naively assuming but empirically checking the (non)-existence of chick discrimination to show how common is chick discrimination in reality. This will allow to elucidate mechanisms of chick discrimination, both those that specifically evolved as a response to past parasitism pressure and those stemming from non-specific general host life history traits, and factors that facilitate or constrain their evolution.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to E. Røskaft, A. Moksnes and B. G. Stokke for their hospitality during my stay at NTNU in Trondheim in 2002 during which I conceived the rarer enemy model and to Ø. Holen for inviting me to give a seminar at the University of Oslo in October 2002 where I first presented the concept (thus, the model was developed independently from conclusions of Langmore et al. 2003). I am indebted to R. Planqué, N. F. Britton and N. R. Franks for their work on our joint manuscript (during 2003–2005) which integrated their idea of defence portfolios with my concept of rarer enemy; after being rejected six times, we decided to publish two separate papers (Grim 2006; Britton et al. 2007). For the comments on the draft, I am grateful to M. C. De Mársico and R. Planqué. The manuscript benefited from comments by D. Martín-Gálvez, R. Kilner and M. Soler. The Human Frontier Science Program (RGY69/2007 and RGY83/2012) and the Czech Science Foundation (P506/12/2404) supported my research.

References

  1. Anderson MG, Hauber ME (2007) A recognition-free mechanism for reliable rejection of brood parasites. Trends Ecol Evol 22:283–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MG, Moskát C, Bán M, Grim T, Cassey P, Hauber ME (2009) Egg eviction imposes a recoverable cost of virulence in chicks of a brood parasite. PLoS One 4:e7725CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Antonov A, Stokke BG, Ranke PS, Fossøy F, Moksnes A, Røskaft E (2010) Absence of egg discrimination in a suitable cuckoo Cuculus canorus host breeding away from trees. J Avian Biol 41:501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bán M, Moskát C, Barta Z, Hauber ME (2013) Simultaneous viewing of own and parasitic eggs is not required for egg rejection by a cuckoo host. Behav Ecol 24:1014–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Briskie JV (2003) Frequency of egg rejection by potential hosts of the New Zealand cuckoos. Condor 105:719–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Britton NF, Planqué R, Franks NR (2007) Evolution of defence portfolios in exploiter–victim systems. Bull Math Biol 69:957–988CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooker MG, Brooker LC (1989) The comparative breeding behaviour of two sympatric cuckoos, Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo Chrysococcyx basalis and the shining bronze-cuckoo C. lucidus, in Western Australia: a new model for the evolution of egg morphology and host specificity in avian brood parasites. Ibis 131:528–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Butchart SHM, Kilner RM, Fuisz T, Davies NB (2003) Differences in the nestling begging calls of hosts and host-races of the common cuckoo, Cuculus canorus. Anim Behav 65:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colombelli-Négrel D, Hauber ME, Robertson J, Sulloway FJ, Hoi H, Griggio M, Kleindorfer S (2012) Embryonic learning of vocal passwords in superb fairywrens reveals intruder cuckoo nestlings. Curr Biol 22:2155–2160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Colombelli-Négrel D, Hauber ME, Kleindorfer S (2014) Prenatal learning in an Australian songbird: habituation and individual discrimination in superb fairy-wren embryos. Proc R Soc Lond B 281:20141154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colombelli-Négrel D, Webster MS, Dowling JL, Hauber ME, Kleindorfer S (2016) Vocal imitation of mother’s calls by begging red-backed fairywren nestlings increases parental provisioning. Auk 133:273–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies NB (2000) Cuckoos, cowbirds and other cheats, 1st edn. T. & A. D. Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies NB, Brooke ML (1989) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J Anim Ecol 58:225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawkins R, Carlisle TR (1976) Parental investment, mate desertion and a fallacy. Nature 262:131–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dawkins R, Krebs JR (1979) Arms races between and within species. Proc R Soc Lond B 205:489–511CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. De Mársico MC, Gantchoff MG, Reboreda JC (2012) Host–parasite coevolution beyond the nestling stage? Mimicry of host fledglings by the specialist screaming cowbird. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:3401–3408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delhey K, Carrizo M, Verniere L, Mahler B, Peters A (2011) Rejection of brood-parasitic shiny cowbird Molothrus bonariensis nestlings by the firewood-gatherer Anumbius annumbi? J Avian Biol 42:463–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dewar D (1907) An inquiry into the parasitic habits of the Indian koel. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 17:765–782Google Scholar
  20. Fraga RM (1998) Interactions of the parasitic screaming and shiny cowbirds (Molothrus rufoaxillaris and M. bonariensis) with a shared host, the bay-winged cowbird (M. badius). In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 173–193Google Scholar
  21. Gaston AJ (1976) Brood parasitism by the pied crested cuckoo Clamator jacobinus. J Anim Ecol 45:331–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gill BJ (1998) Behavior end ecology of the shining cuckoo, Chrysococcyx lucidus. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 143–151Google Scholar
  23. Grim T (2002) Why is mimicry in cuckoo eggs sometimes so poor? J Avian Biol 33:302–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grim T (2005) Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not? Biol J Linn Soc 84:69–78Google Scholar
  25. Grim T (2006) The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: why is rejection so rare? Evol Ecol Res 8:785–802Google Scholar
  26. Grim T (2007a) Equal rights for chick brood parasites. Ann Zool Fenn 44:1–7Google Scholar
  27. Grim T (2007b) Experimental evidence for chick discrimination without recognition in a brood parasite host. Proc R Soc Lond B 274:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grim T (2008) Wing-shaking and wing-patch as nestling begging strategies: their importance and evolutionary origins. J Ethol 26:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grim T (2011) Ejecting chick cheats: a changing paradigm? Front Zool 8:14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Grim T (2013) Mimicry, signalling, and co-evolution. Ethology 119:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grim T (2017) Chick discrimination versus adaptive parasitic egg acceptance: the egg dilution effect hypothesis revisited. Ornithol Sci 16:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grim T, Samaš P (2016) Growth performance of nestling cuckoos Cuculus canorus in cavity nesting hosts. Acta Ornithol 51:175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grim T, Stokke BG (2016) In the light of introduction: importance of introduced populations for the study of brood parasite-host coevolution. In: Weis JS, Sol D (eds) Biological invasions and animal behaviour, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grim T, Kleven O, Mikulica O (2003) Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Proc R Soc Lond B 270:S73–S75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grim T, Rutila J, Cassey P, Hauber ME (2009a) Experimentally constrained virulence is costly for common cuckoo chicks. Ethology 115:14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grim T, Rutila J, Cassey P, Hauber ME (2009b) The cost of virulence: an experimental study of egg eviction by brood parasitic chicks. Behav Ecol 20:1138–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Grim T, Samaš P, Moskát C, Kleven O, Honza M, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Stokke BG (2011) Constraints on host choice: why do parasitic birds rarely exploit some common potential hosts? J Anim Ecol 80:508–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Grim T, Tyller Z, Samaš P (2017) Unusual diet of brood parasite nestlings and its fitness consequences. Auk 134:732–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hanley D, Šulc M, Brennan PLR, Hauber ME, Grim T, Honza M (2016) Dynamic egg color mimicry. Ecol Evol 6:4192–4202CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Hanley D, Grim T, Igic B, Samaš P, López AV, Shawkey MD, Hauber ME (2017) Egg discrimination along a gradient of natural variation in eggshell coloration. Proc R Soc Lond B 284:20162592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harrison C (2002) Bird nests, eggs and nestlings of Britain and Europe, 1st edn. Harper, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Hegemann A, Voesten R (2011) Can skylarks Alauda arvensis discriminate a parasite nestling? Possible case of nestling cuckoo Cuculus canorus ejection by its host parents. Ardea 99:117–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hobson KA, Sealy SG (1989) Responses of yellow warblers to the threat of cowbird parasitism. Anim Behav 38:510–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Honza M, Vošlajerová K, Moskát C (2007) Eviction behaviour of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus chicks. J Avian Biol 38:385–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Honza M, Procházka P, Šicha V, Požgayová M (2010) Nest defence in a cuckoo host: great reed warblers risk themselves equally for their own and parasitic chicks. Behaviour 147:741–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Huo J, Yang C, Su T, Liang W, Møller AP (2018) Russet sparrows spot alien chicks from their nests. Avian Res 9:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Igic B, Cassey P, Grim T, Greenwood DR, Moskát C, Rutila J, Hauber ME (2012) A shared chemical basis of avian host–parasite egg colour mimicry. Proc R Soc Lond B 279:1068–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jourdain FCR (1925) A study of parasitism in the cuckoos. Proc Zool Soc Lond 44:639–667Google Scholar
  49. Kilner RM (2006) Function and evolution of color in young birds. In: Hill G, McGraw K (eds) Bird coloration, 1st edn. Harvard University Press, London, pp 201–232Google Scholar
  50. Langmore NE, Hunt S, Kilner RM (2003) Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature 422:157–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Langmore NE, Maurer G, Adcock GJ, Kilner RM (2008) Socially acquired host-specific mimicry and the evolution of host races in Horsfield’s bronze-cuckoo Chalcites basalis. Evolution 62:1689–1699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Langmore NE, Cockburn A, Russell AF, Kilner RM (2009) Flexible cuckoo chick-rejection rules in the superb fairy-wren. Behav Ecol 20:978–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Langmore NE, Stevens M, Maurer G, Heinsohn R, Hall ML, Peters A, Kilner RM (2011) Visual mimicry of host nestlings by cuckoos. Proc R Soc Lond B 278:2455–2463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lawes MJ, Marthews TR (2003) When will rejection of parasite nestlings by hosts of nonevicting avian brood parasites be favored? A misimprinting-equilibrium model. Behav Ecol 14:757–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Levréro F, Durand L, Vignal C, Blanc A, Mathevon N (2009) Begging calls support offspring individual identity and recognition by zebra finch parents. C R Biol 332:579–589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Li D, Zhang Z, Grim T, Liang W, Stokke BG (2016) Explaining variation in brood parasitism rates between potential host species with similar habitat requirements. Evol Ecol 30:905–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lichtenstein G (2001) Low success of shiny cowbird chicks parasitizing rufous-bellied thrushes: chick–chick competition or parental discrimination? Anim Behav 61:401–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lotem A (1993) Learning to recognize nestlings is maladaptive for cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. Nature 362:743–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McLean IG, Maloney RF (1998) Brood parasitism, recognition and response: the options. In: Rothstein SI, Robinson SK (eds) Parasitic birds and their hosts, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 255–272Google Scholar
  60. McLean IG, Rhodes G (1991) Enemy recognition and response in birds. Curr Ornithol 6:173–211Google Scholar
  61. McLean IG, Waas JR (1987) Do cuckoo chicks mimic the begging calls of their hosts? Anim Behav 35:1896–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Hagen LG, Honza M, Mørk C, Olsen PH (2000) Common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and host behaviour at reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus nests. Ibis 142:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mundy PJ (1973) Vocal mimicry of their hosts by nestlings of the great spotted cuckoo and striped crested cuckoo. Ibis 115:602–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nicolai J (1964) Der Brutparasitismus der Viduinae als ethologisches Problem. Z Tierpsychol 21:129–204Google Scholar
  65. Nicolai J (1974) Mimicry in parasitic birds. Sci Am 231:92–98Google Scholar
  66. Noble DG, Davies NB, Hartley IR, McRae SB (1999) The red gape of the nestling cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) is not a supernormal stimulus for three common hosts. Behaviour 136:759–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nyári ÁS, Joseph L (2012) Evolution in Australasian mangrove forests: multilocus phylogenetic analysis of the gerygone warblers (Aves: Acanthizidae). PLoS One 7:e31840CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Payne RB (2005) The cuckoos, 1st edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  69. Payne RB, Woods JL, Payne LL (2001) Parental care in estrildid finches: experimental tests of a model of Vidua brood parasitism. Anim Behav 62:473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Planqué R, Britton NF, Franks NR, Peletier MA (2002) The adaptiveness of defence strategies against cuckoo parasitism. Bull Math Biol 64:1045–1068CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Redondo T (1993) Exploitation of host mechanisms for parental care by avian brood parasites. Etología 3:235–297Google Scholar
  72. Reed RA (1968) Studies of the diederik cuckoo Chrysococcyx caprius in the Transvaal. Ibis 110:321–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Roldán M, Soler M, Márquez R, Soler JJ (2013) The vocal begging display of great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius nestlings in nests of its two main host species: genetic differences or developmental plasticity? Ibis 155:867–876CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Samas P, Hauber ME, Cassey P, Grim T (2014) Host responses to interspecific brood parasitism: a by-product of adaptations to conspecific parasitism? Front Zool 11:34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Sánchez-Martínez MA, David S, Londoño GA, Robinson SK (2017) Brood parasitism by the enigmatic and rare pavonine cuckoo in Amazonian Peru. Auk 134:330–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sato NJ, Mikami OK, Ueda K (2010a) Egg dilution effect hypothesis: a condition under which parasitic nestling ejection behaviour will evolve. Ornithol Sci 9:115–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sato NJ, Tokue K, Noske RA, Mikami OK, Ueda K (2010b) Evicting cuckoo nestlings from the nest: a new anti-parasitism behaviour. Biol Lett 6:67–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Sato NJ, Tanaka KD, Okahisa Y, Yamamichi M, Kuehn R, Gula R, Ueda K, Theuerkauf J (2015) Nestling polymorphism in a cuckoo-host system. Curr Biol 25:R1151–R1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Schuetz JG (2005a) Low survival of parasite chicks may result from their imperfect adaptation to hosts rather than expression of defenses against parasitism. Evolution 59:2017–2024CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Schuetz JG (2005b) Reduced growth but not survival of chicks with altered gape patterns: implications for the evolution of nestling similarity in a parasitic finch. Anim Behav 70:839–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Shizuka D, Lyon BE (2010) Coots use hatch order to learn to recognize and reject conspecific brood parasitic chicks. Nature 463:223–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Shizuka D, Lyon BE (2011) Hosts improve the reliability of chick recognition by delaying the hatching of brood parasitic eggs. Curr Biol 21:515–519CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Šicha V, Procházka P, Honza M (2007) Hopeless solicitation? Host-absent vocalization in the common cuckoo has no effect on feeding rate of reed warblers. J Ethol 25:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Soler M (2002) Breeding strategy and begging intensity: influences on food delivery by parents and host selection by parasitic cuckoos. In: Wright J, Leonard ML (eds) The evolution of begging, 1st edn. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Soler M (2008) Do hosts of interspecific brood parasites feed parasitic chicks with lower-quality prey? Anim Behav 76:1761–1763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Soler M (2009) Co-evolutionary arms race between brood parasites and their hosts at the nestling stage. J Avian Biol 40:237–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Soler M, De Neve L (2012) Great spotted cuckoo nestlings but not magpie nestlings starve in experimental age-matched broods. Ethology 118:1036–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Soler M, Soler JJ, Martinez JG, Møller AP (1995) Chick recognition and acceptance – a weakness in magpies exploited by the parasitic great spotted cuckoo. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Soler M, Pérez-Contreras T, De Neve L (2013a) Magpies do not desert after prolonging the parental care period: an experimental study. Behav Ecol 24:1292–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Soler M, Ruiz-Castellano C, Carra LG, Ontanilla J, Martín-Galvez D (2013b) Do first-time breeding females imprint on their own eggs? Proc R Soc Lond B 280:20122518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Soler M, De Neve L, Roncalli G, Marcías-Sánchez E, Ibáñez-Álamo JD, Pérez-Contreras T (2014) Great spotted cuckoo fledglings are disadvantaged by magpie host parents when reared together with magpie nestlings. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Soler M, Macías-Sánchez E, Martín-Gálvez D, De Neve L (2017) Complex feeding behaviour by magpies in nests with great spotted cuckoo nestlings. J Avian Biol 48:1406–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Steyn P (1973) Some notes on the breeding biology of the striped cuckoo. Ostrich 44:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tanaka KD, Ueda K (2005) Signal exploitation by parasitic young in birds: a new categorization of manipulative signals. Ornithol Sci 4:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tanner M, Richner H (2008) Ultraviolet reflectance of plumage for parent–offspring communication in the great tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol 19:369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Thorogood R, Kilner RM, Rasmussen JL (2017) Grey gerygone hosts are not egg rejecters, but shining bronze-cuckoos lay cryptic eggs. Auk 134:340–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Tokue K, Ueda K (2010) Mangrove gerygones Gerygone laevigaster eject little bronze-cuckoo Chalcites minutillus hatchlings from parasitized nests. Ibis 152:835–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Trnka A, Grim T (2014) Testing for correlations between behaviours in a cuckoo host: why do host defences not covary? Anim Behav 92:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Trnka A, Požgayová M, Procházka P, Prokop P, Honza M (2012) Breeding success of a brood parasite is associated with social mating status of its host. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:1187–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Trnka A, Trnka M, Grim T (2015) Do rufous common cuckoo females indeed mimic a predator? An experimental test. Biol J Linn Soc 116:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Trnka A, Požgayová M, Procházka P, Capek M, Honza M (2016) Chemical defence in avian brood parasites: production and function of repulsive secretions in common cuckoo chicks. J Avian Biol 47:288–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Tyller Z, Kysučan M, Grim T (2018) Post-fledging behavior of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) attended by the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs): a comprehensive approach to study the least known stage of brood parasite-host coevolution. Wilson J Ornithol 130Google Scholar
  103. Voipio P (1953) The hepaticus variety and the juvenile types of the cuckoo. Ornis Fenn 30:97–117Google Scholar
  104. Wang N, Kimball R (2012) Nestmate killing by obligate brood parasitic chicks: is this linked to obligate siblicidal behavior? J Ornithol 153:825–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wyllie I (1981) The cuckoo, 1st edn. Batsford, LondonGoogle Scholar
  106. Yang C, Stokke BG, Antonov A, Cai Y, Shi S, Moksnes A, Røskaft E, Møller AP, Liang W, Grim T (2013) Host selection in parasitic birds: are open-cup nesting insectivorous passerines always suitable cuckoo hosts? J Avian Biol 44:216–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Yang C, Wang L, Chen M, Liang W, Møller AP (2015) Nestling recognition in red-rumped and barn swallows. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 69:1821–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Zoology and Laboratory of OrnithologyPalacký UniversityOlomoucCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations