Advertisement

Retail Crime pp 245-270 | Cite as

Shopping Crime at Place: The Case of Tel Aviv-Yafo

  • David Weisburd
  • Shai Amram
  • Maor Shay
Chapter
Part of the Crime Prevention and Security Management book series (CPSM)

Abstract

We identify all property crimes that occur at shops or malls in Tel Aviv-Yafo between 1990 and 2010. We ask whether the “law of crime concentration” applies to shopping crime. Our answer overall, is that studying this specific crime category provides general confirmation of the research that has been carried out on more general crime categories. But we also observed differences that suggest that specific types of crime may lead to different concentrations and patterns. This is reflected in the very high crime concentrations observed, and in the different developmental trends at street segments that appear to follow the construction of malls generally, and in particular “mega malls” in the city. Our research accordingly suggests both the consistency of findings in the criminology of place, as well as the importance of recognizing the specific structural factors affecting specific types of crime.

Keywords

Law of crime concentration Crime hot spots Shopping crime Crime trajectories 

References

  1. Adepoju, M., Halilu, S., So, M., Ozigis, S., Idris, I., Blessing, A., et al. (2014). Geo-Spatial Technologies for Nigerian Urban Security and Crime Management—A Study of Abuja Crime Hotspot Mapping and Analysis. In: Proceedings of the ASPRS 2014 Annual Conference, Louisville, Kentucky, KY, USA, 23–28.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. (2014). A Place-Based Approach to Understanding Gun Violence: Exploring the Physical Characteristics of Sites Where Youth-Related Gun Violence Occurred in the Halifax Regional Municipality. MA Dissertation. Retrieved November 10, 2017, from http://springerlink.com.library2.smu.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/01/25791/alexander_jemma_masters_2014.pdf?sequence=1
  3. Andresen, M. A., Curman, A. S., & Linning, S. J. (2017). The Trajectories of Crime at Places: Understanding the Patterns of Disaggregated Crime Types. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andresen, M. A., & Linning, S. J. (2012). The (In)Appropriateness of Aggregating Across Crime Types. Applied Geography, 35(1–2), 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2011). Testing the Stability of Crime Patterns: Implications for Theory and Policy. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andresen, M. A., & Malleson, N. (2014). Police Foot Patrol and Crime Displacement: A Local Analysis. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30(2), 186–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Appleyard, D., Gerson, M. S., & Lintell, M. (1981). Livable Streets, Protected Neighborhoods. Los Angles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beavon, D. J., Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1994). The Influence of Street Networks on the Patterning of Property Offenses. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 115–148.Google Scholar
  9. Bernasco, W., & Steenbeek, W. (2017). More Places than Crimes: Implications for Evaluating the Law of Crime Concentration at Place. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 451–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2010). The Concentration and Stability of Gun Violence at Micro Places in Boston, 1980–2008. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braga, A. A., Papachristos, A. V., & Hureau, D. M. (2014). The Effects of Hot Spots Policing on Crime: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 31(4), 633–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brantingham, P. J. (2016). Crime Diversity. Criminology, 54(4), 553–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brantingham, P. L., & Brantingham, P. J. (1999). Theoretical Model of Crime Hot Spot Generation. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 8(1), 7–26.Google Scholar
  14. Brower, S. N. (1980). Territory in Urban Settings. Environment and Culture, 4, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational Crime Prevention. Crime and Justice, 19, 91–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crow, W. J., & Bull, J. L. (1975). Robbery Deterrence: An Applied Behavioral Science Demonstration. La Jolla, CA: Western Behavioral Sciences Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Curman, A. S., Andresen, M. A., & Brantingham, P. J. (2015). Crime and Place: A Longitudinal Examination of Street Segment Patterns in Vancouver, BC. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(1), 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eck, J. E. (2018). The Opportunity Structure for Bad Place Management: A Theory to Assist Effective Regulation of High Crime Places. In Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. E. (Eds.). Unraveling the Crime-Place Connection, Volume 22: New Directions in Theory and Policy. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Gill, C., Wooditch, A., & Weisburd, D. (2016). Testing the “Law of Crime Concentration at Place” in a Suburban Setting: Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33, 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9304-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Granath, S. (2014). Public Place Violence in Stockholm City: Trend, Patterns and New Police Tactics. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, 15(2), 200–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Groff, E., Weisburd, D., & Morris, N. A. (2009). Where the Action Is at Places: Examining Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Juvenile Crime at Places using Trajectory Analysis and GIS. In D. Weisburd, W. Bernasco, & G. J. N. Bruinsma (Eds.), Putting Crime in Its Place: Units of Analysis in Spatial Crime Research (pp. 61–86). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Groff, E. R., Weisburd, D., & Yang, S. (2010). Is It Important to Examine Crime Trends at a Local “Micro” Level?: A Longitudinal Analysis of Street to Street Variability in Crime Trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 7–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hillier, B. (2004). Can Streets Be Made Safe? Urban Design International, 9(1), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hipp, J. R., & Kim, Y. (2017). Measuring Crime Concentration Across Cities of Varying Sizes: Complications Based on the Spatial and Temporal Scale Employed. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 595–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9349-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  27. Jaitman, L., Santos, R., & Santos, R. B. (2015). Testing the Suitability and Accuracy of Predictive Policing in Latin America. American Society of Criminology. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, S. D. (2010). A Brief History of the Analysis of Crime Concentration. European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 21(4-5), 349–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, S. D., & Bowers, K. J. (2010). Permeability and Burglary Risk: Are Cul-de-Sacs Safer? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(1), 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kautt, P. M., & Roncek, D. W. (2007). Schools as Criminal “Hot Spots”: Primary, Secondary, and Beyond. Criminal Justice Review, 32(4), 339–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klinger, D. A., & Bridges, G. S. (1997). Measurement Error in Calls-for-Service as an Indicator of Crime. Criminology, 35(4), 705–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marmor, D. (2015). Globs. In Hebrew. Retrieved November 25, 2015, from http://www.czamanski.com/Czamanski/SendFile.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=2&GID=1025
  33. Mazeika, D. M., & Kumar, S. (2017). Do Crime Hot Spots Exist in Developing Countries? Evidence from India. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(1), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagin, D. S. (1999). Analyzing Developmental Trajectories: A Semiparametric, Group-based Approach. Psychological methods, 4(2), 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagin, D. (2005). Group-Based Modeling of Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. E. (1999). Trajectories of Boys’ Physical Aggression, Opposition, and Hyperactivity on the Path to Physically Violent and Nonviolent Juvenile Delinquency. Child Development, 70(5), 1181–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pierce, G. L., Spaar, S., & Briggs, L. R. (1988). The Character of Police Work: Strategic and Tactical Implications. Boston: Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University.Google Scholar
  38. Ratcliffe, J. H. (2004). Geocoding Crime and a First Estimate of a Minimum Acceptable Hit Rate. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18(1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rice, K. J., & Smith, W. R. (2002). Socioecological Models of Automotive Theft: Integrating Routine Activity and Social Disorganization Approaches. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39(3), 304–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schnell, C., Braga, A. A., & Piza, E. L. (2017). The Influence of Community Areas, Neighborhood Clusters, and Street Segments on the Spatial Variability of Violent Crime in Chicago. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 33(3), 469–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sherman, L. W. (1987). Repeat Calls to the Police in Minneapolis. Washington, DC: Crime Control Institute.Google Scholar
  42. Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., & Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot Spots of Predatory Crime: Routine Activities and the Criminology of Place. Criminology, 27(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995). General Deterrent Effects of Police Patrol in Crime “Hot Spots”: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skogan, W., & Frydl, K. (2004). Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices.Google Scholar
  45. Smith, W. R., Frazee, S. G., & Davison, E. L. (2000). Furthering the Integration of Routine Activity and Social Disorganization Theories: Small Units of Analysis and the Study of Street Robbery as a Diffusion Process. Criminology, 38(2), 489–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor, R. B. (1988). Human Territorial Functioning: An Empirical, Evolutionary Perspective on Individual and Small Group Territorial Cognitions, Behaviors, and Consequences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor, R. B. (1997). Social Order and Disorder of Street Blocks and Neighborhoods: Ecology, Microecology, and the Systemic Model of Social Disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(1), 113–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Taylor, R. B. (1998). Crime and Small-Scale Places: What We Know, What We Can Prevent, and What Else We Need to Know. Crime and Place: Plenary Papers of the 1997 Conference on Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation, 1–22.Google Scholar
  49. Taylor, R. B., Gottfredson, S. D., & Brower, S. (1984). Block Crime and Fear: Defensible Space, Local Social Ties, and Territorial Functioning. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 21(4), 303–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality Center for Economic and Social Research. (2016). Retrieved November 11, 2017, from https://www.telaviv.gov.il/Transparency/DocLib11/%D7%A9%D7%A0%D7%AA%D7%95%D7%9F%202016.pdf
  51. Unger, D. G., & Wandersman, A. (1983). Neighboring and Its Role in Block Organizations: An Exploratory Report. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11(3), 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weisburd, D. (2015). The Law of Crime Concentration and the Criminology of Place. Criminology, 53(2), 133–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weisburd, D., & Amram, S. (2014). The Law of Concentrations of Crime at Place: The Case of Tel Aviv-Yafo. Police Practice and Research, 15(2), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., & Yang, S. (2004). Trajectories of Crime at Places: A Longitudinal Study of Street Segments in the City of Seattle. Criminology, 42(2), 283–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. E. (2004). What Can Police Do to Reduce Crime, Disorder, and Fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Policing Drug Hot Spots: The Jersey City Drug Market Analysis Experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12(4), 711–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weisburd, D., Groff, E. R., & Yang, S. (2014). Understanding and Controlling Hot Spots of Crime: The Importance of Formal and Informal Social Controls. Prevention Science, 15(1), 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weisburd, D., Groff, E. R., & Yang, S. M. (2012). The Criminology of Place: Street Segments and Our Understanding of the Crime Problem. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weisburd, D., & Lum, C. (2005). The Diffusion of Computerized Crime Mapping in Policing: Linking Research and Practice. Police Practice and Research, 6(5), 419–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weisburd, D., Maher, L., Sherman, L., Buerger, M., Cohn, E., & Petrisino, A. (1992). Contrasting Crime General and Crime Specific Theory: The Case of Hot Spots of Crime. Advances in Criminological Theory, 4(1), 45–69.Google Scholar
  61. Weisburd, D., Morris, N. A., & Groff, E. R. (2009). Hot Spots of Juvenile Crime: A Longitudinal Study of Arrest Incidents at Street Segments in Seattle, Washington. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25(4), 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weisburd, D., & Telep, C. W. (2014). Hot Spots Policing What We Know and What We Need to Know. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 30(2), 200–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wheeler, A. P., Worden, R. E., & McLean, S. J. (2016). Replicating Group-Based Trajectory Models of Crime at Micro-Places in Albany, NY. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(4), 589–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Weisburd
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shai Amram
    • 2
  • Maor Shay
    • 2
  1. 1.George Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.The Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations